Suppr超能文献

损伤中不同凝血病变型的特征:特定通路驱动因素及个体化治疗的意义

Characterization of distinct coagulopathic phenotypes in injury: Pathway-specific drivers and implications for individualized treatment.

作者信息

Christie S Ariane, Kornblith Lucy Z, Howard Benjamin M, Conroy Amanda S, Kunitake Ryan C, Nelson Mary F, Hendrickson Carolyn M, Calfee Carolyn S, Callcut Rachael A, Cohen Mitchell Jay

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery (S.A.C., L.Z.K., B.M.H., A.S.C., R.C.K., M.F.N., C.M.H., C.S.C., R.A.C.), San Francisco General Hospital and the University of California, San Francisco, California; and Denver Health Medical Center and the University of Colorado (M.J.C.), Denver, Colorado.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jun;82(6):1055-1062. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001423.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

International normalized ratio (INR) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) are used interchangeably to diagnose acute traumatic coagulopathy but reflect disparate activation pathways. In this study, we identified injury/patient characteristics and coagulation factors that drive contact pathway, tissue factor pathway (TF), and common pathway dysfunction by examining injured patients with discordant coagulopathies. We hypothesized that patients with INR/PTT discordance reflect differing phenotypes representing contact versus tissue factor pathway perturbations and that characterization will provide targets to guide individualized resuscitation.

METHODS

Plasma samples were prospectively collected from 1,262 critically injured patients at a single Level I trauma center. Standard coagulation measures and an extensive panel of procoagulant and anticoagulant factors were assayed and analyzed with demographic and outcome data.

RESULTS

Fourteen percent of patients were coagulopathic on admission. Among these, 48% had abnormal INR and PTT (BOTH), 43% had isolated prolonged PTT (PTT-CONTACT), and 9% had isolated elevated INR (INR-TF). PTT-CONTACT and BOTH had lower Glasgow Coma Scale score than INR-TF (p < 0.001). INR-TF had decreased factor VII activity compared with PTT-CONTACT, whereas PTT-CONTACT had decreased factor VIII activity compared with INR-TF. All coagulopathic patients had factor V deficits, but activity was lowest in BOTH, suggesting an additive downstream effect of disordered activation pathways. Patients with PTT-CONTACT received half as much packed red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma as did the other groups (p < 0.001). Despite resuscitation, mortality was higher for coagulopathic patients; mortality was highest in BOTH and higher in PTT-CONTACT than in INR-TF (71%, 60%, 41%; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Discordant phenotypes demonstrate differential factor deficiencies consistent with dysfunction of contact versus tissue factor pathways with additive effects from common pathway dysfunction. Recognition and treatment of pathway-specific factor deficiencies driving different coagulopathic phenotypes in injured patients may individualize resuscitation and improve outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiological study, level II.

摘要

背景

国际标准化比值(INR)和部分凝血活酶时间(PTT)在诊断急性创伤性凝血病时可互换使用,但反映的是不同的激活途径。在本研究中,我们通过检查患有不一致凝血病的受伤患者,确定了驱动接触途径、组织因子途径(TF)和共同途径功能障碍的损伤/患者特征及凝血因子。我们假设,INR/PTT不一致的患者反映了代表接触途径与组织因子途径扰动的不同表型,并且这种特征描述将为指导个体化复苏提供靶点。

方法

前瞻性地从一家一级创伤中心的1262例重伤患者中采集血浆样本。对标准凝血指标以及一组广泛的促凝血和抗凝血因子进行检测,并与人口统计学和结局数据进行分析。

结果

14%的患者入院时存在凝血病。其中,48%的患者INR和PTT均异常(两者均异常),43%的患者PTT单独延长(PTT-接触途径异常),9%的患者INR单独升高(INR-TF途径异常)。PTT-接触途径异常组和两者均异常组的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分低于INR-TF途径异常组(p<0.001)。与PTT-接触途径异常组相比,INR-TF途径异常组的因子VII活性降低,而与INR-TF途径异常组相比,PTT-接触途径异常组的因子VIII活性降低。所有凝血病患者均存在因子V缺乏,但两者均异常组的活性最低,提示激活途径紊乱存在叠加的下游效应。PTT-接触途径异常组接受的浓缩红细胞和新鲜冰冻血浆量仅为其他组的一半(p<0.001)。尽管进行了复苏,凝血病患者的死亡率仍较高;两者均异常组的死亡率最高,PTT-接触途径异常组的死亡率高于INR-TF途径异常组(71%、60%、41%;p=0.04)。

结论

不一致的表型显示出不同的因子缺乏,这与接触途径与组织因子途径功能障碍一致,且共同途径功能障碍具有叠加效应。识别和治疗驱动受伤患者不同凝血病表型的途径特异性因子缺乏,可能使复苏个体化并改善结局。

证据水平

预后/流行病学研究,二级。

相似文献

3
A principal component analysis of coagulation after trauma.创伤后凝血的主成分分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 May;74(5):1223-9; discussion 1229-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828b7fa1.
4
Clinical and mechanistic drivers of acute traumatic coagulopathy.急性创伤性凝血病的临床和机制驱动因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S40-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828fa43d.
6
In-depth analysis of clotting dynamics in burn patients.烧伤患者凝血动力学的深入分析。
J Surg Res. 2016 May 15;202(2):341-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Clinical and mechanistic drivers of acute traumatic coagulopathy.急性创伤性凝血病的临床和机制驱动因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S40-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828fa43d.
5
A principal component analysis of coagulation after trauma.创伤后凝血的主成分分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 May;74(5):1223-9; discussion 1229-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828b7fa1.
6
Coagulopathy after traumatic brain injury.颅脑创伤后的凝血功能障碍。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Jun;70(6):1334-45. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824d179b.
10
Resuscitation and transfusion principles for traumatic hemorrhagic shock.创伤性失血性休克的复苏与输血原则
Blood Rev. 2009 Nov;23(6):231-40. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验