• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒性休克中精氨酸血管加压素辅助去甲肾上腺素的血流动力学效应:一项前瞻性多中心注册研究的见解

Hemodynamic effects of adjunct arginine vasopressin to norepinephrine in septic shock: insights from a prospective multicenter registry study.

作者信息

Melchers Max, de Smet Vivienne, Rooijakkers Chrissie, Huising Jonathan, Vermeulen Wander, Köktaş Beyza Nur Nisa, van de Vusse Karlijn Johanna, Sabzewar Kimia Milani, Mishra Shakti Bedanta, Bethlehem Carina, Boer Dirk P, Cimic Nedim, van Duijnhoven Mirella, Frenzel Tim, Liesveld Jordi, Paternoster Gianluca, Stads Susanne, Weenink Jan J, Festen-Spanjer Barbara, Pickkers Peter, van Zanten Arthur Raymond Hubert

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands.

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01472-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13613-025-01472-w
PMID:40299108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12040798/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines suggest adding arginine vasopressin (AVP) when norepinephrine (NE) doses reach 0.25-0.50 µg/kg/min in septic shock patients. However, relying solely on a NE threshold has limitations, as other factors may be valuable in guiding AVP therapy during septic shock. Therefore, we aimed to identify additional patient characteristics associated with AVP hemodynamic responsiveness.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted among adult ICU patients who met the predefined criteria for septic shock (not reaching the individual target mean arterial pressure despite adequate fluid resuscitation and NE base dose > 0.25 µg/kg/min) and received AVP therapy. AVP hemodynamic responsiveness was the primary study outcome, defined as stabilization or decrease of NE infusion rate two hours after initiating AVP. Secondary outcomes included shock duration and rebound hypotension following termination of AVP infusion. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to detect associations between characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

Between May 2020 and October 2023, 200 septic shock patients originating from 11 different ICUs were included. Of these, 153 (79%) met the definition for AVP hemodynamic responsiveness. Obesity and hyperlactatemia was negatively associated with AVP-response (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 0.30, 95%CI 0.14-0.65 and aOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.75-0.99, respectively), while a NE infusion rate ≥ 0.30 µg/kg/min showed positive odds of AVP response (aOR 2.33, 95%CI 1.06-5.14). Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation was lower in AVP responders than non-responders (4% vs. 14%, p = 0.013). Higher body mass index (BMI) , NE infusion rate and duration prior to AVP initiation was associated with longer shock duration (aOR 1.06, 95%CI 1.02-1.11, aOR 1.12, 95%CI 1.01-1.25, and 1.01 95% CI 1.00-1.03, respectively), while higher pH associated with lower likelihood of prolonged shock (aOR 0.80, 95%CI 0.64-0.99). Rebound hypotension occurred in 9% when AVP was terminated, and AVP duration > 24 h was negatively associated with rebound hypotension (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.05-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial lactate, pH, BMI, and NE duration and dose were associated with AVP responsiveness and shock duration during septic shock, and rebound hypotension occurred in 9% during recovery. Our findings suggest that beyond NE thresholds, specific factors could be considered to optimize adjunctive AVP therapy in septic shock patients.

摘要

背景

拯救脓毒症运动指南建议,对于脓毒性休克患者,当去甲肾上腺素(NE)剂量达到0.25 - 0.50微克/千克/分钟时,加用精氨酸加压素(AVP)。然而,单纯依赖NE阈值存在局限性,因为在脓毒性休克期间,其他因素可能对指导AVP治疗有价值。因此,我们旨在确定与AVP血流动力学反应相关的其他患者特征。

方法

对符合脓毒性休克预定义标准(尽管进行了充分的液体复苏且NE基础剂量>0.25微克/千克/分钟,但未达到个体目标平均动脉压)并接受AVP治疗的成年ICU患者进行了一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。AVP血流动力学反应是主要研究结局,定义为开始使用AVP两小时后NE输注速率稳定或降低。次要结局包括休克持续时间和停止AVP输注后的反弹性低血压。进行单变量和多变量回归分析以检测特征与结局之间的关联。

结果

在2020年5月至2023年10月期间,纳入了来自11个不同ICU的200例脓毒性休克患者。其中,153例(79%)符合AVP血流动力学反应的定义。肥胖和高乳酸血症与AVP反应呈负相关(调整后的优势比[aOR]分别为0.30,95%置信区间0.14 - 0.65和aOR 0.86,95%置信区间0.75 - 0.99),而NE输注速率≥0.30微克/千克/分钟显示出AVP反应的正优势(aOR 2.33,95%置信区间1.06 - 5.14)。AVP反应者中新发房颤的发生率低于无反应者(4%对14%,p = 0.013)。较高的体重指数(BMI)、NE输注速率和开始使用AVP前的持续时间与较长的休克持续时间相关(aOR分别为1.06,95%置信区间1.02 - 1.11;aOR 1.12,95%置信区间1.01 - 1.25;以及1.01,95%置信区间1.00 - 1.03),而较高的pH值与休克延长的可能性较低相关(aOR 0.80,95%置信区间0.64 - 0.99)。停止AVP时,9%的患者发生反弹性低血压,AVP持续时间>24小时与反弹性低血压呈负相关(优势比0.22,95%置信区间0.05 - 0.85)。

