Wallin Bengtsson Viveca, Lindahl Christel, Scholander Sven
Department of Oral Health, Faculty of Oral Health Science, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Private Practice, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 Jan 21;84:47-53. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.42724.
Little attention has been paid to patients' perception of function and esthetics with single dental implants. The aim of this study was therefore to describe patient-reported function and esthetic outcomes in single dental implants. A second aim was to study the objective esthetics in single dental implants.
Patients with one single dental implant in the esthetic zone were selected. Two questionnaires with visual analog scales (VAS) were filled in by the patients, and intraoral photographs were taken. One of the questionnaires related to satisfaction with cleaning and function, and the other involved the esthetics of the single dental implant. One dentist reviewed the photographs using the pink esthetic score/white esthetic score (PES/WES) index. Results: For chewing and for speaking, the scores were 8.8 and 9.9 respectively on a VAS (best 10). The overall esthetic score on a VAS was 8.6 (best 10). The PES/WES in the present study was 14.6 (standard deviation [SD] ± 1.9), and 3/45 (6.7%) of the single dental implants never reached clinical acceptability. Conclusions: Patients reported high satisfaction with both the function and the esthetics of single dental implants. Both subjectively and objectively, the peri-implant mucosa was less favorable compared with the crown.
对于单颗牙种植患者对功能和美观的感知关注较少。因此，本研究的目的是描述患者报告的单颗牙种植的功能和美观结果。第二个目的是研究单颗牙种植的客观美观情况。
选择在美学区域植入单颗牙种植体的患者。患者填写两份带有视觉模拟量表（VAS）的问卷，并拍摄口内照片。其中一份问卷涉及对清洁和功能的满意度，另一份涉及单颗牙种植体的美观情况。一名牙医使用粉色美学评分/白色美学评分（PES/WES）指数评估照片。结果：在VAS上，咀嚼和说话的评分分别为8.8和9.9（满分10分）。VAS上的总体美观评分为8.6（满分10分）。本研究中的PES/WES为14.6（标准差[SD]±1.9），45颗单颗牙种植体中有3颗（6.7%）从未达到临床可接受性。结论：患者对单颗牙种植体的功能和美观都报告了较高的满意度。主观和客观上，种植体周围黏膜与牙冠相比都不太理想。
