Robbins Hilary A, Strickler Howard D, Massad L Stewart, Pierce Christopher B, Darragh Teresa M, Minkoff Howard, Keller Marla J, Fischl Margaret, Palefsky Joel, Flowers Lisa, Rahangdale Lisa, Milam Joel, Shrestha Sadeep, Colie Christine, DʼSouza Gypsyamber
aJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland bAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York City, New York cWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri dUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California eMaimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York City, New York fUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida gGrady Memorial Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia hUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina iUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California jUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama kGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
AIDS. 2017 Apr 24;31(7):1035-1044. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001450.
We suggested cervical cancer screening strategies for women living with HIV (WLHIV) by comparing their precancer risks to general population women, and then compared our suggestions with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines.
We compared risks of biopsy-confirmed cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (bHSIL+), calculated among WLHIV in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, to 'risk benchmarks' for specific management strategies in the general population.
We applied parametric survival models among 2423 WLHIV with negative or atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology during 2000-2015. Separately, we synthesized published general population bHSIL+ risks to generate 3-year risk benchmarks for a 3-year return (after negative cytology, i.e. 'rescreening threshold'), a 6-12-month return (after ASC-US), and immediate colposcopy [after low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)].
Average 3-year bHSIL+ risks among general population women ('risk benchmarks') were 0.69% for a 3-year return (after negative cytology), 8.8% for a 6-12-month return (after ASC-US), and 14.4% for colposcopy (after LSIL). Most CDC guidelines for WLHIV were supported by comparing risks in WLHIV to these benchmarks, including a 3-year return with CD4 greater than 500 cells/μl and after either three negative cytology tests or a negative cytology/oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (all 3-year risks≤1.3%); a 1-year return after negative cytology with either positive oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (1-year risk = 1.0%) or CD4 cell count less than 500 cells/μl (1-year risk = 1.1%); and a 6-12-month return after ASC-US (3-year risk = 8.2% if CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/μl; 10.4% if CD4 cell count = 350-499 cells/μl). Other suggestions differed modestly from current guidelines, including colposcopy (vs. 6-12 month return) for WLHIV with ASC-US and CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μl (3-year risk = 16.4%) and a lengthened 2-year (vs. 1-year) interval after negative cytology with CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/μl (2-year risk = 0.98%).
Current cervical cancer screening guidelines for WLHIV are largely appropriate. CD4 cell count may inform risk-tailored strategies.
通过比较感染艾滋病毒的女性(WLHIV)与普通人群女性的癌前风险,我们提出了针对WLHIV的宫颈癌筛查策略,然后将我们的建议与美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的现行指南进行比较。
我们将女性机构间艾滋病毒研究中经活检确诊的宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内瘤变或更严重病变(bHSIL+)的风险,与普通人群中特定管理策略的“风险基准”进行比较。
我们对2000年至2015年间2423例细胞学检查为阴性或意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)的WLHIV应用参数生存模型。另外,我们综合已发表的普通人群bHSIL+风险,以生成3年回报(细胞学检查阴性后,即“重新筛查阈值”)、6至12个月回报(ASC-US后)以及立即进行阴道镜检查[低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)后]的3年风险基准。
普通人群女性的平均3年bHSIL+风险(“风险基准”)为:3年回报(细胞学检查阴性后)为0.69%,6至12个月回报(ASC-US后)为8.8%,阴道镜检查(LSIL后)为14.4%。通过将WLHIV的风险与这些基准进行比较,CDC针对WLHIV的大多数指南得到了支持,包括CD4大于500个细胞/μl且在三次阴性细胞学检查或阴性细胞学/致癌性人乳头瘤病毒联合检测后进行3年回报(所有3年风险≤1.3%);致癌性人乳头瘤病毒联合检测阳性(1年风险=1.0%)或CD4细胞计数低于500个细胞/μl(1年风险=1.1%)时,细胞学检查阴性后1年回报;ASC-US后6至12个月回报(如果CD4细胞计数至少为500个细胞/μl,3年风险=8.2%;如果CD4细胞计数=350 - 499个细胞/μl,3年风险=10.4%)。其他建议与现行指南略有不同,包括ASC-US且CD4细胞计数低于350个细胞/μl的WLHIV进行阴道镜检查(而非6至12个月回报)(3年风险=16.4%),以及CD4细胞计数至少为500个细胞/μl时,细胞学检查阴性后延长至2年(而非1年)的间隔(2年风险=0.98%)。
现行针对WLHIV的宫颈癌筛查指南在很大程度上是合适的。CD4细胞计数可为风险定制策略提供参考。