• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“无问题”问题:对EQ-5D 5L量表天花板效应的实证分析

The "no problems"-problem: an empirical analysis of ceiling effects on the EQ-5D 5L.

作者信息

Konnopka Alexander, Koenig Hans-Helmut

机构信息

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2017 Aug;26(8):2079-2084. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1551-3. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-017-1551-3
PMID:28332022
Abstract

AIM

To analyze the association between ceiling effects on the EQ-5D 5L and morbidity in a general population sample.

METHODS

We used a cross-sectional sample of the German general population (n = 5007) to describe the frequency of health state "11111" and "no problems"-answers on the five single dimensions stratified by the number of diseases for which participants utilized health care during the last 6 months. For the five single dimensions we also used specific criteria to analyze their discriminative ability. A logit-model was applied for a multivariate analysis of ceiling effects.

RESULTS

31% of participants reported the health state "11111." This percentage strongly decreased with increasing morbidity, down to 4.9% if four or more diseases were present. The dimensions "mobility," "usual activities," and "pain/discomfort" showed good discriminative abilities. The dimensions "anxiety/depression" and "self -care" were able to discriminate between different levels of morbidity, but nevertheless showed strong ceiling effects, in particular "self-care."

CONCLUSION

When analyzing ceiling effects of the EQ-5D 5L, one has to draw attention to morbidity since high proportions of participants indicating the best health state might result from being healthy regarding the dimensions assessed by the EQ-5D, in particular in general population datasets.

摘要

目的

分析一般人群样本中EQ-5D 5L量表的天花板效应与发病率之间的关联。

方法

我们采用德国一般人群的横断面样本(n = 5007),按参与者在过去6个月内使用医疗保健服务的疾病数量,对五个单一维度上健康状态“11111”和“无问题”答案的频率进行描述。对于这五个单一维度,我们还使用特定标准分析其区分能力。应用logit模型对天花板效应进行多变量分析。

结果

31%的参与者报告健康状态为“11111”。这一比例随着发病率的增加而大幅下降,若存在四种或更多疾病,该比例降至4.9%。“行动能力”“日常活动”和“疼痛/不适”维度显示出良好的区分能力。“焦虑/抑郁”和“自我护理”维度能够区分不同程度的发病率,但仍表现出强烈的天花板效应,尤其是“自我护理”维度。

