• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗失败相关的危险因素。

Risk factors associated with failure of treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy.

作者信息

Chiang Ying-Cheng, Tu Yi-An, Yang Jehn-Hsiahn, Lin Shin-Yu, Lee Chien-Nan, Shih Jin-Chung

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;138(1):28-36. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12157. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12157
PMID:28319267
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with treatment failure among women with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

METHODS

In a retrospective study, the medical records of patients with CSP treated at National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, from 1994 to 2015 were reviewed. The women were managed primarily with hysterotomy, evacuation, or methotrexate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the factors associated with treatment failure.

RESULTS

Among 90 patients, 44 underwent hysterotomy, 18 underwent evacuation, and 28 received methotrexate. The success rates were 100% (44/44) for hysterotomy, 83% (15/18) for evacuation, and 57% (16/28) for methotrexate (P<0.001). ROC curve analysis indicated that a pregnancy length of 8 weeks and a mean sac diameter (MSD) of 4 cm were both predictive of failure of treatment by primary evacuation and methotrexate. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, an MSD of 4 cm or more was the only independent risk factor for treatment failure (odds ratio 68.99, 95% confidence interval 6.27-759.60; P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Primary hysterotomy was suitable for treatment of CSP of any size. Failure of primary evacuation or methotrexate usually occurred when the MSD was larger than 4 cm.

摘要

目的

确定剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)女性治疗失败的相关危险因素。

方法

在一项回顾性研究中,回顾了1994年至2015年在台湾台北国立台湾大学医院接受治疗的CSP患者的病历。这些女性主要接受子宫切开术、清宫术或甲氨蝶呤治疗。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析和逻辑回归分析来评估与治疗失败相关的因素。

结果

90例患者中,44例行子宫切开术,18例行清宫术,28例接受甲氨蝶呤治疗。子宫切开术的成功率为100%(44/44),清宫术为83%(15/18),甲氨蝶呤为57%(16/28)(P<0.001)。ROC曲线分析表明,妊娠时长8周和平均孕囊直径(MSD)4 cm均提示初次清宫术和甲氨蝶呤治疗失败。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,MSD≥4 cm是治疗失败的唯一独立危险因素(比值比68.99,95%置信区间6.27 - 759.60;P = 0.001)。

结论

初次子宫切开术适用于任何大小的CSP治疗。当MSD大于4 cm时,初次清宫术或甲氨蝶呤治疗通常会失败。

相似文献

1
Risk factors associated with failure of treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy.与剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗失败相关的危险因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;138(1):28-36. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12157. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
2
Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial.宫腔镜切除术与超声引导下扩张刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠的随机临床试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):437.e1-437.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.038. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy treated with local methotrexate injection.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠局部注射甲氨蝶呤的结局。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;82(1):15-23. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.82.1.15.
4
Assessment of transvaginal hysterotomy combined with medication for cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.经阴道子宫切开术联合药物治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的评估。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):639-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.06.006.
5
Successful medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies with systemic multidose methotrexate: single-center experience.全身多剂量甲氨蝶呤成功治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠:单中心经验
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jun;40(6):1700-6. doi: 10.1111/jog.12414.
6
Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: Incidence and Factors Associated with Conversion to Surgery from Medical Management.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠:从药物治疗转为手术治疗的发生率及相关因素。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):919-927. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.771. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
7
New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的新超声分级系统及其对管理策略的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202020. eCollection 2018.
8
Caesarean scar pregnancy: hysterotomy is rapid and safe management option.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:子宫切开术是一种快速且安全的治疗选择。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Aug;290(2):381-3. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3206-8. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
9
Local management with methotrexate of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with live embryo guided by transvaginal ultrasound: A case report.经阴道超声引导下甲氨蝶呤局部治疗带活胎的剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠:一例报告
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016 Apr;62(2):184-5. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.62.02.184.
10
Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.宫腔镜在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中的处理。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):1735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.099. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Suture-Mediated Delivery System Reduces the Incidence of Uterine Scarring Through the TGF-β Pathway.缝线介导的递送系统通过TGF-β途径降低子宫瘢痕形成的发生率。
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Feb 7;16(2):52. doi: 10.3390/jfb16020052.
2
MRI-based scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.基于 MRI 的评分模型预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者刮宫术中大出血。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Oct;48(10):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03968-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Selection of Laparoscopy or Laparotomy for Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study.
腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的选择:一项回顾性研究
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Sep 13;15:7229-7240. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S369884. eCollection 2022.
4
The Efficacy and Health Economics of Different Treatments for Type 1 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.不同治疗方法对Ⅰ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效及卫生经济学分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 28;13:822319. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.822319. eCollection 2022.
5
New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的新超声分级系统及其对管理策略的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202020. eCollection 2018.