• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的新超声分级系统及其对管理策略的影响:一项观察性队列研究。

New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Public Health, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202020. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202020
PMID:30092014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6084953/
Abstract

A cesarean section pregnancy (CSP) indicated the gestational sac (GS) implanted in the previous cesarean scar. The clinical manifestations of CSP present a wide range of variations, and the optimal management is yet to be defined. We retrospectively enrolled 109 patients with the diagnosis of CSP from our department and categorized them into four grades based on the ultrasound presentation. Grade I CSP indicated the GS embedded in less than one-half thickness of the lower anterior corpus; and grade II CSP represented the GS extended to more than one-half thickness of overlying myometrium. Grade III CSP implied the GS bulged out of the cesarean scar; and grade IV CSP denoted that GS became an amorphous tumor with rich vascularity at the cesarean scar. Seventy-eight women received surgery, and the complication rate was 14.1% (11/78). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between the invasiveness of the surgery and their ultrasound gradings. The mainstream operation for grade I CSP was transcervical resection, while the majority of grade III and IV patients required hysterotomy or hysterectomy. Another 31 women received chemotherapy with methotrexate as their initial treatment. The success rate for chemotherapy was 61.3%; the remaining patients required further surgery due to persistent CSP or heavy bleeding during or after chemotherapy. Fifteen patients (48.3%) receiving chemotherapy suffered from complications (mostly bleeding). Among them, 7 (22.6%) patients experienced bleeding of more than 1,000 mL, and 9 (29.0%) of these 31 patients required blood transfusions. Our novel ultrasound grading system for CSP may help to communicate between physicians, and determine the optimal surgical strategy. Chemotherapy with methotrexate for CSP is not satisfactory and is associated with a higher rate of complications.

