• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前椎体后移作为腰椎管狭窄症中央减压术后因迟发性症状性椎间孔狭窄而再次手术的预测风险因素,未行融合术。

Preoperative retrolisthesis as a predictive risk factor of reoperation due to delayed-onset symptomatic foraminal stenosis after central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis without fusion.

作者信息

Ikegami Daisuke, Hosono Noboru, Mukai Yoshihiro, Tateishi Kosuke, Fuji Takeshi

机构信息

Orthopedic Surgery, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital, 4-2-78 Fukushima, Osaka 553-0003, Japan.

Orthopedic Surgery, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital, 4-2-78 Fukushima, Osaka 553-0003, Japan.

出版信息

Spine J. 2017 Aug;17(8):1066-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.006
PMID:28323238
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

For patients diagnosed with lumbar central canal stenosis with asymptomatic foraminal stenosis (FS), surgeons occasionally only decompress central stenosis and preserve asymptomatic FS. These surgeries have the potential risk of converting preoperative asymptomatic FS into symptomatic FS postoperatively by accelerating spinal degeneration, which requires reoperation. However, little is known about delayed-onset symptomatic FS postoperatively.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the rate of reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS after lumbar central canal decompression in patients with preoperative asymptomatic FS, and determine the predictive risk factors of those reoperations.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing posterior central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis between January 2009 and June 2014 were included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of patients who had preoperative FS and the reoperation rate for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at the index levels were the outcome measures.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups with and without preoperative asymptomatic FS at the decompressed levels. The baseline characteristics and revision rates for delayed-onset symptomatic FS were compared between the two groups. Predictive risk factors for such reoperations were determined using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 118 patients (56.7%) had asymptomatic FS. Of those, 18 patients (15.3%) underwent reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at a mean of 1.9 years after the initial surgery. Posterior slip in neutral position and posterior extension-neutral translation were significant risk factors for reoperation due to FS. The optimal cutoff values of posterior slip in neutral position and posterior extension-neutral translation for predicting the occurrence of such reoperations were both 1 mm; 66.7% of patients who met both of these cutoff values had undergone reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that 15.3% of patients with preoperative asymptomatic FS underwent reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at the index levels at a mean of 1.9 years after central decompression, and preoperative retrolisthesis was a predictive risk factor for such a reoperation. These findings are valuable for establishing standards of appropriate treatment strategies in patients with lumbar central canal stenosis with asymptomatic FS.

摘要

背景

对于诊断为腰椎中央管狭窄合并无症状椎间孔狭窄(FS)的患者,外科医生有时仅对中央管狭窄进行减压,并保留无症状的椎间孔狭窄。这些手术存在通过加速脊柱退变将术前无症状的椎间孔狭窄转变为术后有症状的椎间孔狭窄的潜在风险,这需要再次手术。然而,关于术后迟发性有症状的椎间孔狭窄知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在评估术前无症状椎间孔狭窄患者腰椎中央管减压术后迟发性有症状椎间孔狭窄的再次手术率,并确定这些再次手术的预测风险因素。

研究设计

本研究为回顾性队列研究。

患者样本

纳入2009年1月至2014年6月期间连续208例因腰椎管狭窄接受后路中央减压的患者。

观察指标

观察指标为术前有椎间孔狭窄的患者数量以及索引节段迟发性有症状椎间孔狭窄的再次手术率。

方法

将患者分为减压节段术前有无症状椎间孔狭窄两组。比较两组的基线特征和迟发性有症状椎间孔狭窄的翻修率。使用多因素逻辑回归和受试者工作特征分析确定此类再次手术的预测风险因素。

结果

术前,118例患者(56.7%)有无症状椎间孔狭窄。其中,18例患者(15.3%)在初次手术后平均1.9年因迟发性有症状椎间孔狭窄接受了再次手术。中立位后滑脱和后伸 - 中立位平移是因椎间孔狭窄再次手术的显著风险因素。中立位后滑脱和后伸 - 中立位平移预测此类再次手术发生的最佳截断值均为1毫米;同时满足这两个截断值的患者中有66.7%接受了再次手术。

结论

本研究表明,15.3%术前无症状椎间孔狭窄的患者在中央管减压术后平均1.9年因索引节段迟发性有症状椎间孔狭窄接受了再次手术,术前椎体后滑脱是此类再次手术的预测风险因素。这些发现对于为腰椎中央管狭窄合并无症状椎间孔狭窄的患者制定适当的治疗策略标准具有重要价值。

相似文献

1
Preoperative retrolisthesis as a predictive risk factor of reoperation due to delayed-onset symptomatic foraminal stenosis after central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis without fusion.术前椎体后移作为腰椎管狭窄症中央减压术后因迟发性症状性椎间孔狭窄而再次手术的预测风险因素,未行融合术。
Spine J. 2017 Aug;17(8):1066-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
2
Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.退行性与先天性椎管狭窄症中稳定性保留减压术:人口统计学模式与患者预后
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1420-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.031. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
3
Increased risk of symptomatic progression of instability following decompression for lumbar canal stenosis in patients receiving chronic glucocorticoids therapy.接受慢性糖皮质激素治疗的患者,腰椎管狭窄减压术后不稳定症状进展风险增加。
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Jan;24(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation.术前椎体后移作为减压术后腰椎间盘突出症的一个危险因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Apr;24(4):592-601. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.SPINE15288. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
5
Rate of revision surgery after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.单纯外侧腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症后的翻修手术率
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 1;39(5):E326-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000141.
6
Clinical and radiological outcomes of microscopic partial pediculectomy for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis.显微镜下部分椎弓根切除术治疗退变性腰椎椎间孔狭窄症的临床及影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):E723-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828f4e12.
7
Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.腰椎管狭窄症手术无脊椎滑脱的再手术率:一项全国性队列研究。
Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
8
Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎Ⅰ度滑脱减压未融合术后迟发性不稳定的影像学预测因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Apr;18(4):340-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
9
Microsurgical unilateral laminotomy for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results and predictive factors.显微外科单侧椎板切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症减压:长期结果及预测因素
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Jun;158(6):1103-13. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2804-6. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
Reoperation rates and risk factors for revision 4 years after dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine.腰椎动态稳定术后 4 年的再次手术率及相关风险因素。
Spine J. 2019 Jan;19(1):113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.经棘突矢状劈开保留肌肉的后路腰椎减压术的中期结果:至少 5 年随访。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Oct;15(5):800-808. doi: 10.4055/cios22362. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, 2021: 5. Postoperative Prognosis.《2021年腰椎管狭窄症临床实践指南精要:5. 术后预后》
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023 Jul 27;7(4):314-318. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2022-0082.
3
Identification of preoperative radiological risk factors for reoperation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression to treat degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
经皮内镜下腰椎减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症术后再手术的术前影像学危险因素识别
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1054760. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1054760. eCollection 2022.
4
Reoperations After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Decompression for Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Incidence and Predictors.经皮内镜椎间孔减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症后的再次手术:发生率及预测因素
Global Spine J. 2023 Oct;13(8):2327-2335. doi: 10.1177/21925682221081030. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
5
Revision after spinal stenosis surgery.脊柱狭窄手术后的翻修。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Feb;29(Suppl 1):22-38. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06314-w. Epub 2020 Jan 29.