• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸烟者对戒烟建议来源的认知:国际烟草控制四国调查澳大利亚部分的调查结果

Smokers' perceptions of sources of advice about quitting: findings from the Australian arm of the ITC 4-country survey.

作者信息

Balmford James, Borland Ron

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2017 Apr 1;32(2):124-133. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx032.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyx032
PMID:28334770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5914346/
Abstract

Smokers are exposed to advice about quitting from numerous sources. Within the 2013 ITC 4-Country Survey, 1211 Australian smokers or recent ex-smokers rated the perceived importance of eight sources of advice, categorized into evidence-based, non evidence-based, personal experience and vicarious experience (two items each), and also rated their intention to quit, nicotine dependence, use of quit medication, health concerns and harm beliefs. The eight items were all positively correlated. Respondents who placed greater importance on their experiences (either personal or vicarious) were more likely to agree that the evidence for smoking-related harm is exaggerated, and although not more likely to intend to quit overall, these responses were most strongly related to quit intention. Notably, of those responding that all sources were 'not at all important' (or don't know), only 3.2% reported any interest in quitting in the next 6 months (compared to 36.0% among those who endorsed any), 12.8% were often concerned about smoking's effect on their health (compared with 60.4%), and 73.7% agreed that 'smoking is no more risky than other things' (compared with 34.5%). There was no evidence that rejecting evidence-based sources (medical or governmental) in favour of other sources was associated with lower quit intentions or behaviour.

摘要

吸烟者会从众多渠道获得关于戒烟的建议。在2013年国际烟草控制四国调查中,1211名澳大利亚吸烟者或近期戒烟者对八种建议来源的感知重要性进行了评分,这些来源分为循证、非循证、个人经历和间接经历(各两项),他们还对自己的戒烟意愿、尼古丁依赖、使用戒烟药物、健康担忧和危害认知进行了评分。这八个项目均呈正相关。那些更重视自身经历(个人经历或间接经历)的受访者更有可能认同吸烟相关危害的证据被夸大了,而且尽管总体上不太可能有戒烟意愿,但这些回答与戒烟意愿的关联最为紧密。值得注意的是,在那些认为所有来源“完全不重要”(或不知道)的受访者中,只有3.2%表示在未来6个月内有任何戒烟意愿(相比之下,认可任何来源的受访者中有36.0%),12.8%经常担心吸烟对其健康的影响(相比之下为60.4%),73.7%同意“吸烟并不比其他事情更有风险”(相比之下为34.5%)。没有证据表明拒绝循证来源(医学或政府来源)而倾向于其他来源与较低的戒烟意愿或行为有关。

相似文献

1
Smokers' perceptions of sources of advice about quitting: findings from the Australian arm of the ITC 4-country survey.吸烟者对戒烟建议来源的认知:国际烟草控制四国调查澳大利亚部分的调查结果
Health Educ Res. 2017 Apr 1;32(2):124-133. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx032.
2
Identifying factors that conjointly influence nicotine vaping product relative harm perception among smokers and recent ex-smokers: Findings from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.鉴定共同影响吸烟者和近期戒烟者对尼古丁电子烟产品相对危害感知的因素:来自 2016 年国际烟草控制政策评估项目四国家吸烟与电子烟调查的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108370. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108370. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Cross-country comparison of smokers' reasons for thinking about quitting over time: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey (ITC-4C), 2002-2015.跨国比较吸烟者随时间变化思考戒烟的原因:来自国际烟草控制四项国家调查(ITC-4C),2002-2015 年的调查结果。
Tob Control. 2017 Nov;26(6):641-648. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053299. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
4
The relation between number of smoking friends, and quit intentions, attempts, and success: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.吸烟朋友数量与戒烟意愿、尝试及成功之间的关系:国际烟草控制(ITC)四国调查结果
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Dec;28(4):1144-52. doi: 10.1037/a0036483. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Smoking cessation among Hong Kong Chinese smokers attending hospital as outpatients: impact of doctors' advice, successful quitting and intention to quit.香港华人门诊吸烟者的戒烟情况:医生建议、成功戒烟及戒烟意愿的影响
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2004;16(2):115-20. doi: 10.1177/101053950401600207.
6
Predictors of intentions to quit smoking in Aboriginal tobacco smokers of reproductive age in regional New South Wales (NSW), Australia: quantitative and qualitative findings of a cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)地区育龄原住民吸烟者戒烟意愿的预测因素:一项横断面调查的定量和定性研究结果
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 13;5(3):e007020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007020.
7
Prospective predictors of quitting behaviours among adult smokers in six cities in China: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey.中国六个城市成年吸烟者戒烟行为的前瞻性预测因素:国际烟草控制(ITC)中国调查结果。
Addiction. 2011 Jul;106(7):1335-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03444.x. Epub 2011 May 27.
8
Quitting smoking in China: findings from the ITC China Survey.在中国戒烟:来自 ITC 中国调查的结果。
Tob Control. 2010 Oct;19 Suppl 2(Suppl_2):i12-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.031179.
9
Implicit theories of smoking and association with interest in quitting among current smokers.吸烟的内隐理论与当前吸烟者戒烟意愿的关联。
J Behav Med. 2020 Aug;43(4):544-552. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00058-9. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Quitting activity and tobacco brand switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey.戒烟行为与烟草品牌转换:国际烟草控制四国调查结果
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Apr;39(2):109-13. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12323.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in norms towards the use of nicotine vaping products among adult smokers, former smokers and nicotine vaping product users: cross-sectional findings from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.成年吸烟者、戒烟者和尼古丁电子烟使用者对使用尼古丁电子烟产品规范的差异:2016 年 ITC 四国吸烟与电子烟调查的横断面研究结果。
Addiction. 2019 Oct;114 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):97-106. doi: 10.1111/add.14648. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
2
The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project.国际烟草控制(ITC)政策评估项目的概念框架。
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii3-11. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.015438.
3
Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.国际烟草控制(ITC)四国调查方法
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii12-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013870.
4
Unravelling gossamer with boxing gloves: problems in explaining the decline in smoking.戴着拳击手套拆解蛛丝:解释吸烟率下降存在的问题。
BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):429-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.429.
5
Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day.衡量吸烟程度:采用自我报告的每天吸第一支烟的时间和每天吸烟的数量。
Br J Addict. 1989 Jul;84(7):791-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x.