• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症休克3.0定义与试验:血管加压素与脓毒症休克试验经验

The Septic Shock 3.0 Definition and Trials: A Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial Experience.

作者信息

Russell James A, Lee Terry, Singer Joel, Boyd John H, Walley Keith R

机构信息

1Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.2Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.3Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Science (CHEOS), St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):940-948. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002323.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002323
PMID:28333757
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Septic Shock 3.0 definition could alter treatment comparisons in randomized controlled trials in septic shock. Our first hypothesis was that the vasopressin versus norepinephrine comparison and 28-day mortality of patients with Septic Shock 3.0 definition (lactate > 2 mmol/L) differ from vasopressin versus norepinephrine and mortality in Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial. Our second hypothesis was that there are differences in plasma cytokine levels in Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial for lactate less than or equal to 2 versus greater than 2 mmol/L.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Multicenter ICUs.

METHODS

We compared vasopressin-to-norepinephrine group 28- and 90-day mortality in Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial in lactate subgroups. We measured 39 cytokines to compare patients with lactate less than or equal to 2 versus greater than 2 mmol/L.

PATIENTS

Patients with septic shock with lactate greater than 2 mmol/L or less than or equal to 2 mmol/L, randomized to vasopressin or norepinephrine.

INTERVENTIONS

Concealed vasopressin (0.03 U/min.) or norepinephrine infusions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The Septic Shock 3.0 definition would have decreased sample size by about half. The 28- and 90-day mortality rates were 10-12 % higher than the original Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial mortality. There was a significantly (p = 0.028) lower mortality with vasopressin versus norepinephrine in lactate less than or equal to 2 mmol/L but no difference between treatment groups in lactate greater than 2 mmol/L. Nearly all cytokine levels were significantly higher in patients with lactate greater than 2 versus less than or equal to 2 mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

The Septic Shock 3.0 definition decreased sample size by half and increased 28-day mortality rates by about 10%. Vasopressin lowered mortality versus norepinephrine if lactate was less than or equal to 2 mmol/L. Patients had higher plasma cytokines in lactate greater than 2 versus less than or equal to 2 mmol/L, a brisker cytokine response to infection. The Septic Shock 3.0 definition and our findings have important implications for trial design in septic shock.

摘要

目的

脓毒症休克3.0定义可能会改变脓毒症休克随机对照试验中的治疗比较。我们的第一个假设是,血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素的比较以及符合脓毒症休克3.0定义(乳酸>2 mmol/L)的患者的28天死亡率与血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素的比较以及血管加压素与脓毒症休克试验中的死亡率不同。我们的第二个假设是,在血管加压素与脓毒症休克试验中,乳酸小于或等于2 mmol/L与大于2 mmol/L的患者血浆细胞因子水平存在差异。

设计

对随机对照试验的回顾性分析。

地点

多中心重症监护病房。

方法

我们比较了血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素组在血管加压素与脓毒症休克试验中乳酸亚组的28天和90天死亡率。我们测量了39种细胞因子,以比较乳酸小于或等于2 mmol/L与大于2 mmol/L的患者。

患者

乳酸大于2 mmol/L或小于或等于2 mmol/L的脓毒症休克患者,随机分为血管加压素组或去甲肾上腺素组。

干预措施

采用盲法输注血管加压素(0.03 U/分钟)或去甲肾上腺素。

测量指标及主要结果

脓毒症休克3.0定义会使样本量减少约一半。28天和90天死亡率比最初的血管加压素与脓毒症休克试验死亡率高10%-12%。在乳酸小于或等于2 mmol/L的患者中,血管加压素组的死亡率显著低于去甲肾上腺素组(p = 0.028),但在乳酸大于2 mmol/L的患者中,治疗组之间没有差异。乳酸大于2 mmol/L的患者几乎所有细胞因子水平均显著高于乳酸小于或等于2 mmol/L的患者。