结论

在分析EQ-5D 5L量表的天花板效应时,必须关注发病率,因为高比例表明最佳健康状态的参与者可能是由于在EQ-5D评估的维度上健康,特别是在一般人群数据集中。

相似文献

1
The "no problems"-problem: an empirical analysis of ceiling effects on the EQ-5D 5L.“无问题”问题:对EQ-5D 5L量表天花板效应的实证分析
Qual Life Res. 2017 Aug;26(8):2079-2084. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1551-3. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
2
The EQ-5D-5L index score is more discriminative than the EQ-5D-3L index score in diabetes patients.在糖尿病患者中,EQ-5D-5L指数得分比EQ-5D-3L指数得分更具区分性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul;24(7):1767-74. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0902-6. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
3
Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea.韩国普通人群中 EQ-5D-5L 的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):2245-53. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0331-3. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
4
Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-3L in hypertensive patients living in rural China.比较在中国农村生活的高血压患者中 EQ-5D-5L 和 EQ-5D-3L 的测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):2045-2060. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02786-5. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
5
Assessment of the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L instruments in psoriasis.银屑病中EQ-5D-3L和EQ-5D-5L工具的心理测量特性评估。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2017 Jul;309(5):357-370. doi: 10.1007/s00403-017-1743-2. Epub 2017 May 20.
6
Psychometric properties comparison between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in the general Thai population.在泰国普通人群中,EQ-5D-5L 与 EQ-5D-3L 的心理测量学特性比较。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3407-3417. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02595-2. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients.癌症患者中标准EQ - 5D与5级版本的心理测量学比较。
Med Care. 2007 Mar;45(3):259-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254515.63841.81.
8
Psychometric performance assessment of Malay and Malaysian English version of EQ-5D-5L in the Malaysian population.马来西亚人群中马来语和马来西亚英语版 EQ-5D-5L 的心理测量性能评估。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):153-162. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2027-9. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
9
Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in psoriasis patients.在银屑病患者中,EQ-5D-5L与EQ-5D-3L相比的测量属性。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Dec;26(12):3409-3419. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1699-x. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?评估英格兰普通人群的健康状况:EQ-5D的三级版本和五级版本对比情况如何?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 21;13:171. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L composite and component items in the U.S. General population and by age group.EQ-5D-5L综合指标和分项指标在美国普通人群及不同年龄组中的心理测量学表现。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04053-3.
2
Assessing the psychometric properties of generic (EQ-5D-5L) and disease-specific (KCCQ) quality of life in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the AFFECT-HCM study.在AFFECT-HCM研究中评估肥厚型心肌病患者的通用(EQ-5D-5L)和疾病特异性(KCCQ)生活质量的心理测量特性。
Open Heart. 2025 May 27;12(1):e003143. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003143.
3
Exploring the Validity of Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falls and/or Fractures in Exercise Clinical Trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-5D-5L in young Portuguese adults.比较葡萄牙年轻成年人中EQ-5D-3L和EQ-5D-5L的性能。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jun 8;14:89. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0491-x.
2
EQ-5D-5L in the General German Population: Comparison and Evaluation of Three Yearly Cross-Section Surveys.德国普通人群中的EQ-5D-5L:三次年度横断面调查的比较与评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Mar 21;13(3):343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030343.
3
Health care utilisation and costs in the general population in Germany.
在运动临床试验中,探究针对跌倒和/或骨折风险增加的老年人健康相关生活质量测量指标的有效性。
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Feb 26;44(10):7334648251316633. doi: 10.1177/07334648251316633.
4
Trajectory of quality of life among patients with cancer at the end of life: a longitudinal survey study.临终癌症患者的生活质量轨迹:一项纵向调查研究。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03923-0.
5
The Multimorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ1): English translation and validation of a Danish patient reported outcome measure for quality of life in people with multiple long-term conditions in a cross-sectional survey.多重疾病问卷(MMQ1):在一项横断面调查中,对丹麦患者报告的用于评估患有多种长期疾病人群生活质量的结局指标进行英文翻译及验证
Qual Life Res. 2025 May;34(5):1291-1304. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03901-6. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
6
Biopsychosocial factors of quality of life among middle-aged adults living alone in South Korea: a secondary data analysis using the 2017 Korea Community Health Survey.韩国独居中年成年人生活质量的生物心理社会因素:基于2017年韩国社区健康调查的二次数据分析
Arch Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;82(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01342-0.
7
Correlation Analysis of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Japanese Adults with Atopic Dermatitis.日本特应性皮炎成年患者中临床医生报告结局与患者报告结局的相关性分析
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Feb;14(2):533-543. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01094-9. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
Potentially modifiable factors associated with health-related quality of life among people with chronic kidney disease: baseline findings from the National Unified Renal Translational Research Enterprise CKD (NURTuRE-CKD) cohort.慢性肾脏病患者中与健康相关生活质量相关的潜在可改变因素:国家统一肾脏转化研究企业慢性肾脏病(NURTuRE-CKD)队列的基线研究结果
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Jan 19;17(2):sfae010. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae010. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Decomposing income-related inequality in health-related quality of life in mainland China: a national cross-sectional study.分解中国内地健康相关生活质量的收入相关不平等:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov 30;8(11):e013350. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013350.
10
Quality of life and healthcare costs of patients with allergic respiratory diseases: a cross-sectional study.过敏性呼吸道疾病患者的生活质量和医疗保健费用:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jun;25(4):579-600. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01598-3. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
德国普通人群的医疗保健利用情况及费用
Health Policy. 2016 Feb;120(2):159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
4
Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?评估英格兰普通人群的健康状况:EQ-5D的三级版本和五级版本对比情况如何?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 21;13:171. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.
5
Normative values of EQ-5D-5L: in a Spanish representative population sample from Spanish Health Survey, 2011.EQ-5D-5L的规范值:来自2011年西班牙健康调查的西班牙代表性人群样本
Qual Life Res. 2016 May;25(5):1313-21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1164-7. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population.生活质量问卷EQ-5D-5L:德国普通人群的心理测量特性和常模值
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):443-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0498-2. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea.韩国普通人群中 EQ-5D-5L 的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):2245-53. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0331-3. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
8
Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea.比较 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 在韩国癌症患者中的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Aug;21(6):1065-73. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0018-1. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
9
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).新的 EQ-5D 五维版本(EQ-5D-5L)的制定和初步测试。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
10
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.针对健康状况调查问卷的测量属性提出了质量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.