Suppr超能文献

原发性闭角型青光眼、高眼压型青光眼和正常眼压型青光眼视野缺损模式的比较。

The Patterns of Visual Field Defects in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Compared to High-Tension Glaucoma and Normal-Tension Glaucoma.

机构信息

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Res. 2023;66(1):940-948. doi: 10.1159/000530175. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the patterns of visual field (VF) defects in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) to control groups of eyes with high-tension glaucoma (HTG) and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

METHODS

Forty-eight eyes with PACG were enrolled, and control eyes with HTG and NTG matched for age, sex, and mean deviation of VF defect were selected. VF tests were performed using the 24-2 program of the Humphrey field analyzer. VF defects were classified into six patterns with the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study classification system and were categorized into three stages (early, moderate, and advanced). Each hemifield was divided into five regions according to the Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT). The mean total deviation (TD) of each GHT region was calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with HTG and NTG groups, the partial arcuate VF defects were more common in the PACG group. In the PACG group, the nasal GHT region in the inferior hemifield had the worst mean TD (-8.48 ± 8.62 dB), followed by the arcuate 1 (-7.81 ± 7.91 dB), arcuate 2 (-7.46 ± 7.43 dB), paracentral (-7.19 ± 7.98 dB), and central (-5.14 ± 6.24 dB) regions; the mean TD of the central region was significantly better than those for all other regions (all p < 0.05). A similar trend was observed in the superior hemifield in the PACG group but not the VF hemifields of the HTG and NTG groups.

CONCLUSION

Patterns of VF defect in PACG patients differ from those with HTG and NTG. This discrepancy might be due to the differences in the pathogenic mechanisms of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

摘要

介绍

本研究旨在比较原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)患者的视野(VF)缺损模式与高眼压青光眼(HTG)和正常眼压青光眼(NTG)对照组的差异。

方法

纳入 48 只 PACG 眼,并选择年龄、性别和 VF 缺损平均偏差相匹配的 HTG 和 NTG 对照眼。使用 Humphrey 视野分析仪的 24-2 程序进行 VF 测试。VF 缺损根据眼高压治疗研究(Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study)分类系统分为六类,并分为三个阶段(早期、中期和晚期)。根据青光眼半视野测试(Glaucoma Hemifield Test,GHT),将每个半视野分为五个区域。计算每个 GHT 区域的平均总偏差(TD)。

结果

与 HTG 和 NTG 组相比,PACG 组更常见部分弓形 VF 缺损。在 PACG 组中,下象限的鼻侧 GHT 区域的平均 TD 最差(-8.48 ± 8.62dB),其次是弓形 1 区(-7.81 ± 7.91dB)、弓形 2 区(-7.46 ± 7.43dB)、旁中心区(-7.19 ± 7.98dB)和中心区(-5.14 ± 6.24dB);中心区的平均 TD 明显优于其他所有区域(均 p < 0.05)。在 PACG 组的上半视野中观察到类似的趋势,但在 HTG 和 NTG 组的 VF 半视野中没有观察到这种趋势。

结论

PACG 患者的 VF 缺损模式与 HTG 和 NTG 患者不同。这种差异可能是由于青光眼性视神经病变的发病机制不同所致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验