• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Q-SEA——一种用于对作为卫生技术评估一部分进行的伦理分析进行质量评估的工具。

Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments.

作者信息

Scott Anna Mae, Hofmann Björn, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea Iñaki, Bakke Lysdahl Kristin, Sandman Lars, Bombard Yvonne

机构信息

Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice (CREBP), Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

Institute for the Health Sciences, Norwegian University for Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway; Centre of Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar 15;13:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/hta000128. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3205/hta000128
PMID:28326147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5352988/
Abstract

Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations' websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains - the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue.

摘要

伦理问题评估是卫生技术评估(HTA)的重要组成部分。然而,就质量评估工具的存在而言,与HTA的其他领域(如临床或成本效益)相比,HTA伦理在方法学上尚不完善。为了在方法学上推进HTA伦理:(1)提出并详细阐述Q-SEA,这是首个用于伦理分析质量评估的工具;(2)将Q-SEA应用于HTA伦理的样本系统评价,以说明并促进其使用。为了制定Q-SEA工具的项目清单,我们系统回顾了HTA伦理方法学的文献,查阅了HTA组织的网站,并在两次为期两天的研讨会上征求了32位HTA伦理领域专家的意见。随后,我们通过将其应用于为HTA进行的伦理分析对Q-SEA进行了完善。Q-SEA工具由两个领域组成——过程领域和结果领域。过程领域由5个要素组成:研究问题、文献检索、纳入/排除标准、视角和伦理框架。结果领域由5个要素组成:完整性、偏差、影响、概念澄清和价值冲突。Q-SEA是HTA中首个用于伦理分析质量评估的工具。对该工具的进一步完善以提高其可用性的工作仍在继续。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e19/5352988/b96deb502ff1/HTA-13-02-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e19/5352988/b96deb502ff1/HTA-13-02-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e19/5352988/b96deb502ff1/HTA-13-02-t-001.jpg

相似文献

1
Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments.Q-SEA——一种用于对作为卫生技术评估一部分进行的伦理分析进行质量评估的工具。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar 15;13:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/hta000128. eCollection 2017.
2
QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ETHICS ANALYSES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSSESSMENT.卫生技术评估伦理分析的质量评估
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(5):362-369. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000556. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
3
Ethical soundness of health technology assessment reports in Islamic Republic of Iran.伊朗伊斯兰共和国卫生技术评估报告的伦理健全性。
East Mediterr Health J. 2023 Jul 31;29(7):524-529. doi: 10.26719/emhj.23.039.
4
Core competencies for ethics experts in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估领域伦理专家的核心能力。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Dec;36(6):534-539. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320001968. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
5
Steps toward improving ethical evaluation in health technology assessment: a proposed framework.改善卫生技术评估中伦理评估的步骤:一个提议的框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jun 6;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0118-0.
6
7
Harmonization of ethics in health technology assessment: a revision of the Socratic approach.卫生技术评估中的伦理协调:苏格拉底方法的修订
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jan;30(1):3-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000688.
8
Developing and piloting a context-specified ethics framework for health technology assessment: the South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage approach.为卫生技术评估制定并试行一个因地制宜的伦理框架:南非全民健康覆盖的价值观与伦理方法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Mar 8;38(1):e26. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000113.
9
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.医疗设备的卫生技术评估:有何不同?三个欧洲项目概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
10
ETHICS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.卫生技术评估中的伦理问题:系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(5):447-457. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000508. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Practices Related to Ethical Aspects in eHealth Evaluation Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review.电子健康评估研究中与伦理方面相关的审查实践:一项范围审查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 5;14:e60849. doi: 10.2196/60849.
2
When complexity matters: a step-by-step guide to incorporating a complexity perspective in guideline development for public health and health system interventions.当复杂性很重要时:在公共卫生和卫生系统干预措施指南制定中纳入复杂性观点的逐步指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01132-6.
3
The value of bioethical research: A qualitative literature analysis of researchers' statements.

本文引用的文献

1
QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ETHICS ANALYSES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSSESSMENT.卫生技术评估伦理分析的质量评估
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(5):362-369. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000556. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
2
Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions.复杂卫生干预措施卫生技术评估中的伦理分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Mar 22;17:16. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0099-z.
3
Assessment vs. appraisal of ethical aspects of health technology assessment: can the distinction be upheld?健康技术评估伦理方面的评估与评价:这种区分能否成立?
生物伦理研究的价值:研究人员观点的定性文献分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 29;14(7):e0220438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220438. eCollection 2019.
4
The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective.世界卫生组织-整合证据到决策框架第1.0版:整合世界卫生组织的规范和价值观以及复杂性视角。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000844. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000844. eCollection 2019.
5
In pursuit of goodness in bioethics: analysis of an exemplary article.追求生物伦理学中的善:对一篇典范性文章的分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 15;19(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0299-9.
6
What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews.规范性伦理文献综述使用哪些方法进行检索、选择、分析和综合?系统综述的深入结果。
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;6(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0661-x.
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2014 Nov 26;10:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/hta000121. eCollection 2014.
4
Social and ethical analysis in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中的社会与伦理分析
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 May;97 Suppl 5:S81-6.
5
Uterine transplantation.
Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1244-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
6
Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review.卫生技术评估中伦理考量评估的方法学指导文件:一项系统综述。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Apr;14(2):203-20. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.894464.
7
Overriding parents' medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature.推翻父母为其子女做出的医疗决策:规范性文献的系统综述
J Med Ethics. 2014 Jul;40(7):448-52. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101446.
8
Toward acceptance of uterus transplants.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Nov-Dec;42(6):12-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.90.
9
How to write a systematic review of reasons.如何撰写系统综述的理由部分。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb;38(2):121-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100096. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
10
Methods of synthesizing qualitative research studies for health technology assessment.健康技术评估中定性研究的综合方法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):384-90. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000389.