Winterbourn C C, Molloy A L
Department of Pathology, Christchurch School of Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.
Biochem J. 1988 Mar 1;250(2):613-6. doi: 10.1042/bj2500613.
Apolactoferrin and apotransferrin lost their ability to subsequently bind iron when exposed to an excess of either HOCl or myeloperoxidase plus H2O2 and Cl-. Apolactoferrin, however, was more resistant than apotransferrin. By oxidizing a mixture of the two proteins, then separating them by immunoprecipitation, the difference in susceptibility was shown to be due to the greater reactivity of transferrin iron-binding groups, rather than protective groups on the lactoferrin molecule. The iron-saturated proteins were much more resistant to oxidative modification than the apoproteins. The greater resistance of apolactoferrin should be advantageous for maintaining its iron binding capacity when co-released with myeloperoxidase and reactive oxygen species from stimulated neutrophils.
当暴露于过量的次氯酸(HOCl)或髓过氧化物酶加过氧化氢(H₂O₂)和氯离子(Cl⁻)时,脱铁乳铁蛋白和脱铁转铁蛋白随后失去了结合铁的能力。然而,脱铁乳铁蛋白比脱铁转铁蛋白更具抗性。通过氧化这两种蛋白质的混合物,然后通过免疫沉淀将它们分离,结果表明敏感性差异是由于转铁蛋白铁结合基团的反应性更强,而不是乳铁蛋白分子上的保护基团。与脱辅基蛋白相比,铁饱和的蛋白质对氧化修饰的抗性要强得多。当与来自活化中性粒细胞的髓过氧化物酶和活性氧共同释放时,脱铁乳铁蛋白的更强抗性对于维持其铁结合能力应该是有利的。