Private Practice, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01381-3.
Implant survival and implant success (freedom of biologic complications) are important factors in assessing the success of implant therapy. However, these factors are not the only determinants. Patients' satisfaction also plays a very important role in daily practice. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction regarding function (phonetics, chewing comfort, stability, cleanability) and aesthetics in patients treated with XiVE and Frialite implants in a private periodontal practice ten years after implant placement. Furthermore, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was evaluated.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) regarding overall satisfaction, phonetics, chewing comfort, stability, cleanability, and aesthetics were examined on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 10 years ± 6 months after implant placement in a cross-sectional survey. OHRQoL and psychological impact were assessed via the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ). Potential influence of patient-related factors (age, gender, smoking, peri-implantitis, implant position, type of restoration) on VAS, OHRQoL and PIDAQ were investigated using regression analyses.
High satisfaction with implant-supported restorations was seen in all 95 patients ten years after implant placement. Mean VAS-score for general satisfaction with implant-supported restoration was 93.0% (SD ± 9.4, median: 96.3%, range 50.0-100%). Mean OHIP score was 11.3 (SD ± 10.8, median: 9.0, range 0-45), mean PIDAQ score 20.5 (SD ± 11.37, median: 17.0, range 0-52). A slight tendency that presence of a moderate/severe peri-implantitis lowers satisfaction could be detected (overall satisfaction: ordinal, p = 0.012, VAS, p = 0.026). Also, the factors age, implant position and type of restoration might have an impact on patient's satisfaction.
Patients restored with mostly fixed implant-supported restorations showed a very high patient satisfaction regarding function and aesthetics 10-year after implant placement. The presence of a moderate/severe peri-implantitis showed a slight tendency for influencing patient satisfaction. Due to the cross-sectional design results have to be interpreted with care.
种植体的存活率和种植体成功率(无生物学并发症)是评估种植体治疗成功的重要因素。然而,这些因素并不是唯一的决定因素。患者满意度在日常实践中也起着非常重要的作用。因此,本研究旨在评估在牙周私人诊所种植 XIVE 和 Frialite 种植体十年后,患者对功能(语音、咀嚼舒适度、稳定性、清洁性)和美观的满意度,并评估口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)。
在种植体植入 10 年±6 个月后,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)对患者进行总体满意度、语音、咀嚼舒适度、稳定性、清洁性和美学方面的问卷调查。通过口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP)和口腔美学心理影响问卷(PIDAQ)评估口腔健康相关生活质量和心理影响。使用回归分析研究患者相关因素(年龄、性别、吸烟、种植体周围炎、种植体位置、修复类型)对 VAS、OHRQoL 和 PIDAQ 的潜在影响。
95 名患者在种植体植入十年后对种植体支持修复的满意度均较高。总体满意度的平均 VAS 评分为 93.0%(SD±9.4,中位数:96.3%,范围 50.0-100%)。平均 OHIP 评分为 11.3(SD±10.8,中位数:9.0,范围 0-45),平均 PIDAQ 评分为 20.5(SD±11.37,中位数:17.0,范围 0-52)。中度/重度种植体周围炎的存在可能会降低患者的满意度,这一趋势较为明显(总体满意度:等级,p=0.012,VAS,p=0.026)。此外,年龄、种植体位置和修复类型等因素可能对患者的满意度有影响。
在牙周私人诊所植入 XIVE 和 Frialite 种植体十年后,患者对功能和美观的满意度非常高,大多数患者接受的是固定种植体支持修复。中度/重度种植体周围炎的存在可能会略微影响患者的满意度。由于本研究采用的是横断面设计,因此结果需要谨慎解释。