Marcelino Inês, Keizer Jasmin, Monti Gustavo, Cornelissen Perry, Santman-Berends Inge, Lam Jasper Het, van der Poel Wim H M
Infectious Disease Epidemiology (IDE), Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Department Nature and Society, Staatsbosbeheer, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025 Aug 8;2025:6948049. doi: 10.1155/tbed/6948049. eCollection 2025.
Monitoring and surveillance of pathogens are crucial for safeguarding animal and public health. While passive surveillance is more common for wild and free-living animals, active monitoring improves the detection and characterisation of specific pathogens relevant to animal and public health. In the (OVP) nature reserve in the Netherlands, an active monitoring system for Heck cattle (), Konik horses () and red deer () has been in place since 1997. This study utilised the data generated from the monitoring system to estimate pathogen prevalence and to evaluate the ongoing monitoring efforts. Yearly prevalences were calculated for each observed pathogen, and probability of freedom from infection was assessed for pathogens that were not detected. In cattle, the highest antibody prevalences (>35%-50%) were observed for Bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV-1), Bluetongue virus (BTV), Schmallenberg virus (SBV) and , whereas lower (<25%) prevalences were detected for Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV), , subsp. (), spp. and . Dublin. Similar pathogens were observed in red deer and cattle, but prevalences were generally lower in red deer. In horses, Equine herpesvirus 1 and 4 (EHV-1 and 4), spp., . Dublin and . Typhimurium were detected. Bovine leukaemia virus (BLV), , and serovar Hardjo were not detected in cattle and red deer, nor were Equine infectious anaemia virus (EIAV), Equine influenza virus (EIV) and West Nile virus (WNV) observed in horses. Most of the detected pathogens are endemic in the Netherlands, while non-detected pathogens often have an official disease-free status. This study provides valuable insights into pathogen presence in free-living large herbivores at the OVP nature reserve. The current monitoring system is highly valuable and its effectiveness can be further enhanced through improvements, such as increased sampling efforts and pathogen prioritisation. This knowledge could guide the implementation of similar monitoring strategies in nature reserves across Europe.
对病原体进行监测和监视对于保护动物和公众健康至关重要。虽然被动监测在野生和自由生活的动物中更为常见,但主动监测可改善与动物和公众健康相关的特定病原体的检测和特征描述。自1997年以来,荷兰的(OVP)自然保护区就建立了针对海克牛()、科尼克马()和马鹿()的主动监测系统。本研究利用监测系统生成的数据来估计病原体流行率,并评估正在进行的监测工作。计算了每种观察到的病原体的年度流行率,并对未检测到的病原体评估了无感染概率。在牛中,牛疱疹病毒1型(BoHV-1)、蓝舌病毒(BTV)、施马伦贝格病毒(SBV)和的抗体流行率最高(>35%-50%),而牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)、、亚种()、 spp.和都柏林的流行率较低(<25%)。在马鹿和牛中观察到类似的病原体,但马鹿中的流行率通常较低。在马中,检测到了马疱疹病毒1型和4型(EHV-1和4)、 spp.、都柏林和鼠伤寒。在牛和马鹿中未检测到牛白血病病毒(BLV)、、和血清型哈德乔,在马中也未观察到马传染性贫血病毒(EIAV)、马流感病毒(EIV)和西尼罗河病毒(WNV)。大多数检测到 的病原体在荷兰是地方性的,而未检测到的病原体通常具有官方无病状态。本研究为OVP自然保护区自由生活的大型食草动物中病原体的存在提供了有价值的见解。当前的监测系统非常有价值,通过增加采样力度和病原体优先级排序等改进措施可以进一步提高其有效性。这些知识可为欧洲各地自然保护区实施类似的监测策略提供指导。