• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎间孔内镜下腰椎椎间融合术:平均46个月随访的临床及影像学结果

Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up.

作者信息

Lee Sang-Ho, Erken H Yener, Bae Junseok

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3731983. doi: 10.1155/2017/3731983. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1155/2017/3731983
PMID:28337448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5350405/
Abstract

. Spinal fusion has been shown to be the preferred surgical option to reduce pain, recover function, and increase quality of life in the treatment of a variety of lumbar spinal disorders. The main goal of the present study is to report our clinical experience and results of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) applications using the expandable spacer in a single institution. . We performed a retrospective review of 18 patients with >12-month follow-up who had been operated on PELIF using expandable spacer from 2001 to 2007. Their clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. . The mean follow-up period was 46 months. The mean DH before the surgery was 8.3 mm which improved to 11.4 mm at the early postoperative period and regressed to 9.3 mm at the last follow-up visit. The VAS-B, VAS-L, and ODI scores at the last follow-up showed a 54%, 72%, and 69% improvement from the preoperative period, respectively. . The presented PELIF technique with the expandable spacer seems to be a promising surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of lumbar spinal disorders. Conversely, radiological results including disc space subsidence make the stand-alone application of the expandable spacer debatable.

摘要

脊柱融合术已被证明是治疗各种腰椎疾病时减轻疼痛、恢复功能和提高生活质量的首选手术方式。本研究的主要目的是报告我们在单一机构中使用可扩张椎间融合器进行经皮椎间孔镜腰椎椎间融合术(PELIF)的临床经验和结果。我们对2001年至2007年期间接受使用可扩张椎间融合器的PELIF手术且随访超过12个月的18例患者进行了回顾性研究。收集并分析了他们的临床和影像学数据。平均随访期为46个月。术前平均椎间隙高度为8.3毫米,术后早期改善至11.4毫米,末次随访时回落至9.3毫米。末次随访时的VAS-B、VAS-L和ODI评分较术前分别改善了54%、72%和69%。所介绍的使用可扩张椎间融合器的PELIF技术似乎是治疗各种腰椎疾病的一种有前景的手术技术。相反,包括椎间隙塌陷在内的影像学结果使得可扩张椎间融合器的单独应用存在争议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0f/5350405/0f26c601f7ef/BMRI2017-3731983.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0f/5350405/6a3bcff5ab0e/BMRI2017-3731983.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0f/5350405/995ce9536367/BMRI2017-3731983.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0f/5350405/0f26c601f7ef/BMRI2017-3731983.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0f/5350405/6a3bcff5ab0e/BMRI2017-3731983.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0f/5350405/995ce9536367/BMRI2017-3731983.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0f/5350405/0f26c601f7ef/BMRI2017-3731983.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up.经皮椎间孔内镜下腰椎椎间融合术:平均46个月随访的临床及影像学结果
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3731983. doi: 10.1155/2017/3731983. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
2
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: A Consecutive Case Series with Mean 2-Year Follow-Up.经皮椎间孔内镜下腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病:平均2年随访的连续病例系列
Pain Physician. 2020 Mar;23(2):165-174.
3
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Mini-open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Oblique Self-anchored Stand-alone Cages for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study With 2-year Follow-up.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与微创前路腰椎体间融合术联合斜向自锚式单臂椎间融合器治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究:2 年随访结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Nov 1;42(21):E1259-E1265. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002145.
4
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
5
Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与股骨皮质骨同种异体移植作为单节段椎间融合器在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):534-9. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.6.534.
6
Clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal endoscopic discectomy-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion: preliminary results.脊柱内镜下椎间盘切除术辅助斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术的临床和影像学结果:初步结果
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E13. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17196.
7
[Effectiveness of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with microscope in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease].显微镜辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;27(3):268-73.
8
Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间融合术(ULIF)与传统后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)的临床和影像学结果比较:1 年随访。
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Sep;42(3):753-761. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01114-3. Epub 2019 May 29.
9
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症
World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.056. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.前路腹膜后与后路经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的功能和影像学结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E2. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20374.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques for lumbar disc herniation: a comprehensive review.腰椎间盘突出症微创手术技术进展:综述
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 17;12:1593195. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1593195. eCollection 2025.
2
Full-Percutaneous Trans-Kambin Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Large-Footprint Interbody Cage.使用大尺寸椎间融合器的全经皮经坎宾腰椎椎间融合术
