Suppr超能文献

青少年运动员每日和每周自我报告训练负荷量度的有效性

Validity of Daily and Weekly Self-Reported Training Load Measures in Adolescent Athletes.

作者信息

Phibbs Padraic J, Roe Gregory, Jones Ben, Read Dale B, Weakley Jonathon, Darrall-Jones Joshua, Till Kevin

机构信息

1Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom; and2Yorkshire Carnegie Rugby Club, Headingley Carnegie Stadium, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):1121-1126. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001708.

Abstract

Phibbs, PJ, Roe, G, Jones, B, Read, DB, Weakley, J, Darrall-Jones, J, and Till, K. Validity of daily and weekly self-reported training load measures in adolescent athletes. J Strength Cond Res 31(4): 1121-1126, 2017-The primary aim of the study was to assess the level of agreement between the criterion session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE30min) and a practical measure of a self-reported Web-based training load questionnaire 24 hours after training (sRPE24h) in adolescent athletes. The secondary aim was to assess the agreement between weekly summated sRPE24h values (∑sRPE24h) and a weekly Web-based training diary (sRPEweekly) for all field-based training accumulated on a subsequent training week. Thirty-six male adolescent rugby players (age, 16.7 ± 0.5 years) were recruited from a regional academy. Measures of sRPE30min were recorded 30 minutes after a typical field-based training session. Participants then completed the sRPE24h via a Web-based training load questionnaire 24 hours after training, reporting both session duration and intensity. In addition, on a subsequent week, participants completed the sRPE24h daily and then completed the sRPEweekly at the end of the week, using the same Web-based platform, to recall all field-based training session durations and intensities over those 7 days. Biases were trivial between sRPE30min and sRPE24h for sRPE (0.3% [-0.9 to 1.5]), with nearly perfect correlations (0.99 [0.98-0.99]) and small typical error of the estimate (TEE; 4.3% [3.6-5.4]). Biases were trivial between ∑sRPE24h and sRPEweekly for sRPE (5.9% [-2.1 to 14.2]), with very large correlations (0.87 [0.78-0.93]) and moderate TEE of 28.5% [23.3-36.9]. The results of this study show that sRPE24h is a valid and robust method to quantify training loads in adolescent athletes. However, sRPEweekly was found to have a substantial TEE (28.5%), limiting practical application.

摘要

菲布斯、PJ、罗伊、G、琼斯、B、里德、DB、威克利、J、达拉尔-琼斯、J和蒂尔、K。青少年运动员每日和每周自我报告训练负荷测量的有效性。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(4):1121 - 1126,2017年——该研究的主要目的是评估青少年运动员在训练24小时后,标准的训练课自觉用力程度评分(sRPE30min)与基于网络的自我报告训练负荷问卷的实际测量值(sRPE24h)之间的一致程度。次要目的是评估在随后训练周累积的所有室外训练中,每周汇总的sRPE24h值(∑sRPE24h)与每周基于网络的训练日记(sRPEweekly)之间的一致性。从一个地区性学院招募了36名男性青少年橄榄球运动员(年龄,16.7±0.5岁)。在一次典型的室外训练课30分钟后记录sRPE30min的测量值。参与者在训练24小时后通过基于网络的训练负荷问卷完成sRPE24h,报告训练课持续时间和强度。此外,在随后的一周,参与者每天完成sRPE24h,然后在周末使用相同的基于网络的平台完成sRPEweekly,以回忆那7天所有室外训练课的持续时间和强度。sRPE30min和sRPE24h之间的偏差对于sRPE来说微不足道(0.3%[-0.9至1.5]),相关性近乎完美(0.99[0.98 - 0.99]),估计的典型误差较小(TEE;4.3%[3.6 - 5.4])。∑sRPE24h和sRPEweekly之间的偏差对于sRPE来说微不足道(5.9%[-2.1至14.2]),相关性非常高(0.87[0.78 - 0.93]),TEE为中等的28.5%[23.3 - 36.9]。该研究结果表明,sRPE24h是量化青少年运动员训练负荷的一种有效且可靠的方法。然而,发现sRPEweekly有相当大的TEE(28.5%),限制了其实际应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验