• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Regression-Based Norms for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in the Dutch Population: Improving Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis?荷兰人群中符号数字模式测验基于回归的常模:能否改善多发性硬化症认知障碍的检测?
Eur Neurol. 2017;77(5-6):246-252. doi: 10.1159/000464405. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
2
Reliability of regression-based normative data for the oral symbol digit modalities test: an evaluation of demographic influences, construct validity, and impairment classification rates in multiple sclerosis samples.基于回归的口头符号数字模态测试的参考数据的可靠性:在多发性硬化症样本中评估人口统计学影响、结构有效性和损伤分类率。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(2):281-99. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2013.871337. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
A preliminary validation of the brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS) tool in an Irish population with multiple sclerosis (MS).多发性硬化症简短国际认知评估工具(BICAMS)在爱尔兰多发性硬化症(MS)患者群体中的初步验证。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Nov;4(6):521-5. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
4
The Symbol Digit Modalities Test is an effective cognitive screen in pediatric onset multiple sclerosis (MS).符号数字模式测验是小儿多发性硬化症(MS)一种有效的认知筛查工具。
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Jun 15;341(1-2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
5
The Symbol Digit Modalities Test as sentinel test for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.符号数字模态测验作为多发性硬化症认知障碍的哨兵测试。
Eur J Neurol. 2014 Sep;21(9):1219-25, e71-2. doi: 10.1111/ene.12463. Epub 2014 May 22.
6
The Brief International Cognitive Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS): results from the German validation study.多发性硬化症的简短国际认知评估(BICAMS):德国验证研究结果。
J Neurol. 2018 Nov;265(11):2587-2593. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9034-1. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
7
Repeated assessment of neuropsychological deficits in multiple sclerosis using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test and the MS Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire.使用符号数字模式测验和多发性硬化症神经心理学筛查问卷对多发性硬化症患者的神经心理学缺陷进行重复评估。
Mult Scler. 2008 Aug;14(7):940-6. doi: 10.1177/1352458508090923. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
8
Performance of Regression-Based Norms for Cognitive Functioning of Persons With Multiple Sclerosis in an Independent Sample.基于回归的多发性硬化症患者认知功能常模在独立样本中的表现。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 14;11:621010. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.621010. eCollection 2020.
9
Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS): Canadian contribution to the international validation project.多发性硬化症简短国际认知评估(BICAMS):加拿大对国际验证项目的贡献。
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Mar 15;362:147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.040. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
A one-year follow-up study of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an appraisal of comparative longitudinal sensitivity.复发缓解型多发性硬化症中符号数字模式测验(SDMT)和听觉序列加法测验(PASAT)的一年随访研究:比较纵向敏感性评估
BMC Neurol. 2015 Mar 22;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0296-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Generating fair, reliable, and accurate neuropsychological test norms for people with HIV in a low- or middle-income country.为低收入或中等收入国家的艾滋病毒感染者制定公平、可靠且准确的神经心理学测试常模。
J Neurovirol. 2025 Feb;31(1):41-55. doi: 10.1007/s13365-024-01235-6. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Continuous Norming Approaches: A Systematic Review and Real Data Example.连续常态化方法:系统评价与实际数据示例
Assessment. 2025 Jul;32(5):654-674. doi: 10.1177/10731911241260545. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
3
Prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): A systematic review and meta-analysis.多发性硬化症(MS)患者认知障碍(CI)的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2024 Summer;15(3):392-413. doi: 10.22088/cjim.15.3.392.
4
Automated procedure for demographic adjustments on cognitive test scores.认知测试分数人口统计学调整的自动化程序。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023 Dec 5:1-10. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2288231.
5
Normative Data Estimation in Neuropsychological Tests: A Systematic Review.神经心理学测试中的常模数据估计:一项系统综述。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr 24;39(3):383-398. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acad084.
6
Recent Advances in Neuropsychological Test Interpretation for Clinical Practice.临床实践中神经心理学测试解释的最新进展。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Jun;34(2):637-667. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09596-1. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
7
Parkinson's Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS): Normative Data and Mild Cognitive Impairment Assessment in Brazil.帕金森病认知评定量表(PD-CRS):巴西的常模数据及轻度认知障碍评估
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023 Feb 25;10(3):452-465. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13657. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Validation of Discrete and Regression-Based Performance and Cognitive Fatigability Normative Data for the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test in Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症中听觉序列加法测试的离散及基于回归的表现与认知疲劳性标准数据的验证
Front Neurosci. 2021 Nov 15;15:730817. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.730817. eCollection 2021.
9
Normative Data for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in Older White Australians and Americans, African-Americans, and Hispanic/Latinos.澳大利亚和美国老年白人、非裔美国人以及西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群符号数字模式测验的常模数据。
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2020 Aug 4;4(1):313-323. doi: 10.3233/ADR-200194.
10
Neurosonological and cognitive screening for evaluation of systemic sclerosis patients.神经超声和认知筛查评估系统性硬化症患者。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;38(7):1905-1916. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04468-7. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlations between MRI and Information Processing Speed in MS: A Meta-Analysis.多发性硬化症中MRI与信息处理速度的相关性:一项荟萃分析。
Mult Scler Int. 2014;2014:975803. doi: 10.1155/2014/975803. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
2
Reliability of regression-based normative data for the oral symbol digit modalities test: an evaluation of demographic influences, construct validity, and impairment classification rates in multiple sclerosis samples.基于回归的口头符号数字模态测试的参考数据的可靠性:在多发性硬化症样本中评估人口统计学影响、结构有效性和损伤分类率。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(2):281-99. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2013.871337. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
Comparing long-term results of PASAT and SDMT scores in relation to neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis.比较 PASAT 和 SDMT 评分与多发性硬化症神经心理学测试的长期结果。
Mult Scler. 2014 Apr;20(4):481-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458513501570. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
4
Sex-specific extent and severity of white matter damage in multiple sclerosis: implications for cognitive decline.多发性硬化症中白质损伤的性别特异性程度和严重程度:对认知衰退的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):2348-58. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22332. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
5
Cognitive impairment in MS: impact of white matter integrity, gray matter volume, and lesions.多发性硬化症中的认知障碍:与脑白质完整性、脑灰质体积和病变的关系。
Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11):1025-32. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726cc. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Subcortical atrophy and cognition: sex effects in multiple sclerosis.皮质下萎缩与认知:多发性硬化症中的性别效应。
Neurology. 2012 Oct 23;79(17):1754-61. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182703f46. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
7
Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation.多发性硬化症的简短国际认知评估(BICAMS):验证的国际标准。
BMC Neurol. 2012 Jul 16;12:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-55.
8
Recommendations for a Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS).多发性硬化症简短国际认知评估建议(BICAMS)。
Mult Scler. 2012 Jun;18(6):891-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458511431076. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
9
Functional connectivity changes in multiple sclerosis patients: a graph analytical study of MEG resting state data.多发性硬化症患者的功能连接变化:基于脑磁图静息态数据的图分析研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jan;34(1):52-61. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21424. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
10
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.多发性硬化症的诊断标准:2010 年麦克唐纳标准修订版。
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302. doi: 10.1002/ana.22366.