Global Spine J. 2025 Feb 8:21925682251318653. doi: 10.1177/21925682251318653.
3
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Versus Full-Endoscopic/Percutaneous TLIF With a Large-Footprint Interbody Cage: A Comparative Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion without general anesthesia: initial clinical experience with 1-year follow-up.无需全身麻醉的内镜下微创经椎间孔椎间融合术:1年随访的初步临床经验
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Feb;40(2):E13. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.FOCUS15435.
2
Percutaneous Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (pTLIF) with a Posterolateral Approach for the Treatment of Denegerative Disk Disease: Feasibility and Preliminary Results.经皮椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(pTLIF)联合后外侧入路治疗退行性椎间盘疾病:可行性及初步结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Jul 27;9:41. doi: 10.14444/2041. eCollection 2015.
3
前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)与使用大尺寸椎间融合器的全内镜/经皮经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF):一项对比观察性研究。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan 26:21925682251316280. doi: 10.1177/21925682251316280.
4
Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion results in less perioperative opioid usage compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single institution, multi-surgeon retrospective study.与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术相比,经皮腰椎椎间融合术的围手术期阿片类药物使用量更少:一项单机构、多外科医生的回顾性研究。
J Spine Surg. 2024 Jun 21;10(2):190-203. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-132. Epub 2024 May 17.
5
Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases.后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)与改良经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(M-TLIF)治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的安全性和疗效比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 30;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04531-3.
6
Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效及并发症比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 27;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04549-7.
7
Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway with modified biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a large cage. Comparative study with minimally invasive microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.改良双通道内镜经椎间孔腰椎体间融合后路大通道融合器与微创显微镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的加速康复外科路径比较研究。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2853-2862. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07747-9. Epub 2023 May 21.
8
Full-Endoscopic Removal of Migrated and Pseudoarthrotic Lumbar Interbody Cages: Case Reports and Technical Note.全内镜下取出移位和假关节形成的腰椎椎间融合器:病例报告及技术说明
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):370-379. doi: 10.14444/8451. Epub 2023 May 1.
9
Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Osteobiologics for Lumbar Fusion.腰椎椎间融合术及用于腰椎融合的骨生物制剂
Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):1022-1033. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0435. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.内镜与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效及并发症比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2023 Jun;13(5):1394-1404. doi: 10.1177/21925682221142545. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
True Percutaneous Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Case Illustrations, Surgical Technique, and Limitations.
真正的经皮椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:病例说明、手术技术及局限性
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;77(4):344-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558821. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
4
Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT.谁应该接受退行性脊椎滑脱症的手术治疗?SPORT 中的治疗效果预测因子。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 1;38(21):1799-811. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a314d0.
5
Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?经皮内镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:值得吗?
Int Orthop. 2013 Aug;37(8):1507-10. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1905-6. Epub 2013 May 9.
6
Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.器械辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF):至少5年的临床和影像学结果随访
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):E302-E309. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827415cd.
7
Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: differences between surgical techniques.腰椎融合术对邻近节段的影响:手术技术的差异。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 1;37(17):1456-62. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824da81d.
8
Usefulness of an expandable interbody spacer for the treatment of foraminal stenosis in extremely collapsed disks: preliminary clinical experience with endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal approach.可扩张椎间融合器治疗极度塌陷椎间盘椎间孔狭窄的有效性:内镜下后外侧经椎间孔入路的初步临床经验
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Dec;24(8):485-91. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182064614.
9
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.经皮椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1615-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3.
10
Percutaneous posterior-lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a B-Twin expandable spinal spacer.经皮后路腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性椎间盘疾病,使用 B-Twin 可扩张式脊柱 spacer。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Feb;19(2):325-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1167-6. Epub 2009 Sep 26.