• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤室中的机组资源管理:一项前瞻性 3 年队列研究。

Crew Resource Management in the trauma room: a prospective 3-year cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.

Wings of Care, Vught.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):281-287. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000458.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000458
PMID:28328728
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Human factors account for the majority of adverse events. Human factors awareness training entitled Crew Resource Management (CRM) is associated with improved safety and reduced complications and mortality in critically ill patients. We determined the effects of CRM implementation in the trauma room of an Emergency Department (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective 3-year cohort study was carried out in a level 1 ED, admitting more than 12 000 patients annually (>1500 trauma related). At the end of the baseline year, CRM training was performed, followed by an implementation year. The third year was defined as the clinical effect year. The primary outcomes were safety climate, measured using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, and ED length of stay. The secondary outcome measures were hospital length of stay and 48-h crude mortality of trauma patients.

RESULTS

All 5070 trauma patients admitted to the ED during the study period were included. Following CRM implementation, safety climate improved significantly in three out of six Safety Attitudes Questionnaire domains, both at the end of the implementation and clinical effect years: teamwork climate, safety climate, and stress recognition. ED length of stay of these patients increased from 141 (102-192) in the baseline year to 161 (116-211) and 170 (128-223) min in the implementation and clinical effect years, respectively (P<0.05 vs. baseline). Hospital length of stay was prolonged by 1 day in the implementation and clinical effect years (P<0.05 vs. baseline), whereas mortality was unaltered.

CONCLUSION

Although CRM implementation in the ED was associated with an improved safety climate, the time spent by trauma patients in the ED increased.

摘要

目的

人为因素是导致大多数不良事件的主要原因。以机组资源管理(Crew Resource Management,CRM)为主题的人为因素意识培训与危重患者的安全性提高以及并发症和死亡率降低相关。我们旨在确定 CRM 在急诊科创伤室中的实施效果。

患者和方法

这是一项在一级急诊科进行的前瞻性 3 年队列研究,每年收治 12000 多名患者(>1500 例与创伤相关)。在基线年结束时进行 CRM 培训,随后是实施年。第三年被定义为临床效果年。主要结局指标是使用安全态度问卷测量的安全氛围和急诊科住院时间。次要结局指标是医院住院时间和创伤患者 48 小时粗死亡率。

结果

在研究期间,纳入了急诊科收治的所有 5070 例创伤患者。实施 CRM 后,在实施和临床效果年结束时,安全态度问卷的六个安全态度问卷领域中的三个领域的安全氛围明显改善:团队合作氛围、安全氛围和压力识别。这些患者的急诊科住院时间从基线年的 141(102-192)分钟增加到实施年的 161(116-211)分钟和临床效果年的 170(128-223)分钟(与基线相比,P<0.05)。实施年和临床效果年的住院时间延长了 1 天(与基线相比,P<0.05),而死亡率保持不变。

结论

尽管在急诊科实施 CRM 与安全氛围的改善相关,但创伤患者在急诊科的住院时间增加了。

相似文献

1
Crew Resource Management in the trauma room: a prospective 3-year cohort study.创伤室中的机组资源管理:一项前瞻性 3 年队列研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):281-287. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000458.
2
Crew Resource Management in the Intensive Care Unit: a prospective 3-year cohort study.重症监护病房中的医护资源管理:一项为期3年的前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Nov;59(10):1319-29. doi: 10.1111/aas.12573. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
3
"One-way-street" streamlined admission of critically ill trauma patients reduces emergency department length of stay.“单行道”式优化流程对危重症创伤患者的收治可缩短急诊科停留时间。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;12(7):1019-1024. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1511-x. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
4
More explicit communication after classroom-based crew resource management training: results of a pragmatic trial.基于课堂的机组资源管理培训后更明确的沟通:一项实用试验的结果
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;21(1):137-44. doi: 10.1111/jep.12261. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
5
The effect of emergency department delay on outcome in critically ill medical patients: evaluation using hospital mortality and quality of life at 6 months.急诊科延误对危重症内科患者预后的影响:采用6个月时的医院死亡率和生活质量进行评估。
J Intern Med. 2006 Dec;260(6):586-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01716.x.
6
Resuscitation room management of critically ill nontraumatic patients in a German emergency department (OBSERvE-study).德国急诊科危重病非创伤患者复苏室管理(OBSERvE 研究)。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):e9-e17. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000543.
7
Improving staff perception of a safety climate with crew resource management training.通过机组资源管理培训提高员工对安全氛围的认知。
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 1;213:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
8
Trauma team activation criteria in managing trauma patients at an emergency room in Thailand.泰国某急诊室处理创伤患者时的创伤团队启动标准。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Feb;43(1):53-57. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0624-7. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
9
A crew resource management program tailored to trauma resuscitation improves team behavior and communication.一个针对创伤复苏量身定制的机组资源管理计划可改善团队行为和沟通。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Sep;219(3):545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.049. Epub 2014 May 2.
10
Emergency team calls for critically ill non-trauma patients in the emergency department: an observational study.急诊科针对危重症非创伤患者的应急小组呼叫:一项观察性研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 6;23:76. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0159-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The surprising costs of on-site surgical team CRM training: a Dutch example analyzed.现场手术团队危机资源管理培训的惊人成本:以荷兰为例进行分析。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Jul 2;10(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00367-x.
2
Trauma room requirements.创伤室要求。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 18;51(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02820-y.
3
A Novel Approach for More Effective Emergency Equipment Storage: The Task-Based Package-Organized Neonatal Emergency Backpack.一种更有效的应急设备存储新方法:基于任务的包裹式组织新生儿应急背包。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 23;9:771396. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.771396. eCollection 2021.
4
Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade.改善医疗保健领域团队效能的干预措施:过去十年的系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Jan 8;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0411-3.
5
Crew resource management training in healthcare: a systematic review of intervention design, training conditions and evaluation.医疗保健中的机组资源管理培训:干预设计、培训条件和评估的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):e025247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025247.
6
Effect of a cluster randomised team training intervention on adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes: a stepped wedge study.团队培训干预对不良围产儿和产妇结局的影响:一项 stepped wedge 研究。
BJOG. 2019 Jun;126(7):907-914. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15611. Epub 2019 Mar 1.