Inglis Tom, Armour Paul, Inglis Grahame, Hooper Gary
Orthopaedic Trainee, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch.
Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch.
N Z Med J. 2017 Mar 24;130(1452):39-48.
The aim of this paper is to outline the development of a triage system for elective hip and knee referrals to the Orthopaedic Department of the Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB), and to determine the unmet need within this population for accessing first specialist assessment (FSA).
Between 1 August 2015 and 31 March 2016 data was collected from all elective hip and knee referrals that underwent triage for a FSA. The number of outpatient appointments available according to the government four-month waiting time is set by the CDHB. Patients were triaged by two consultant surgeons on the basis of their referral letter and radiological imaging into one of five categories: accepted for FSA, insufficient information, no capacity, low priority or direct entry to waiting list (if already seen by a specialist). Those not accepted for an FSA were returned to general practitioner (GP) care.
During the study period there were 1,733 referrals (838 hip related referrals and 895 knee related referrals) to the orthopaedic department with a request for FSA. All patients had failed conservative management. Of these referrals 43% of hip and 54% of knee related referrals could not be offered an FSA and were returned, following triage, to general practitioner care unseen. Only 8% and 9% respectively were declined for insufficient information in the referral letter or lack of need.
This study details the implementation of a triage system for elective hip and knee referrals to the CDHB and with accurate data we have been able to determine the large number of patients unable to access a specialist opinion. These patients represent the unmet need within our community and highlights the degree of rationing taking place within the public hospital.
本文旨在概述坎特伯雷地区卫生委员会(CDHB)骨科选择性髋关节和膝关节转诊分诊系统的发展情况,并确定该人群中未满足的首次专科评估(FSA)需求。
在2015年8月1日至2016年3月31日期间,收集了所有接受FSA分诊的选择性髋关节和膝关节转诊数据。CDHB根据政府设定的四个月等待时间确定了可提供的门诊预约数量。两名顾问外科医生根据转诊信和放射影像将患者分为五类之一:接受FSA、信息不足、无能力、低优先级或直接进入等候名单(如果已经看过专科医生)。那些未被接受FSA的患者被转回全科医生(GP)处治疗。
在研究期间,有1733例转诊(838例与髋关节相关的转诊和895例与膝关节相关的转诊)至骨科,要求进行FSA。所有患者保守治疗均失败。在这些转诊中,43%的髋关节相关转诊和54%的膝关节相关转诊在分诊后无法获得FSA,未经诊治就被转回全科医生处。分别只有8%和9%的患者因转诊信信息不足或不需要而被拒绝。
本研究详细介绍了CDHB选择性髋关节和膝关节转诊分诊系统的实施情况,通过准确的数据我们能够确定大量无法获得专科意见的患者。这些患者代表了我们社区中未满足的需求,并凸显了公立医院内的配给程度。