Maas M, Gröne A, Kuiken T, Van Schaik G, Roest H I J, Van Der Giessen J W B
Rev Sci Tech. 2016 Dec;35(3):863-874. doi: 10.20506/rst.35.3.2575.
The surveillance of (emerging) wildlife diseases can provide important, objective evidence of the circulation of pathogens of interest for veterinary and/or public health. The involvement of multiple research institutions in wildlife disease surveillance can ensure the best use of existing knowledge and expertise, but can also complicate or add challenges to the integration of wildlife disease surveillance components into a national programme. Documenting the existing efforts in a country's surveillance of wildlife diseases, including the institutes in which it takes place, provides a basis for policy-makers and authorities to identify gaps and priorities in their current surveillance programmes. This paper describes the wildlife disease surveillance activities taking place in the Netherlands. The authors recommend that, in addition to funding these current activities, surveillance resources should be allocated with the flexibility to allow for additional targeted surveillance, to detect and adequately respond to newly introduced or emerging pathogens. Similar structured overviews of wildlife disease surveillance in other countries would be very useful to facilitate international collaboration.
对(新出现的)野生动物疾病进行监测可为兽医和/或公共卫生领域关注的病原体传播提供重要的客观证据。多个研究机构参与野生动物疾病监测可确保充分利用现有知识和专业技能,但也可能使将野生动物疾病监测各组成部分纳入国家计划的工作变得复杂或带来挑战。记录一个国家野生动物疾病监测的现有工作,包括开展监测的机构,可为政策制定者和有关当局确定其当前监测计划中的差距和优先事项提供依据。本文描述了荷兰正在开展的野生动物疾病监测活动。作者建议,除了为当前这些活动提供资金外,还应灵活分配监测资源,以便能够进行额外的针对性监测,从而发现新传入或新出现的病原体并做出充分应对。对其他国家的野生动物疾病监测进行类似的结构化概述,将对促进国际合作非常有帮助。