Suppr超能文献

使用HybridKnife和ERBEJET 2系统对猪食管进行水刀黏膜下剥离术:一项初步研究。

Waterjet submucosal dissection of porcine esophagus with the HybridKnife and ERBEJET 2 system: a pilot study.

作者信息

Akutsu Daisuke, Suzuki Hideo, Narasaka Toshiaki, Terasaki Masahiko, Kaneko Tsuyoshi, Matsui Hirofumi, Mizokami Yuji, Hyodo Ichinosuke

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Division of Endoscopy, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2017 Jan;5(1):E30-E34. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-122335.

Abstract

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically difficult because of narrow working spaces and ease of perforation due to the lack of serosa. HybridKnife is a recently developed ESD device that is combined with the high pressure waterjet ERBEJET 2 system to lift mucosa. We hypothesized that this waterjet could make submucosal dissection safer and studied this in porcine esophagus.  Water pressures of 30 - 70 bar were tested to determine the appropriate pressure for waterjet ESD with HybridKnife (WJ-ESD) in one pig. WJ-ESD safety and completion were compared with those of conventional ESD using DualKnife (C-ESD) as a reference. Each of three virtual esophageal lesions in two pigs were resected alternatively using both methods from the lower to upper esophagus. For WJ-ESD, the submucosa, apart from hard fibrous tissues, was dissected using water pressure alone.  Using 50 bar of water pressure resulted in the best balance between proper dissection and view-disturbing water backflow. The dissection speeds for the lower, middle, and upper esophagus were 0.2, 0.9, and 0.2 cm/min in 50 bar WJ-ESD and 1.1, 0.5, and 1.0 cm/min in C-ESD, respectively. Minor bleeding was frequent in WJ-ESD, but was easily stopped by electrocoagulation with the same needle. No perforation was observed in either procedure. Thermal damage to dissected tissues appeared mild, and the extent of muscle injury was lower for WJ-ESD (4, 6, and 8 %) compared with C-ESD (14, 16, and 7 %).  WJ-ESD could be completed safely for porcine esophagus with less damage to the muscle layer compared with C-ESD.

摘要

由于操作空间狭窄且缺乏浆膜层易导致穿孔,食管内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)在技术上具有挑战性。HybridKnife是一种最近开发的ESD设备,它与高压水刀ERBEJET 2系统相结合以提升黏膜。我们假设这种水刀可以使黏膜下剥离更安全,并在猪食管中进行了研究。在一头猪身上测试了30-70巴的水压,以确定使用HybridKnife进行水刀ESD(WJ-ESD)的合适压力。将WJ-ESD的安全性和完成情况与以使用双极电刀的传统ESD(C-ESD)作为对照进行比较。在两头猪身上,从食管下部到上部,交替使用这两种方法切除三个虚拟食管病变中的每一个。对于WJ-ESD,除硬纤维组织外,仅使用水压剥离黏膜下层。使用50巴的水压可在适当剥离和影响视野的水回流之间实现最佳平衡。在50巴WJ-ESD中,食管下部、中部和上部的剥离速度分别为0.2、0.9和0.2厘米/分钟,而在C-ESD中分别为1.1、0.5和1.0厘米/分钟。WJ-ESD中频繁出现轻微出血,但使用同一根针进行电凝很容易止血。两种手术均未观察到穿孔。对剥离组织的热损伤似乎较轻,与C-ESD(14%、16%和7%)相比,WJ-ESD对肌肉的损伤程度较低(4%、6%和8%)。与C-ESD相比,WJ-ESD可以安全地完成猪食管手术,对肌肉层的损伤较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a1c/5361881/bd46b45c622f/10-1055-s-0042-122335-i653ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验