Park Ji-Hye, Yoo Chungkwon, Park Jinhwan, Kim Yong Yeon
Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Glaucoma. 2017 Jun;26(6):541-547. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000667.
To investigate the clinical features of young Korean patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), and to compare visual field (VF) defects between patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and those with high-tension glaucoma (HTG).
Patients with OAG younger than 40 years of age were divided into NTG and HTG groups based on untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) level. The patients were matched according to the mean deviation of standard automated perimetry. VFs were divided into 2 pairs of corresponding areas across the horizontal meridian, and the depths of VF defects were compared. Tilt ratio and torsion degree of their optic discs were also compared between the 2 groups.
Thirty-four pairs of NTG and HTG eyes were matched. Although untreated IOP showed intergroup differences, there was no difference in age, refractive error, tilt ratio, torsion degree, and depth of VF defects between the 2 groups. However, NTG eyes showed deeper VF defects in the superior paracentral area than in the inferior paracentral area (-8.29±9.33 vs. -4.45±6.03 dB, P=0.038), whereas the HTG eyes showed symmetric VF defects. Moreover, the superior paracentral area showed deeper VF defects compared with the superior arcuate area in the NTG group (P=0.002).
Young patients with NTG showed asymmetric VF defects in the paracentral area, whereas those with HTG did not show such asymmetric defects. This suggests that the level of IOP may affect the pattern of VF defects in young patients with OAG. However, these findings may not be generalizable to other populations.
研究韩国年轻开角型青光眼(OAG)患者的临床特征,并比较正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)患者和高眼压性青光眼(HTG)患者的视野(VF)缺损情况。
将40岁以下的OAG患者根据未治疗时的眼压(IOP)水平分为NTG组和HTG组。根据标准自动视野计的平均偏差对患者进行匹配。视野分为水平子午线两侧的2对相应区域,比较视野缺损的深度。同时比较两组患者视盘的倾斜率和扭转度。
匹配了34对NTG和HTG患眼。尽管未治疗时的眼压显示出组间差异,但两组在年龄、屈光不正、倾斜率、扭转度和视野缺损深度方面没有差异。然而,NTG患眼在上方旁中心区域的视野缺损比下方旁中心区域更深(-8.29±9.33 vs. -4.45±6.03 dB,P = 0.038),而HTG患眼的视野缺损呈对称分布。此外,NTG组上方旁中心区域的视野缺损比上方弓形区域更深(P = 0.002)。
年轻的NTG患者在旁中心区域表现出不对称的视野缺损,而HTG患者则未表现出这种不对称缺损。这表明眼压水平可能会影响年轻OAG患者的视野缺损模式。然而,这些发现可能不适用于其他人群。