Chiarotti F, Viglione A, Giuliani A, Branchi I
Center for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 21;7(3):e1066. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.35.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the most commonly prescribed antidepressant drugs, have a variable and incomplete efficacy. In order to better understand SSRI action, we explored the hypothesis that SSRIs do not affect mood per se but amplify the influence of the living conditions on mood. To this aim, we exploited the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) data set, selected a subpopulation of 591 patients with an overlapping clinical history and analyzed treatment outcome according to dosage -20 or 40 mg per day of citalopram. We found that sociodemographic characteristics affected treatment response in the same direction in the two dose groups, but these effects reached statistical significance only in the 40 mg per day dose group. In the latter, higher improvement rate was associated with having a working employment status (P=0.0219), longer education (P=0.0053), high income (P=0.01) or a private insurance (P=0.0031), and the higher remission rate was associated with having a working employment status (P=0.0326) or longer education (P=0.0484). Moreover, the magnitude of the effect of the sociodemographic characteristics on mood, measured as the percent of patients showing a positive outcome when exposed to favorable living conditions, was much greater-up to 37-fold-in the 40 compared to the 20 mg per day dose group. Overall, our results indicate that citalopram amplifies the influence of the living conditions on mood in a dose-dependent manner. These findings provide a potential explanation for the variable efficacy of SSRIs and might lead to the development of personalized strategies aimed at enhancing their efficacy.
选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)是最常用的抗抑郁药物,其疗效不一且不完全。为了更好地理解SSRIs的作用机制,我们探讨了这样一个假设:SSRIs本身并不影响情绪,而是放大生活条件对情绪的影响。为此,我们利用了缓解抑郁的序贯治疗替代方案(STAR*D)数据集,选择了591名具有重叠临床病史的患者亚组,并根据西酞普兰每天20或40毫克的剂量分析治疗结果。我们发现,社会人口统计学特征在两个剂量组中对治疗反应的影响方向相同,但这些影响仅在每天40毫克剂量组中达到统计学显著水平。在后者中,较高的改善率与在职工作状态(P = 0.0219)、受教育时间较长(P = 0.0053)、高收入(P = 0.01)或拥有私人保险(P = 0.0031)相关,而较高的缓解率与在职工作状态(P = 0.0326)或受教育时间较长(P = 0.0484)相关。此外,与每天20毫克剂量组相比,社会人口统计学特征对情绪影响的程度(以在有利生活条件下显示积极结果的患者百分比衡量)在每天40毫克剂量组中要大得多,高达37倍。总体而言,我们的结果表明西酞普兰以剂量依赖的方式放大了生活条件对情绪的影响。这些发现为SSRIs疗效不一提供了一个潜在的解释,并可能导致旨在提高其疗效的个性化策略的发展。