Stephen C, Sleeman J, Nguyen N, Zimmer P, Duff J P, Gavier-Widen D, Grillo T, Lee H, Rijks J, Ryser-Degiorgis M P, Tana T, Uhart M M
Rev Sci Tech. 2018 Dec;37(3):925-936. doi: 10.20506/37.3.2896.
Wildlife health is important for conservation, healthy ecosystems, sustainable development and biosecurity. It presents unique challenges for national programme governance and delivery because wildlife health not only crosses jurisdictional responsibilities and authorities but also inherently spans multiple sectors of expertise. The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) encourages its Members to have wildlife disease monitoring and notification systems. Where national wildlife health surveillance programmes do exist, they vary in scope and size. Evidence-based guidance is lacking on the critical functions and roles needed to meet the OIE's recommendations and other expectations of a national programme. A literature review and consultation with national wildlife health programme leaders identified five key attributes of national programmes: 1) being knowledge and science based; 2) fostering cross-nation equivalence and harmonisation; 3) developing partnerships and national coordination; 4) providing leadership and administration of national efforts; and 5) capacity development. Proposed core purposes include: 1) establishment and communication of the national wildlife health status; 2) leading national planning; 3) centralising information and expertise; 4) developing national networks leading to harmonisation and collaborations; 5) developing wildlife health workforces; and 6) centralising administration and management of national programmes. A national wildlife health programme should aim to identify, effectively communicate and manage the risk to or from a country's wildlife populations. It should generate the appropriate knowledge required to improve the effectiveness of wildlife policies and systems, including identifying and assessing emerging priorities, thus facilitating early warning, preparedness and preventive actions.
野生动物健康对于保护、健康的生态系统、可持续发展和生物安全至关重要。它给国家项目治理和实施带来了独特挑战,因为野生动物健康不仅跨越了管辖权责任和权力,而且本质上涉及多个专业领域。世界动物卫生组织(OIE)鼓励其成员建立野生动物疾病监测和通报系统。在确实存在国家野生动物健康监测项目的地方,其范围和规模各不相同。目前缺乏关于满足OIE建议及国家项目其他预期所需的关键功能和作用的循证指南。一项文献综述以及与国家野生动物健康项目负责人的磋商确定了国家项目的五个关键属性:1)以知识和科学为基础;2)促进跨国等效性和协调统一;3)发展伙伴关系和国家协调;4)为国家行动提供领导和管理;5)能力建设。提议的核心目标包括:1)确定并传达国家野生动物健康状况;2)引领国家规划;3)集中信息和专业知识;4)发展国家网络以实现协调统一与合作;5)培养野生动物健康工作队伍;6)集中国家项目的行政和管理。国家野生动物健康项目应旨在识别、有效沟通并管理对一个国家野生动物种群造成的风险或来自该种群的风险。它应产生提高野生动物政策和系统有效性所需的适当知识,包括识别和评估新出现的优先事项,从而促进早期预警、防范和预防行动。