Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Center, Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Queen Ethelburgas Collegiate, York, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Dec 1;35(12):3400-3406. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003449.
Scantlebury, S, Till, K, Sawczuk, T, Dalton-Barron, N, Phibbs, P, and Jones, B. The frequency and intensity of representative and nonrepresentative late adolescent team-sport athletes' training schedules. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3400-3406, 2021-This study aimed to identify and compare the training frequency and intensity (via session rating of perceived exertion load [sRPE load]) of representative and nonrepresentative late adolescent athletes. Thirty-six team sport athletes completed a web-based questionnaire daily over an 8-month period, reporting their training/match activities from the previous day. Athletes were categorized as representative (academy/county/international) or nonrepresentative (club/school) depending on the highest level of their sport they participated. Mean weekly frequencies and sRPE load of different training/match activities were quantified for each athlete across 5 school terms. Mann-Whitney U tests established the significance of differences and effect sizes between playing standards for mean weekly frequencies and mean sRPE load. Within-athlete weekly sRPE loads were highly variable for both playing standards; however, representative level athletes participated in significantly more activity outside of school compared with nonrepresentative athletes during November-December (effect size; 0.43-club technical training; 0.36-club matches), January-February (effect size; 0.78-club technical training; 0.75-club matches), and February-March (effect size; 0.63-club technical training; 0.44-club matches). Therefore, club and school coaches must ensure that all elements of representative athletes training schedules are coordinated and flexible to promote positive adaptions to training such as skill and physical development and prevent maladaptive responses such as overuse injury and nonfunctional overreaching. A cooperative and malleable training schedule between club/school coaches and the athlete will allow the athlete to perform on multiple fronts while also being able to meet the demands of additional stressors such as schoolwork.
斯坎特伯里、蒂尔、索察克、道尔顿-巴伦、菲布斯和琼斯。代表性和非代表性青少年团队运动员训练计划的频率和强度。J 力量与体能研究 35(12):3400-3406,2021-本研究旨在确定和比较代表性和非代表性青少年运动员的训练频率和强度（通过会话感知努力评分负荷 [sRPE 负荷]）。36 名团队运动运动员在 8 个月的时间内每天完成一份基于网络的问卷，报告前一天的训练/比赛活动。运动员根据他们参加的最高运动水平分为代表性（学院/县/国际）或非代表性（俱乐部/学校）。在 5 个学期内，为每个运动员量化了不同训练/比赛活动的平均每周频率和 sRPE 负荷。曼-惠特尼 U 检验确定了不同比赛标准的平均每周频率和平均 sRPE 负荷之间的差异和效应大小的显著性。对于两个比赛标准，运动员每周的 sRPE 负荷都高度可变；然而，与非代表性运动员相比，代表性水平的运动员在 11 月至 12 月（效应大小；0.43-俱乐部技术训练；0.36-俱乐部比赛）、1 月至 2 月（效应大小；0.78-俱乐部技术训练；0.75-俱乐部比赛）和 2 月至 3 月（效应大小；0.63-俱乐部技术训练；0.44-俱乐部比赛）期间，在校外参加了更多的活动。因此，俱乐部和学校教练必须确保所有代表性运动员训练计划的元素都是协调和灵活的，以促进对训练的积极适应，如技能和身体发展，并防止过度使用损伤和非功能性过度训练等不良适应。俱乐部/学校教练和运动员之间的合作和灵活的训练计划将使运动员能够在多个方面表现出色，同时也能够应对学业等额外压力源的需求。
