Suppr超能文献

单颗种植体的美学及以患者为中心的疗效:一项回顾性研究。

Esthetic and Patient-Centered Outcomes of Single Implants: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Gjelvold Björn, Chrcanovic Bruno Ramos, Bagewitz Ingrid Collin, Kisch Jenö, Albrektsson Tomas, Wennerberg Ann

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 September/October;32(5):1065–1073. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5495. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this clinical study were to retrospectively evaluate implant survival, patient satisfaction, and radiographic, clinical, and esthetic outcomes following single-implant treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients, with a total of 126 implants (XiVE S, Dentsply Implants), who received single implant-retained crowns between 2004 and 2011 were retrospectively evaluated. Implant survival, marginal bone levels (MBL), changes in implant/mesial tooth vertical relationship, pink esthetic score (PES), white esthetic score (WES), patient assessment of the esthetics (visual analog scale), and oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Altogether, 59 patients with a total of 85 implants attended a final clinical and radiographic follow-up examination. The mean ages of males and females at implant placement were 19.78 and 22.58 years, respectively. The mean total follow-up time from the implant surgical date was 7.51 years. The 5-year implant clinical survival rate (CSR) was 98.4% (95% CI: 96.3%-100%), and crown CSR was 91.8% (95% CI: 86.3%-97.3%). The overall mean change in MBL was -0.19 mm. No significant differences were found between the different implant diameters (3.0, 3.4, and 3.8 mm) with regard to change in MBL. Mean increase in implant infraposition was 0.13 mm. With regard to esthetics, mean initial and final total PES were 9.61 and 11.49, respectively (P < .001). The mean WES was 6.48 at follow-up. Patients' mean assessment of soft tissue esthetics and implant-supported crown appearance were 73.5 and 82.1 (maximum score 100). At the follow-up examination, the additive OHIP-14 score was 16.11.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of XiVE S implants found excellent survival rates and showed good clinical outcomes concerning patient-centered findings, esthetics, and marginal bone preservation. In context, it is important to stress that this study consisted of mostly young patients with agenesis who were treated by experienced clinicians.

摘要

目的

本临床研究旨在回顾性评估单颗种植体治疗后的种植体存留率、患者满意度以及影像学、临床和美学效果。

材料与方法

对2004年至2011年间接受单颗种植体支持冠修复的87例患者(共126颗种植体,XiVE S,登士柏种植体公司)进行回顾性评估。评估种植体存留率、边缘骨水平(MBL)、种植体/近中牙垂直关系变化、粉色美学评分(PES)、白色美学评分(WES)、患者美学评估(视觉模拟量表)以及口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP-14)。

结果

共有59例患者(共85颗种植体)接受了最终的临床和影像学随访检查。种植体植入时男性和女性的平均年龄分别为19.78岁和22.58岁。从种植体手术日期开始计算的平均总随访时间为7.51年。种植体5年临床存留率(CSR)为98.4%(95%可信区间:96.3%-100%),牙冠CSR为91.8%(95%可信区间:86.3%-97.3%)。MBL的总体平均变化为-0.19 mm。不同种植体直径(3.0、3.4和3.8 mm)在MBL变化方面未发现显著差异。种植体下沉的平均增加量为0.13 mm。在美学方面,初始和最终的平均总PES分别为9.61和11.49(P <.001)。随访时平均WES为6.48。患者对软组织美学和种植体支持冠外观的平均评估分别为73.5和82.1(满分100)。在随访检查中,OHIP-14的累加评分为16.11。

结论

这项对XiVE S种植体的回顾性研究发现其存留率极佳,并且在以患者为中心的研究结果、美学和边缘骨保存方面显示出良好的临床效果。在此背景下,需要强调的是,本研究主要纳入的是由经验丰富的临床医生治疗的患有牙发育不全的年轻患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验