Carvalho Annelise, Chu Jennifer, Meinguet Céline, Kiss Robert, Vandenbussche Guy, Masereel Bernard, Wouters Johan, Kornienko Alexander, Pelletier Jerry, Mathieu Véronique
Laboratoire de Cancérologie et Toxicologie Expérimentale, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 15;805:25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.03.034. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
Growing evidence indicates that protein synthesis is deregulated in cancer onset and progression and targeting this process might be a selective way to combat cancers. While harmine is known to inhibit DYRK1A and intercalate into the DNA, tri-substitution was shown previously to modify its activity profile in favor of protein synthesis inhibition. In this study, we thus evaluated the optimized derivative CM16 in vitro anti-cancer effects unfolding its protein synthesis inhibition activity. Indeed, the growth inhibitory profile of CM16 in the NCI 60-cancer-cell-line-panel correlated with those of other compounds described as protein synthesis inhibitors. Accordingly, CM16 decreased in a time- and concentration-dependent manner the translation of neosynthesized proteins in vitro while it did not affect mRNA transcription. CM16 rapidly penetrated into the cell in the perinuclear region of the endoplasmic reticulum where it appears to target translation initiation as highlighted by ribosomal disorganization. More precisely, we found that the mRNA expression levels of the initiation factors EIF1AX, EIF3E and EIF3H differ when comparing resistant or sensitive cell models to CM16. Additionally, CM16 induced eIF2α phosphorylation. Those effects could explain, at least partly, the CM16 cytostatic anti-cancer effects observed in vitro while neither cell cycle arrest nor DNA intercalation could be demonstrated. Therefore, targeting protein synthesis initiation with CM16 could represent a new promising alternative to current cancer therapies due to the specific alterations of the translation machinery in cancer cells as recently evidenced with respect to EIF1AX and eIF3 complex, the potential targets identified in this present study.
越来越多的证据表明,蛋白质合成在癌症的发生和发展过程中失调,针对这一过程可能是对抗癌症的一种选择性方法。虽然已知 harmine 可抑制 DYRK1A 并插入 DNA,但先前已表明三取代可改变其活性谱,有利于蛋白质合成抑制。因此,在本研究中,我们评估了优化衍生物 CM16 的体外抗癌作用,揭示其蛋白质合成抑制活性。事实上,CM16 在 NCI 60 癌细胞系面板中的生长抑制谱与其他被描述为蛋白质合成抑制剂的化合物的谱相关。相应地,CM16 在体外以时间和浓度依赖性方式降低新合成蛋白质的翻译,而不影响 mRNA 转录。CM16 迅速渗透到内质网的核周区域的细胞中,在那里它似乎靶向翻译起始,核糖体紊乱突出了这一点。更确切地说,我们发现,在比较对 CM16 耐药或敏感的细胞模型时,起始因子 EIF1AX、EIF3E 和 EIF3H 的 mRNA 表达水平有所不同。此外,CM16 诱导 eIF2α 磷酸化。这些作用至少可以部分解释在体外观察到的 CM16 的细胞生长抑制抗癌作用,而既未证明有细胞周期停滞也未证明有 DNA 插入。因此,由于癌细胞中翻译机制的特定改变,如最近关于 EIF1AX 和 eIF3 复合物所证明的,本研究中确定的潜在靶点,用 CM16 靶向蛋白质合成起始可能代表了一种有前景的新的癌症治疗替代方法。