Poór Adrienn Katalin, Rencz Fanni, Brodszky Valentin, Gulácsi László, Beretzky Zsuzsanna, Hidvégi Bernadett, Holló Péter, Kárpáti Sarolta, Péntek Márta
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Semmelweis University, Mária utca 41, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.
Qual Life Res. 2017 Dec;26(12):3409-3419. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1699-x. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
The purpose of this study is to assess the measurement properties of EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in psoriasis patients.
A cross-sectional survey was carried out at an academic dermatology clinic in Hungary. Psoriasis patients completed the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaires, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was assessed. The UK value sets were used to calculate the 3L and 5L index scores. We tested the feasibility, ceiling effect, redistribution properties, the level of inconsistency and informativity (Shannon and Shannon Evenness indices). Spearman's rank-order correlations were performed between EQ-5D, EQ VAS, DLQI and PASI scores. Known-groups validity was evaluated by comparing age groups, clinical subtypes and treatment groups.
Mean age of the 238 patients was 47 years, and 36.6% of them received biological therapy. Mean EQ-5D index score was 0.77 (SD: 0.26) with the 3L and 0.84 (SD: 0.19) with the 5L. The overall ceiling effect decreased from 37.1 (3L) to 32.9% (5L). Shannon index improved significantly for most dimensions, but Shannon Evenness index improved only in three dimensions. Compared to the 3L, the 5L version confirmed a better convergent validity with PASI, but not with the DLQI. Known-groups validity was equally demonstrated both for the 5L and 3L.
The EQ-5D-5L seems to improve measurement properties by reducing ceiling effects, strengthening correlations with PASI and improving informativity. Follow-up studies are needed to test responsiveness and reliability in psoriasis.
本研究的目的是评估与EQ-5D-3L相比,EQ-5D-5L在银屑病患者中的测量属性。
在匈牙利的一家学术皮肤科诊所进行了一项横断面调查。银屑病患者完成了EQ-5D-3L、EQ-5D-5L和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)问卷,并评估了银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)。使用英国价值集计算3L和5L指数得分。我们测试了可行性、天花板效应、再分配属性、不一致水平和信息量(香农和香农均匀度指数)。对EQ-5D、EQ视觉模拟量表(VAS)、DLQI和PASI得分进行了斯皮尔曼等级相关分析。通过比较年龄组、临床亚型和治疗组评估已知组效度。
238例患者的平均年龄为47岁,其中36.6%接受生物治疗。EQ-5D指数平均得分3L为0.77(标准差:0.26),5L为0.84(标准差:0.19)。总体天花板效应从3L的37.1%降至5L的32.9%。大多数维度的香农指数显著改善,但香农均匀度指数仅在三个维度有所改善。与3L相比,5L版本与PASI的收敛效度更好,但与DLQI的收敛效度并非如此。5L和3L均同样显示出已知组效度。
EQ-5D-5L似乎通过降低天花板效应、加强与PASI的相关性和提高信息量来改善测量属性。需要进行后续研究来测试其在银屑病中的反应度和可靠性。