• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于发表偏倚校正的类Copas选择模型的最大似然估计和期望最大化算法

Maximum likelihood estimation and EM algorithm of Copas-like selection model for publication bias correction.

作者信息

Ning Jing, Chen Yong, Piao Jin

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Biostatistics. 2017 Jul 1;18(3):495-504. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx004.

DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/kxx004
PMID:28334132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5862358/
Abstract

Publication bias occurs when the published research results are systematically unrepresentative of the population of studies that have been conducted, and is a potential threat to meaningful meta-analysis. The Copas selection model provides a flexible framework for correcting estimates and offers considerable insight into the publication bias. However, maximizing the observed likelihood under the Copas selection model is challenging because the observed data contain very little information on the latent variable. In this article, we study a Copas-like selection model and propose an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for estimation based on the full likelihood. Empirical simulation studies show that the EM algorithm and its associated inferential procedure performs well and avoids the non-convergence problem when maximizing the observed likelihood.

摘要

发表偏倚是指已发表的研究结果系统地不能代表所开展研究的总体情况,这对有意义的荟萃分析构成潜在威胁。Copas选择模型为校正估计提供了一个灵活的框架,并对发表偏倚提供了相当多的见解。然而,在Copas选择模型下最大化观察到的似然性具有挑战性,因为观察到的数据包含关于潜在变量的信息非常少。在本文中,我们研究了一个类似Copas的选择模型,并基于完全似然性提出了一种期望最大化(EM)算法进行估计。实证模拟研究表明,EM算法及其相关的推断程序表现良好,并且在最大化观察到的似然性时避免了不收敛问题。

相似文献

1
Maximum likelihood estimation and EM algorithm of Copas-like selection model for publication bias correction.用于发表偏倚校正的类Copas选择模型的最大似然估计和期望最大化算法
Biostatistics. 2017 Jul 1;18(3):495-504. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx004.
2
Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies.Copas 型选择模型校正诊断测试研究系统评价中的发表偏倚。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):2912-2923. doi: 10.1177/0962280218791602. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
3
Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.实证评估表明,Copas选择模型在80%的荟萃分析中提供了有用的总结。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):624-631.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
4
EMBRACE: An EM-based bias reduction approach through Copas-model estimation for quantifying the evidence of selective publishing in network meta-analysis.拥抱:通过 Copas 模型估计进行基于 EM 的偏差减少方法,用于定量评估网络荟萃分析中选择性发表的证据。
Biometrics. 2022 Jun;78(2):754-765. doi: 10.1111/biom.13441. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta-analysis.利用临床试验注册库为 Copas 选择模型提供信息,以评估荟萃分析中的发表偏倚。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Sep;12(5):658-673. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1506. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
6
Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.经验评估表明,Copas 选择模型优于修剪填充方法,可用于荟萃分析中的选择偏差。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;63(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.008.
7
A likelihood-based sensitivity analysis for publication bias on the summary receiver operating characteristic in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.基于似然比的综合诊断准确性试验汇总受试者工作特征曲线发表偏倚的敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2023 Mar 15;42(6):781-798. doi: 10.1002/sim.9643. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
8
A selection model for accounting for publication bias in a full network meta-analysis.一种用于在全网络荟萃分析中解释发表偏倚的选择模型。
Stat Med. 2014 Dec 30;33(30):5399-412. doi: 10.1002/sim.6321. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
9
Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.诊断研究连续生物标志物荟萃分析中发表偏倚的敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 10;37(3):327-342. doi: 10.1002/sim.7510. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
10
Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.检测和纠正荟萃分析中的发表偏倚——一种截断正态分布方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2722-2741. doi: 10.1177/0962280216684671. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating Preprints in Systematic Reviews: A Preliminary Study of a Novel Method for Rapid Evidence Synthesis.将预印本纳入系统评价:快速证据综合新方法的初步研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 16:2025.07.15.25331581. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.25331581.
2
Ideas for how informaticians can get involved with COVID-19 research.关于信息学家如何参与COVID-19研究的想法。
BioData Min. 2020 May 12;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13040-020-00213-y. eCollection 2020.
3
Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies.Copas 型选择模型校正诊断测试研究系统评价中的发表偏倚。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):2912-2923. doi: 10.1177/0962280218791602. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.Meta分析中处理发表偏倚的统计方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Jan 30;34(2):343-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.6342. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
2
Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study.诊断性Meta分析中发表偏倚的检测:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2014 Aug 15;33(18):3061-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.6177. Epub 2014 Apr 20.
3
A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis.完全贝叶斯法在 Copas 选择模型中的应用,用于扩展至网络荟萃分析中的发表偏倚。
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):51-66. doi: 10.1002/sim.5494. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
4
Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.多变量荟萃分析:潜力与前景。
Stat Med. 2011 Sep 10;30(20):2481-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.4172. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
5
Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.经验评估表明,Copas 选择模型优于修剪填充方法,可用于荟萃分析中的选择偏差。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;63(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.008.
6
Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.实证评估表明,Copas选择模型在80%的荟萃分析中提供了有用的总结。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):624-631.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
7
Assessing the implications of publication bias for two popular estimates of between-study variance in meta-analysis.评估发表偏倚对荟萃分析中两种常用的研究间方差估计值的影响。
Biometrics. 2007 Mar;63(1):187-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00663.x.
8
Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies.利用期刊影响因子校正医学研究中的发表偏倚。
Biometrics. 2006 Sep;62(3):785-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00513.x.
9
Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.两种用于检测Meta分析中发表偏倚的方法比较
JAMA. 2006 Feb 8;295(6):676-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.6.676.
10
Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis.荟萃分析、漏斗图和敏感性分析。
Biostatistics. 2000 Sep;1(3):247-62. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247.