Lupton-Smith Alison, Argent Andrew, Rimensberger Peter, Frerichs Inez, Morrow Brenda
1Department of Paediatrics, School of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 2Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. 3Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 4Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany. 5University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 May;18(5):e229-e234. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001145.
To determine the effect of prone positioning on ventilation distribution in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Prospective observational study.
Paediatric Intensive Care at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mechanically ventilated children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Electrical impedance tomography measures were taken in the supine position, after which the child was turned into the prone position, and subsequent electrical impedance tomography measurements were taken.
Thoracic electrical impedance tomography measures were taken at baseline and after 5, 20, and 60 minutes in the prone position. The proportion of ventilation, regional filling characteristics, and global inhomogeneity index were calculated for the ventral and dorsal lung regions. Arterial blood gas measurements were taken before and after the intervention. A responder was defined as having an improvement of more than 10% in the oxygenation index after 60 minutes in prone position. Twelve children (nine male, 65%) were studied. Four children were responders, three were nonresponders, and five showed no change to prone positioning. Ventilation in ventral and dorsal lung regions was no different in the supine or prone positions between response groups. The proportion of ventilation in the dorsal lung increased from 49% to 57% in responders, while it became more equal between ventral and dorsal lung regions in the prone position in nonresponders. Responders showed greater improvements in ventilation homogeneity with R improving from 0.86 ± 0.24 to 0.98 ± 0.02 in the ventral lung and 0.91 ± 0.15 to 0.99 ± 0.01 in the dorsal lung region with time in the prone position.
The response to prone position was variable in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Prone positioning improves homogeneity of ventilation and may result in recruitment of the dorsal lung regions.
确定俯卧位对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患儿通气分布的影响。
前瞻性观察研究。
南非开普敦红十字会战争纪念儿童医院儿科重症监护室。
机械通气的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患儿。
在仰卧位进行电阻抗断层扫描测量,之后将患儿转为俯卧位,并进行后续电阻抗断层扫描测量。
在基线时以及俯卧位5分钟、20分钟和60分钟后进行胸部电阻抗断层扫描测量。计算腹侧和背侧肺区域的通气比例、区域充盈特征和整体不均匀性指数。在干预前后进行动脉血气测量。将在俯卧位60分钟后氧合指数改善超过10%的患儿定义为有反应者。研究了12名患儿(9名男性,65%)。4名患儿有反应,3名无反应,5名对俯卧位无变化。在有反应组中,仰卧位和俯卧位时腹侧和背侧肺区域的通气情况无差异。有反应者背侧肺的通气比例从49%增加到57%,而无反应者在俯卧位时腹侧和背侧肺区域之间的通气变得更加均匀。有反应者在通气均匀性方面有更大改善,随着俯卧位时间的延长,腹侧肺的R值从0.86±0.24改善到0.98±0.02,背侧肺区域从0.91±0.15改善到0.99±0.01。
急性呼吸窘迫综合征患儿对俯卧位的反应存在差异。俯卧位可改善通气均匀性,并可能导致背侧肺区域复张。