Obalum S E, Chibuike G U, Peth S, Ouyang Y
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, 410001, Nigeria.
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Ecological Agriculture, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Apr;189(4):176. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5881-y. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
Soil organic matter (SOM) is known to play vital roles in the maintenance and improvement of many soil properties and processes. These roles, which largely influence soil functions, are a pool of specific contributions of different components of SOM. The soil functions, in turn, normally define the level of soil degradation, viewed as quantifiable temporal changes in a soil that impairs its quality. This paper aims at providing a generalized assessment of the current state of knowledge on the usefulness of SOM in monitoring soil degradation, based on its influence on the physical, chemical and biological properties and processes of soils. Emphasis is placed particularly on the effect of SOM on soil structure and availability of plant nutrients. Although these properties are discussed separately, the soil system is of dynamic and interactive nature, and changes in one property will likely affect other soil properties as well. Thus, functions of SOM almost always affect various soil properties and processes and engage in multiple reactions. In view of its role in soil aggregation and erosion control, in availability of plant nutrients and in ameliorating other forms of soil degradation than erosion, SOM has proven to be an important indicator of soil degradation. It has been suggested, however, that rather than the absolute amount, temporal change and potential amount of SOM be considered in its use as indicator of soil degradation, and that SOM may not be an all-purpose indicator. Whilst SOM remains a candidate without substitute as long as a one-parameter indicator of soil degradation is needed, narrowing down to the use of its labile and microbial components could be more appropriate, since early detection is important in the control and management of soil degradation.
土壤有机质(SOM)在维持和改善许多土壤性质及过程中发挥着至关重要的作用。这些作用在很大程度上影响着土壤功能,是土壤有机质不同组分的一系列特定贡献。反过来,土壤功能通常定义了土壤退化的程度,土壤退化被视为土壤中损害其质量的可量化的时间变化。本文旨在基于土壤有机质对土壤物理、化学和生物学性质及过程的影响,对当前关于土壤有机质在监测土壤退化方面有用性的知识现状进行综合评估。特别强调了土壤有机质对土壤结构和植物养分有效性的影响。尽管这些性质是分开讨论的,但土壤系统具有动态和相互作用的性质,一种性质的变化可能也会影响其他土壤性质。因此,土壤有机质的功能几乎总是会影响各种土壤性质和过程,并参与多种反应。鉴于其在土壤团聚和侵蚀控制、植物养分有效性以及改善除侵蚀之外的其他形式土壤退化方面的作用,土壤有机质已被证明是土壤退化的一个重要指标。然而,有人建议,在将土壤有机质用作土壤退化指标时,应考虑的不是其绝对含量,而是其时间变化和潜在含量,并且土壤有机质可能不是一个万能指标。虽然只要需要一个单参数的土壤退化指标,土壤有机质仍然是无可替代的候选指标,但由于早期检测对土壤退化的控制和管理很重要,因此更适合缩小范围使用其易分解和微生物组分。