摘要

剖宫产术后妊娠(CSP)是指孕囊(GS)着床于既往剖宫产瘢痕处。CSP 的临床表现差异较大,其最佳管理方法尚未确定。我们回顾性地纳入了我科 109 例 CSP 患者,并根据超声表现将其分为四级。I 级 CSP 指 GS 埋入前壁下段肌层厚度<1/2;II 级 CSP 指 GS 延伸至超过前壁下段肌层厚度的 1/2;III 级 CSP 指 GS 自剖宫产瘢痕处向外突出;IV 级 CSP 指 GS 在剖宫产瘢痕处呈不规则团块状,血流丰富。78 例患者接受了手术治疗,并发症发生率为 14.1%(11/78)。线性回归分析表明,手术的侵袭性与超声分级显著相关。I 级 CSP 的主流手术方式为经宫颈切除,而大部分 III 级和 IV 级患者需要行剖宫产切口切开或子宫切除术。另有 31 例患者接受甲氨蝶呤化疗作为初始治疗。化疗的成功率为 61.3%;其余患者因 CSP 持续存在或化疗期间或之后大出血而需要进一步手术。31 例接受化疗的患者中有 15 例(48.3%)发生并发症(多为出血)。其中,7 例(22.6%)患者出血量超过 1000ml,9 例(29.0%)患者需要输血。我们提出的 CSP 超声分级新系统有助于医患之间的沟通,并确定最佳的手术策略。CSP 采用甲氨蝶呤化疗效果并不理想,且与较高的并发症发生率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/6084953/fa8448d18d0c/pone.0202020.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/6084953/dc5e3b11cb22/pone.0202020.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/6084953/da6fc482e038/pone.0202020.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/6084953/fa8448d18d0c/pone.0202020.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/6084953/dc5e3b11cb22/pone.0202020.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/6084953/da6fc482e038/pone.0202020.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/6084953/fa8448d18d0c/pone.0202020.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的新超声分级系统及其对管理策略的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202020. eCollection 2018.
2
Transvaginal methotrexate injection for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and subsequent fecundity.经阴道甲氨蝶呤注射治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:疗效及后续生育力
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
3
Conservative cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: local methotrexate injection followed by hysteroscopic removal with hysteroscopic tissue removal system.保守性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗:局部注射甲氨蝶呤后行宫腔镜下妊娠组织清除术。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1417-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.034. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
4
[Management of cesarean scar pregnancy by hysteroscopy combined with uterine artery embolism].宫腔镜联合子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;46(8):591-4.
5
The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的宫腔镜治疗价值:44例报告
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;56(2):139-142. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.020.
6
Analysis of cases with cesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病例分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Jan;39(1):195-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01892.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
7
Systematic evaluation of the efficacy of treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗效果的系统评价。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Jul 18;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01256-0.
8
Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.超声引导下刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):707-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
9
Experience in management of cesarean scar pregnancy and outcomes in a single center.单一中心剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的管理经验及结局。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Oct;50(10):3000605221123875. doi: 10.1177/03000605221123875.
10
Multiple-dose methotrexate for pregnancy in a cesarean section scar. A case report.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的多剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗。病例报告。
J Reprod Med. 2002 Apr;47(4):332-4.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoring system predicts the adverse outcomes for cesarean scar pregnancy treated with transvaginal hysterotomy.一种评分系统可预测经阴道子宫切开术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的不良结局。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):5086-5100. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1337. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
2
Pituitrin Injection before Hysteroscopic Curettage for Treating Type I Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in Comparison with Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Study.宫腔镜刮宫术前垂体后叶素注射与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗Ⅰ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的对比:一项回顾性研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Jun;73(3):229-234. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01724-w. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Different or Similar?剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与胎盘植入:不同还是相似?
Isr Med Assoc J. 2017 Mar;19(3):168-171.
2
A large intrauterine vascular lesion developing after the successful treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy with methotrexate injection.甲氨蝶呤注射成功治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠后出现的巨大子宫内血管病变。
J Clin Ultrasound. 2018 Mar;46(3):222-226. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22490. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
Risk factors associated with failure of treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy.与剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗失败相关的危险因素。
Analysis of risk factors for patients with cesarean scar pregnancy treated with methotrexate combined with suction curettage.
甲氨蝶呤联合吸宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的危险因素分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;308(3):913-918. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07049-x. Epub 2023 May 2.
4
Interventional Challenges in Non-Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy.非输卵管异位妊娠的介入治疗挑战
J Family Reprod Health. 2022 Mar;16(1):78-85. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v16i1.8597.
5
Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method.早孕期剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的定义及超声报告系统:改良 Delphi 法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;59(4):437-449. doi: 10.1002/uog.24815.
6
Ectopic uterine scar pregnancy: A case report.子宫瘢痕部位妊娠:一例报告。
Ultrasound. 2021 Feb;29(1):57-63. doi: 10.1177/1742271X20933918. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
7
A comparison between laparoscopy and hysteroscopy approach in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.腹腔镜与宫腔镜治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22845. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022845.
8
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Successfully Managed to Term: When the Patient Is Determined to Keep the Pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠成功维持至足月:当患者决定继续妊娠时。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Sep 24;56(10):496. doi: 10.3390/medicina56100496.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;138(1):28-36. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12157. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Clinical classification and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床分类与治疗
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Apr;43(4):653-661. doi: 10.1111/jog.13267. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
5
A new minimally invasive treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy and cervical pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠和宫颈妊娠的一种新的微创治疗方法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):351.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
6
Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:治疗研究的系统评价
Fertil Steril. 2016 Apr;105(4):958-67. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage.超声引导下吸引刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的疗效及安全性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):511-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.15857.
8
Uterine artery embolization combined with curettage vs. methotrexate plus curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy.子宫动脉栓塞联合刮宫术与甲氨蝶呤加刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的对比
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jul;294(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3952-2. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
9
Successful Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Complicated by an Arteriovenous Malformation.成功处理合并动静脉畸形的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Ochsner J. 2015 Fall;15(3):268-71.
10
Therapeutic effects of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and methotrexate (MTX) conservative therapy used in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)保守治疗用于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;293(4):819-23. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3881-0. Epub 2015 Sep 19.