Rhee Seung Chul, Bae Hyo-Sang, Lee Yung-Seop, Hwang Rahil
1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dongguk University Medical Center , Goyang, Republic of Korea.
2 Dongguk University Ilsan Oriental Hospital , Goyang, Republic of Korea.
J Altern Complement Med. 2017 May;23(5):370-379. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0325. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
This study aimed to assess the inter-observer concordance rate of anthroscopic examination on facial features among experts in Sasang constitutional medicine (SCM) in order to evaluate the presence of statistical differences in facial structural characteristics among different body types of Sasang constitution (SC), and to develop an objective method for facial analysis for diagnosing SC types to prevent SCM experts from misdiagnosis by their perceptional errors about faces.
This was a double-blinded cross-sectional study conducted on 174 people's faces. Ten SCM experts participated in this study. Frontal and lateral photographs of subjects were standardized and displayed to 10 SCM experts for diagnosing the SC type by anthroscopic examination alone (experiment 1). The subjects' faces were analyzed by photogrammetric method to investigate the presence of any typical structural characteristics of the faces to differentiate SC type (experiment 2). Comparing subjects' SC type with anthroscopic diagnosis by 10 SCM experts, the inter-observer concordance rates were measured (experiment 1). Using photogrammetric facial analysis, a multinomial logistic model was made for analyzing the correlation of SC type and subjects' facial structural configuration (experiment 2).
The inter-observer concordance rate of anthroscopic examination was 2.9% in experiment 1. Using a multinomial logistic fitting model, the predicted probability for determining SC type was 52.8-57.6% in experiment 2 (p < 0.05). Prototype composite faces were also created from photographs of subjects who received the same SC type from the SCM experts.
As SC type cannot be precisely diagnosed using anthroscopic examination alone, SCM needs a definitive objective and scientific diagnosing method to be a scientifically verified alternative medicine and be globalized in future.
本研究旨在评估四象体质医学(SCM)专家对面部特征进行人体视诊检查时的观察者间一致性率,以评估不同四象体质(SC)体型之间面部结构特征是否存在统计学差异,并开发一种客观的面部分析方法来诊断SC类型,以防止SCM专家因对面部的感知误差而误诊。
这是一项对174人的面部进行的双盲横断面研究。10名SCM专家参与了本研究。将受试者的正面和侧面照片标准化后仅向10名SCM专家展示,通过人体视诊检查诊断SC类型(实验1)。通过摄影测量法分析受试者的面部,以研究面部是否存在区分SC类型的典型结构特征(实验2)。将受试者的SC类型与10名SCM专家的人体视诊诊断结果进行比较,测量观察者间一致性率(实验1)。使用摄影测量面部分析,建立多项逻辑模型以分析SC类型与受试者面部结构配置的相关性(实验2)。
实验1中人体视诊检查的观察者间一致性率为2.9%。在实验2中,使用多项逻辑拟合模型确定SC类型的预测概率为52.8 - 57.6%(p < 0.05)。还从SCM专家处获得相同SC类型的受试者照片中创建了原型合成脸。
由于仅使用人体视诊检查无法精确诊断SC类型,SCM需要一种明确的客观科学诊断方法,以便成为一种经过科学验证的替代医学并在未来实现全球化。