结论

动脉血乳酸、pH值、BMI以及NE持续时间和剂量与脓毒性休克期间的AVP反应性和休克持续时间相关,恢复期间9%的患者发生反弹性低血压。我们的研究结果表明,除了NE阈值外,还可以考虑特定因素来优化脓毒性休克患者的辅助AVP治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1850/12040798/e2d077ba5fc8/13613_2025_1472_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1850/12040798/74bca95f02f1/13613_2025_1472_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1850/12040798/e2d077ba5fc8/13613_2025_1472_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1850/12040798/74bca95f02f1/13613_2025_1472_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1850/12040798/e2d077ba5fc8/13613_2025_1472_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hemodynamic effects of adjunct arginine vasopressin to norepinephrine in septic shock: insights from a prospective multicenter registry study.脓毒性休克中精氨酸血管加压素辅助去甲肾上腺素的血流动力学效应:一项前瞻性多中心注册研究的见解
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01472-w.
2
Influence of Timing and Catecholamine Requirements on Vasopressin Responsiveness in Critically ill Patients with Septic Shock.危重症脓毒性休克患者血管加压素反应性的时机和儿茶酚胺需求的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;37(11):1512-1519. doi: 10.1177/08850666221081836. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
3
Hypotension Risk Based on Vasoactive Agent Discontinuation Order in Patients in the Recovery Phase of Septic Shock.基于血管活性药物停用医嘱的脓毒性休克复苏期患者低血压风险
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Mar;38(3):319-326. doi: 10.1002/phar.2082. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Effect of early vasopressin combined with norepinephrine on short-term mortality in septic shock: A retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性研究:早期血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素对脓毒性休克短期死亡率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;69:188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.040. Epub 2023 May 3.
5
Hemodynamic Response to Vasopressin Dosage of 0.03 Units/Min vs. 0.04 Units/Min in Patients With Septic Shock.血管加压素剂量为 0.03 单位/分钟与 0.04 单位/分钟对感染性休克患者血流动力学反应的比较。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):92-99. doi: 10.1177/0885066620977181. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
6
Incidence of hypotension according to the discontinuation order of vasopressors in the management of septic shock: a prospective randomized trial (DOVSS).根据血管加压素停药顺序管理感染性休克时低血压的发生率:一项前瞻性随机试验(DOVSS)。
Crit Care. 2018 May 21;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2034-9.
7
A small dose of arginine vasopressin in combination with norepinephrine is a good early treatment for uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after hemostasis.止血后未控制的出血性休克早期,小剂量血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素治疗效果良好。
J Surg Res. 2011 Jul;169(1):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
8
Timing of vasopressin initiation and mortality in patients with septic shock: analysis of the MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV databases.血管加压素起始时机与感染性休克患者死亡率的关系:对 MIMIC-III 和 MIMIC-IV 数据库的分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08147-6.
9
Incidence of Hypotension after Discontinuation of Norepinephrine or Arginine Vasopressin in Patients with Septic Shock: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.去甲肾上腺素或精氨酸血管加压素停药后脓毒性休克患者低血压的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jan 6;35(1):e8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e8.
10
Efficacy and Outcomes After Vasopressin Guideline Implementation in Septic Shock.血管加压素指南在感染性休克中的实施效果及结果
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Jan;51(1):13-20. doi: 10.1177/1060028016669163. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Vasopressin and its analogues in patients with septic shock: holy Grail or unfulfilled promise?血管加压素及其类似物在感染性休克患者中的应用:圣杯还是未兑现的承诺?
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 29;29(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05540-2.
2
Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Catecholamine-Refractory Shock: A Narrative Review.对儿茶酚胺难治性休克病理生理学的见解:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Jun 17;17(6):e86224. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86224. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Point of View: A Holistic Four-Interface Conceptual Model for Personalizing Shock Resuscitation.

本文引用的文献

1
Corticosteroids in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review, Pairwise, and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的皮质类固醇:一项系统评价、成对及剂量反应荟萃分析
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jan 19;6(1):e1000. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001000. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Position Paper on the Reporting of Norepinephrine Formulations in Critical Care from the Society of Critical Care Medicine and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Joint Task Force.关于重症监护中去甲肾上腺素制剂报告的立场文件:来自重症监护医学学会和欧洲危重病医学学会联合工作组。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 1;52(4):521-530. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006176. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
观点:用于个性化休克复苏的整体四界面概念模型
J Pers Med. 2025 May 20;15(5):207. doi: 10.3390/jpm15050207.
Vasopressin in Sepsis and Other Shock States: State of the Art.
血管加压素在脓毒症及其他休克状态中的应用:最新进展
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 29;13(11):1548. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111548.
4
asopressin nitiation as a econd-Line Vasoressor in Early eptic hock (VISPSS).作为早期感染性休克(VISPSS)二线血管加压药物的血管加压素起始治疗。
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Apr;39(4):306-312. doi: 10.1177/08850666231201364. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
5
Rethinking Vasopressin: New Insights into Vasopressin Signaling and Its Implications.重新思考血管加压素:血管加压素信号转导及其意义的新见解。
Kidney360. 2023 Aug 1;4(8):1174-1180. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000194. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Response to: norepinephrine formulation for equivalent vasopressive score.对:等效血管升压评分的去甲肾上腺素制剂的反应。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 28;27(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04404-x.
7
Refractory septic shock and alternative wordings: A systematic review of literature.难治性脓毒性休克及其他表述:文献系统综述
J Crit Care. 2023 Jun;75:154258. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154258. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
8
An updated "norepinephrine equivalent" score in intensive care as a marker of shock severity.在重症监护中,更新的“去甲肾上腺素等效评分”作为休克严重程度的标志物。
Crit Care. 2023 Jan 20;27(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04322-y.
9
Timing of Vasopressin Addition to Norepinephrine and Efficacy Outcomes in Patients With Septic Shock.血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素治疗脓毒性休克患者的时机与疗效结局。
Ann Pharmacother. 2023 May;57(5):521-526. doi: 10.1177/10600280221118903. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
10
When to start vasopressin in septic shock: the strategy we propose.脓毒性休克时何时开始使用血管加压素:我们提出的策略。
Crit Care. 2022 May 6;26(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04001-4.