荷兰人群中符号数字模式测验基于回归的常模:能否改善多发性硬化症认知障碍的检测?

Regression-Based Norms for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in the Dutch Population: Improving Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis?

作者信息

Burggraaff Jessica, Knol Dirk L, Uitdehaag Bernard M J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Neurol. 2017;77(5-6):246-252. doi: 10.1159/000464405. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1159/000464405
PMID:28319952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5516407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Appropriate and timely screening instruments that sensitively capture the cognitive functioning of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are the need of the hour. We evaluated newly derived regression-based norms for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) in a Dutch-speaking sample, as an indicator of the cognitive state of MS patients.

METHODS

Regression-based norms for the SDMT were created from a healthy control sample (n = 96) and used to convert MS patients' (n = 157) raw scores to demographically adjusted Z-scores, correcting for the effects of age, age2, gender, and education. Conventional and regression-based norms were compared on their impairment-classification rates and related to other neuropsychological measures.

RESULTS

The regression analyses revealed that age was the only significantly influencing demographic in our healthy sample. Regression-based norms for the SDMT more readily detected impairment in MS patients than conventional normalization methods (32 patients instead of 15). Patients changing from an SDMT-preserved to -impaired status (n = 17) were also impaired on other cognitive domains (p < 0.05), except for visuospatial memory (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Regression-based norms for the SDMT more readily detect abnormal performance in MS patients than conventional norms, identifying those patients at highest risk for cognitive impairment, which was supported by a worse performance on other neuropsychological measures.

摘要

背景/目的:当下急需合适且及时的筛查工具,以灵敏地捕捉多发性硬化症(MS)患者的认知功能。我们在一个说荷兰语的样本中评估了新得出的基于回归的符号数字模态测验(SDMT)常模,作为MS患者认知状态的指标。

方法

基于回归的SDMT常模由一个健康对照样本(n = 96)建立,并用于将MS患者(n = 157)的原始分数转换为经人口统计学调整的Z分数,校正年龄、年龄平方、性别和教育程度的影响。比较了传统常模和基于回归的常模的损伤分类率,并将其与其他神经心理学测量指标相关联。

结果

回归分析显示,在我们的健康样本中,年龄是唯一具有显著影响的人口统计学因素。与传统的标准化方法相比,基于回归的SDMT常模能更轻易地检测出MS患者的损伤(32例患者,而非15例)。从SDMT未受损转变为受损状态的患者(n = 17)在其他认知领域也存在损伤(p < 0.05),视觉空间记忆除外(p = 0.34)。

结论

与传统常模相比,基于回归的SDMT常模能更轻易地检测出MS患者的异常表现,识别出认知损伤风险最高的患者,这一点得到了其他神经心理学测量指标较差表现的支持。