Kahlenberg Lindsay, Harsey Lindsay, Patterson Mary, Wachsberger Don, Gothard Dave, Holder Michael, Forbes Michael, Tirodker Urmila
Division of Emergency Medicine,
Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio; and.
Hosp Pediatr. 2017 Apr;7(4):225-231. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2016-0089.
Major adverse events (AEs) related to pediatric deep sedation occur at a low frequency but can be of high acuity. The high volume of deep sedations performed by 3 departments at our institution provided an opportunity to reduce variability and increase safety through implementation of a procedural sedation safety checklist. We hypothesized that implementation of a checklist would improve compliance of critical safety elements (CSEs) (primary outcome variable) and reduce the sedation-related AE rate (secondary outcome variable).
This process improvement project was divided into 5 phases: a retrospective analysis to assess variability in capture of CSE within 3 departments that perform deep sedation and the association between noncapture of CSE and AE occurrence (phase 1), design of the checklist and trial in simulation (phase 2), provider education (phase 3), implementation and interim analysis of checklist completion (phase 4), and final analysis of completion and impact on outcome (phase 5).
We demonstrated interdepartmental variability in compliance with CSE completion prechecklist implementation, and we identified elements associated with AEs. Completion of provider education was 100% in all 3 departments. Final analysis showed a checklist completion rate of 75%, and its use significantly improved capture of several critical safety elements. Its use did not significantly reduce AEs ( = .105).
This study demonstrates that the implementation of a sedation checklist improved process adherence and capture of critical safety elements; however, it failed to show a significant reduction in sedation-related AEs.
与儿科深度镇静相关的严重不良事件(AE)发生频率较低,但可能具有较高的严重性。我们机构的3个科室进行了大量的深度镇静操作,这为通过实施程序性镇静安全检查表来减少变异性并提高安全性提供了机会。我们假设实施检查表将提高关键安全要素(CSE)的合规性(主要结局变量),并降低与镇静相关的AE发生率(次要结局变量)。
这个过程改进项目分为5个阶段:回顾性分析,以评估进行深度镇静的3个科室在CSE记录方面的变异性,以及未记录CSE与AE发生之间的关联(第1阶段);检查表的设计和模拟试验(第2阶段);提供者教育(第3阶段);检查表完成情况的实施和中期分析(第4阶段);以及完成情况和对结局影响的最终分析(第5阶段)。
我们证明了在实施检查表前各科室在CSE完成情况的合规性方面存在部门间差异,并且我们确定了与AE相关的要素。所有3个科室的提供者教育完成率均为100%。最终分析显示检查表完成率为75%,其使用显著改善了几个关键安全要素的记录。其使用并未显著降低AE(P = 0.105)。
本研究表明,镇静检查表的实施改善了流程依从性和关键安全要素的记录;然而,它未能显示出与镇静相关的AE有显著减少。