• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模拟的 ABCDE 式认知辅助在急诊医疗服务 CHecklist 在院前环境中的随机试验:CHIPS 研究。

A simulation-based randomized trial of ABCDE style cognitive aid for emergency medical services CHecklist In Prehospital Settings: the CHIPS-study.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), University Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51429, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 17;31(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01144-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13049-023-01144-3
PMID:37978554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10655407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Checklists are a powerful tool for reduction of mortality and morbidity. Checklists structure complex processes in a reproducible manner, optimize team interaction, and prevent errors related to human factors. Despite wide dissemination of the checklist, effects of checklist use in the prehospital emergency medicine are currently unclear. The aim of the study was to demonstrate that participants achieve higher adherence to guideline-recommended actions, manage the scenario more time-efficient, and thirdly demonstrate better adherence to the ABCDE-compliant workflow in a simulated ROSC situation.

METHODS

CHIPS was a prospective randomized case-control study. Professional emergency medical service teams were asked to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation on an adult high-fidelity patient simulator achieving ROSC. The intervention group used a checklist which transferred the ERC guideline statements of ROSC into the structure of the 'ABCDE' mnemonic. Guideline adherence (performance score, PS), utilization of process time (items/minute) and workflow were measured by analyzing continuous A/V recordings of the simulation. Pre- and post-questionnaires addressing demographics and relevance of the checklist were recorded. Effect sizes were determined by calculating Cohen's d. The level of significance was defined at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty scenarios in the intervention group (INT) and twenty-one in the control group (CON) were evaluated. The average time of use of the checklist (CU) in the INT was 6.32 min (2.39-9.18 min; SD = 2.08 min). Mean PS of INT was significantly higher than CON, with a strong effect size (p = 0.001, d = 0.935). In the INT, significantly more items were completed per minute of scenario duration (INT, 1.48 items/min; CON, 1.15 items/min, difference: 0.33/min (25%), p = 0.001), showing a large effect size (d = 1.11). The workflow did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.079), although a medium effect size was shown (d = 0.563) with the tendency of the CON group deviating stronger from the ABCDE than the INT.

CONCLUSION

Checklists can have positive effects on outcome in the prehospital setting by significantly facilitates adherence to guidelines. Checklist use may be time-effective in the prehospital setting. Checklists based on the 'ABCDE' mnemonic can be used according to the 'do verify' approach. Team Time Outs are recommended to start and finish checklists.

摘要

背景

清单是降低死亡率和发病率的有力工具。清单以可重复的方式构建复杂的流程,优化团队协作,并防止与人为因素相关的错误。尽管清单已广泛传播,但目前尚不清楚清单在院前急救医学中的使用效果。本研究旨在证明参与者在推荐的操作指南方面具有更高的依从性,更有效地管理场景,并且在模拟的 ROSC 情况下,第三,更好地遵守 ABCDE 合规工作流程。

方法

CHIPS 是一项前瞻性随机病例对照研究。要求专业的紧急医疗服务团队对成人高保真患者模拟器进行心肺复苏,以达到 ROSC。干预组使用了一份清单,该清单将 ERC 复苏指南中的陈述转化为“ABCDE”助记符的结构。通过分析模拟的连续 A/V 记录来测量指南的依从性(表现评分,PS)、使用过程时间(项目/分钟)和工作流程。记录了针对人口统计学和清单相关性的预和后调查问卷。通过计算 Cohen 的 d 来确定效应量。显著性水平定义为 p<0.05。

结果

干预组(INT)评估了 20 个场景,对照组(CON)评估了 21 个场景。INT 中清单的平均使用时间(CU)为 6.32 分钟(2.39-9.18 分钟;SD=2.08 分钟)。INT 的平均 PS 明显高于 CON,具有很强的效应量(p=0.001,d=0.935)。在 INT 中,每分钟场景持续时间完成的项目明显更多(INT,1.48 个/分钟;CON,1.15 个/分钟,差异:0.33/分钟(25%),p=0.001),具有较大的效应量(d=1.11)。虽然显示出中等效应量(d=0.563),但 CON 组明显偏离 ABCDE 的趋势强于 INT 组,但两组之间的工作流程没有显著差异(p=0.079)。

