• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“有件事我们需要告诉你……”:通过互联网向老年人传达健康筛查结果。

"There Is Something We Need to Tell You…": Communicating Health-Screening Results to Older Adults via the Internet.

机构信息

1 Department of Communication Science, University of Twente , Enschede, Netherlands .

2 Biomedical Signals and Systems Group, University of Twente , Enschede, Netherlands .

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2017 Sep;23(9):741-746. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0210. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.2016.0210
PMID:28328387
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of online health screenings, guidelines describing how to communicate about a person's health need to be adapted for a digital setting. This study aimed to uncover older adults' preferences regarding such online messages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty older adults (aged 65 to 75 years) viewed four versions of the results message of a screening aimed at identifying frailty: a standard, empathic, tailored, or both empathic and tailored message. After each version, they were interviewed about what they (dis)liked about the message. They also ranked the four versions according to preference. Ranks were analyzed with a Friedman's test and a Wilcoxon's signed-rank test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference for message-type preference when the outcome was positive. For the prefrail or frail outcome, message-type preferences differed (χ = 10.51, p = 0.02 and χ = 13.56, p < 0.01, respectively). Overall, for the prefrail and frail outcome, the tailored version was appreciated most. Participants commented that the tailored version made them feel appreciated more as a person. Some found the empathic additions comforting, others found these unnecessary.

CONCLUSIONS

When communicating the results of an online health screening to older adults via the Internet, one should primarily tailor the message toward personal characteristics. The effect of empathic elements in results messages appeared to be limited. Whether a message should be adapted depends on whether the outcome is positive or negative.

摘要

背景

随着在线健康筛查的引入,用于描述如何就个人健康问题进行沟通的指导方针需要适应数字环境。本研究旨在揭示老年人对这些在线信息的偏好。

材料与方法

30 名年龄在 65 至 75 岁的老年人观看了旨在识别虚弱的筛查结果的四个版本的信息:标准信息、共情信息、个性化信息和共情且个性化信息。在观看每个版本后,他们被问及对信息的喜好。他们还根据偏好对四个版本进行了排序。使用 Friedman 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析排名。

结果

对于阳性结果,消息类型偏好没有显著差异。对于虚弱前期或虚弱结果,消息类型偏好存在差异(χ = 10.51,p = 0.02 和 χ = 13.56,p < 0.01,分别)。总体而言,对于虚弱前期和虚弱结果,个性化版本最受欢迎。参与者评论说,个性化版本使他们作为一个人感到更受重视。一些人认为共情元素增加了安慰感,而另一些人则认为这些元素不必要。

结论

当通过互联网向老年人在线传达健康筛查结果时,主要应根据个人特征来调整信息。共情元素在结果信息中的效果似乎有限。消息是否需要适应取决于结果是阳性还是阴性。

相似文献

1
"There Is Something We Need to Tell You…": Communicating Health-Screening Results to Older Adults via the Internet.“有件事我们需要告诉你……”:通过互联网向老年人传达健康筛查结果。
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Sep;23(9):741-746. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0210. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Feasibility and Factor Structure of the FRAIL Scale in Older Adults.衰弱量表在老年人中的可行性和因子结构。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):367.e11-367.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.067. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
Differences in the effect of exercise interventions between prefrail older adults and older adults without frailty: A pilot study.衰弱前期老年人与非衰弱老年人运动干预效果的差异:一项初步研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Sep;17(9):1265-1269. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12853. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
4
Screening for Frailty and Sarcopenia Among Older Persons in Medical Outpatient Clinics and its Associations With Healthcare Burden.在医疗门诊中筛查老年人虚弱和肌少症及其与医疗负担的关系。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):583-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
5
Feasibility of screening for preinjury frailty in hospitalized injured older adults.对住院受伤老年人伤前衰弱进行筛查的可行性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Apr;78(4):844-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000551.
6
Frailty and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Comparison of Different Frailty Measures.衰弱与老年住院患者不良结局风险:不同衰弱测量指标的比较。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):638.e7-638.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
7
The Italian Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Analysis of Psychometric Properties.蒂尔堡衰弱指标的意大利语版本:心理测量特性分析。
Res Aging. 2016 Nov;38(8):842-63. doi: 10.1177/0164027515606192. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
8
Differential association of frailty with cognitive decline and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.社区居住老年人中衰弱与认知功能下降和肌肉减少症的差异关联。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Feb;16(2):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
9
[Screening tools for frailty in ambulatory care].[门诊护理中衰弱的筛查工具]
Adv Gerontol. 2016;29(2):306-312.
10
Cognitive Function in Individuals With Physical Frailty but Without Dementia or Cognitive Complaints: Results From the I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study.身体虚弱但无痴呆或认知主诉个体的认知功能:宜兰纵向衰老研究结果
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Oct 1;16(10):899.e9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
An Embodied Conversational Agent in an eHealth Self-management Intervention for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Heart Failure: Exploratory Study in a Real-life Setting.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病和慢性心力衰竭的电子健康自我管理干预中的具身对话代理:现实环境中的探索性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Nov 4;8(4):e24110. doi: 10.2196/24110.
2
Embodied Conversational Agent Appearance for Health Assessment of Older Adults: Explorative Study.用于老年人健康评估的具身对话代理外观:探索性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Sep 4;7(3):e19987. doi: 10.2196/19987.
3
The use of technology in the context of frailty screening and management interventions: a study of stakeholders' perspectives.
技术在虚弱筛查和管理干预方面的应用:利益相关者观点研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0828-6.
4
Identification of community-dwelling older adults at risk of frailty using the PERSSILAA screening pathway: a methodological guide and results of a large-scale deployment in the Netherlands.使用 PERSSILAA 筛查途径识别社区居住的体弱老年人:方法学指南和在荷兰大规模部署的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 3;19(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6876-0.