结论

脓毒症休克3.0定义使样本量减少一半,并使28天死亡率增加约10%。如果乳酸小于或等于2 mmol/L,血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素相比可降低死亡率。乳酸大于2 mmol/L的患者血浆细胞因子水平高于乳酸小于或等于2 mmol/L的患者,对感染的细胞因子反应更强烈。脓毒症休克3.0定义及我们的研究结果对脓毒症休克的试验设计具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
The Septic Shock 3.0 Definition and Trials: A Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial Experience.脓毒症休克3.0定义与试验:血管加压素与脓毒症休克试验经验
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):940-948. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002323.
2
Vasopressin compared with norepinephrine augments the decline of plasma cytokine levels in septic shock.与去甲肾上腺素相比,加压素可增强脓毒性休克患者血浆细胞因子水平的下降。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug 1;188(3):356-64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201302-0355OC.
3
Normal-range blood lactate concentration in septic shock is prognostic and predictive.脓毒性休克时正常范围的血乳酸浓度具有预后和预测价值。
Shock. 2012 Jul;38(1):4-10. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318254d41a.
4
Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.脓毒性休克患者中血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素输注的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373.
5
Fixed-dose vasopressin compared with titrated dopamine and norepinephrine as initial vasopressor therapy for septic shock.与滴定剂量的多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素相比,固定剂量血管加压素作为脓毒性休克初始血管升压药治疗的疗效比较
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Aug;24(8):1002-12. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.11.1002.36139.
6
Addition of vasopressin to norepinephrine as independent predictor of mortality in patients with refractory septic shock: an observational study.在难治性感染性休克患者中,血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素作为死亡率的独立预测因素:一项观察性研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007 Apr;8(2):189-200. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.003.
7
Association of Catecholamine Dose, Lactate, and Shock Duration at Vasopressin Initiation With Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock.脓毒性休克患者开始使用血管加压素时儿茶酚胺剂量、乳酸水平和休克持续时间与死亡率的关联
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):614-623. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005317.
8
Bench-to-bedside review: Vasopressin in the management of septic shock.从临床前到临床:血管加压素在脓毒性休克治疗中的应用。
Crit Care. 2011 Aug 11;15(4):226. doi: 10.1186/cc8224.
9
Effect of Early Vasopressin vs Norepinephrine on Kidney Failure in Patients With Septic Shock: The VANISH Randomized Clinical Trial.血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克患者肾衰竭影响的随机临床试验:VANISH 研究。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):509-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10485.
10
Mortality, Morbidity, and Costs After Implementation of a Vasopressin Guideline in Medical Intensive Care Patients With Septic Shock: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.在脓毒性休克的重症监护患者中实施血管加压素指南后的死亡率、发病率和成本:一项中断时间序列分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Apr;54(4):314-321. doi: 10.1177/1060028019886306. Epub 2019 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Vasopressin and its analogues in patients with septic shock: holy Grail or unfulfilled promise?血管加压素及其类似物在感染性休克患者中的应用:圣杯还是未兑现的承诺?
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 29;29(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05540-2.
2
Hemodynamic effects of adjunct arginine vasopressin to norepinephrine in septic shock: insights from a prospective multicenter registry study.脓毒性休克中精氨酸血管加压素辅助去甲肾上腺素的血流动力学效应:一项前瞻性多中心注册研究的见解
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01472-w.
3
[Vasoactive agents in septic shock-individualized strategies].
[脓毒性休克中的血管活性药物——个体化策略]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01272-x.
4
Whole blood thiamine, intravenous thiamine supplementation and delirium occurrence in the intensive care unit: retrospective cohort analyses.全血硫胺素、静脉补充硫胺素与重症监护病房谵妄的发生:回顾性队列分析
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Jun;46(3):631-638. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01690-x. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
5
Protocol for fever control using external cooling in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: SEPSISCOOL II randomised controlled trial.使用外部冷却控制机械通气合并感染性休克患者发热的方案:SEPSISCOOL II 随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):e069430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069430.
6
Perceptions regarding vasopressin use and practices in septic shock, and cost containment strategies.关于脓毒性休克中血管加压素使用和实践的认知以及成本控制策略。
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2019 Jun;2(3):257-267. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1079. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Vasopressin in Sepsis and Other Shock States: State of the Art.血管加压素在脓毒症及其他休克状态中的应用:最新进展
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 29;13(11):1548. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111548.
8
Alternatives to norepinephrine in septic shock: Which agents and when?感染性休克中去甲肾上腺素的替代药物:哪些药物以及何时使用?
J Intensive Med. 2022 Jun 12;2(4):223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.05.001. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Sub-therapeutic vasopressin but not therapeutic vasopressin improves gastrointestinal microcirculation in septic rats: A randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded trial.亚治疗剂量的血管加压素而非治疗剂量的血管加压素可改善脓毒症大鼠的胃肠微循环:一项随机、安慰剂对照、盲法试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0257034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257034. eCollection 2021.
10
Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling of the Correlation Between Prognosis Differences and PD-1 Expression in Sepsis: A Preliminary Study.脓毒症中预后差异与 PD-1 表达相关性的非靶向代谢组学分析:一项初步研究。
Front Immunol. 2021 Apr 1;12:594270. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.594270. eCollection 2021.