结论

清单可以通过显著提高对指南的依从性,对院前环境中的结果产生积极影响。清单的使用在院前环境中可能是有效的。基于“ABCDE”助记符的清单可以根据“做验证”方法使用。建议使用团队时间休息来启动和完成清单。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/6c89b8e64e4d/13049_2023_1144_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/c7a1c9b417de/13049_2023_1144_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/15887fadca41/13049_2023_1144_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/2dbf49de94cf/13049_2023_1144_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/6c89b8e64e4d/13049_2023_1144_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/c7a1c9b417de/13049_2023_1144_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/15887fadca41/13049_2023_1144_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/2dbf49de94cf/13049_2023_1144_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/10655407/6c89b8e64e4d/13049_2023_1144_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A simulation-based randomized trial of ABCDE style cognitive aid for emergency medical services CHecklist In Prehospital Settings: the CHIPS-study.基于模拟的 ABCDE 式认知辅助在急诊医疗服务 CHecklist 在院前环境中的随机试验:CHIPS 研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 17;31(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01144-3.
2
Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at hospital arrival - survival and neurological outcome without extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.院外心搏骤停伴心肺复苏到达医院后持续发作 - 体外心肺复苏术对存活率和神经功能结局无影响。
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 29;22(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2176-9.
3
Extracorporeal versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the Prague OHCA trial.体外心肺复苏与常规心肺复苏治疗难治性院外心脏骤停的比较:布拉格 OHCA 试验的二次分析。
Crit Care. 2022 Oct 27;26(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04199-3.
4
Survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients transported without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation: an observational cohort study.未实现院前自主循环恢复而转运的院外心脏骤停患者的生存率:一项观察性队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85(11):1488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
5
Effect of team-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for emergency medical service providers on pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.团队式心肺复苏培训对急救医疗服务提供者在院外心搏骤停患者中进行院前自主循环恢复的影响。
Resuscitation. 2019 Nov;144:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
6
Age-Specific Differences in the Duration of Prehospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Administered by Emergency Medical Service Providers Necessary to Achieve Favorable Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.院外心脏骤停后,为实现良好的神经学转归,紧急医疗服务提供者进行的院外心肺复苏持续时间的年龄特异性差异。
Circ J. 2017 Apr 25;81(5):652-659. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1251. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
7
Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Arrest Patients Following Prehospital Treatment with Therapeutic Hypothermia.院外治疗性低温治疗后心脏骤停患者的临床结局
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):452-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004987. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
8
A comparison of the universal TOR Guideline to the absence of prehospital ROSC and duration of resuscitation in predicting futility from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.将通用的目标温度管理(TOR)指南与院外心脏骤停患者未实现院前自主循环恢复(ROSC)及复苏持续时间进行比较,以预测救治的徒劳性。
Resuscitation. 2017 Feb;111:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Association between the number of prehospital defibrillation attempts and a sustained return of spontaneous circulation: a retrospective, multicentre, registry-based study.院前除颤尝试次数与自主循环持续恢复的相关性:一项回顾性、多中心、基于登记的研究。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Jun;40(6):424-430. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-212091. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
10
Duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Results from a severity stratification analysis.院外心脏骤停后无院前自主循环恢复患者心肺复苏持续时间:严重程度分层分析的结果。
Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids.基于模拟的医疗急救认知辅助工具随机试验。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 11;30(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01028-y.
2
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Education for resuscitation.欧洲复苏委员会 2021 指南:复苏教育。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:388-407. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances.欧洲复苏理事会 2021 指南:特殊情况下的心脏骤停。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:152-219. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
4
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support.欧洲复苏理事会指南 2021:成人高级生命支持。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:115-151. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Effects of the application of a checklist during trauma resuscitations on ATLS adherence, team performance, and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review.创伤复苏期间应用检查表对高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)依从性、团队绩效和患者相关结局的影响:一项系统评价
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01181-7. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
6
Improved pre-hospital care efficiency due to the implementation of pre-hospital trauma life support (PHTLS) algorithms.由于实施了院前创伤生命支持 (PHTLS) 算法,提高了院前急救效率。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Dec;46(6):1321-1325. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01141-1. Epub 2019 May 11.
7
Postresuscitation Care after Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Clinical Update and Focus on Targeted Temperature Management.心肺复苏后治疗:临床更新及目标体温管理重点
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jul;131(1):186-208. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002700.
8
Implementation of a Modified WHO Pediatric Procedural Sedation Safety Checklist and Its Impact on Risk Reduction.改良版世界卫生组织儿科操作镇静安全检查表的实施及其对降低风险的影响。
Hosp Pediatr. 2017 Apr;7(4):225-231. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2016-0089.
9
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
10
Use of checklists improves the quality and safety of prehospital emergency care.使用检查表可提高院前急救护理的质量和安全性。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;24(2):114-119. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000315.