Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;46(4):1157-1170. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx013.
Most Chinese people over 55 years old today have experienced the Great Leap Forward Famine of 1959-61. Many reports suggested that the famine could have profound long-term health effects for exposed birth cohorts. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to summarize reported famine effects on long-term health.
Relevant reports were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Chinese Wanfang Data and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Long-term health conditions were compared in exposed birth cohorts and unexposed controls. Fixed-effects models and random-effects models were used to combine results on adult overweight, obesity, type 2 diabetes, hyperglycaemia, hypertension, the metabolic syndrome and schizophrenia. The heterogeneity across reports was assessed. Subgroup analyses were carried out using reported famine severity, provincial mortality during famine, sex and other report characteristics.
In all, 36 reports were eligible for systematic review and 21 could be used for meta-analysis. The number of events we analysed ranged from 1029 for hyperglycaemia to 8973 for hypertension. As reported by others, overweight, type 2 diabetes, hyperglycaemia, the metabolic syndrome, and schizophrenia were more common among adults born during the famine compared with controls born after the famine. By contrast, there were no increases in overweight [odds ratio (OR) 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-1.72], type 2 diabetes (OR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.73-1.28), hyperglycaemia (OR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72-1.36) or the metabolic syndrome (OR 1.11; 95% CI: 1.00-1.22) comparing adults born during the famine with controls born either after or before the famine. For schizophrenia, the effect estimates (OR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.50-1.70, combining control groups) were similar in the two scenarios.
Our findings suggest that uncontrolled age differences between famine and post-famine births could explain most effects commonly attributed to the famine. For more reliable estimates of long-term famine effects in China, other analyses will be needed with age-appropriate controls and better information on the severity and timing of the famine in the populations included.
如今,大多数 55 岁以上的中国人都经历过 1959-61 年的大跃进饥荒。许多报告表明,这场饥荒可能对暴露在其中的出生队列产生深远的长期健康影响。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以总结报告中饥荒对长期健康的影响。
通过检索 PubMed、Embase、中国万方数据和中国国家知识基础设施数据库,确定了相关报告。将暴露于出生队列的人群和未暴露于出生队列的对照组的长期健康状况进行比较。采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型对成人超重、肥胖、2 型糖尿病、高血糖、高血压、代谢综合征和精神分裂症的结果进行合并。评估报告间的异质性。使用报告的饥荒严重程度、饥荒期间省级死亡率、性别和其他报告特征进行亚组分析。
共有 36 份报告符合系统评价标准,其中 21 份可用于荟萃分析。我们分析的事件数量从高血糖的 1029 例到高血压的 8973 例不等。正如其他人所报告的那样,与出生在饥荒后的对照组相比,出生于饥荒期间的成年人中更常见超重、2 型糖尿病、高血糖、代谢综合征和精神分裂症。相比之下,出生于饥荒期间的成年人与出生于饥荒后或之前的对照组相比,超重的发生率没有增加[比值比(OR)0.68;95%置信区间(CI):0.27-1.72]、2 型糖尿病(OR 0.96;95%CI:0.73-1.28)、高血糖(OR 0.99;95%CI:0.72-1.36)或代谢综合征(OR 1.11;95%CI:1.00-1.22)。对于精神分裂症,合并对照组后(OR 1.60;95%CI:1.50-1.70)的效应估计值相似。
我们的研究结果表明,饥荒和饥荒后出生人群之间未得到控制的年龄差异可能解释了通常归因于饥荒的大多数影响。为了更可靠地估计中国长期饥荒的影响,需要使用年龄适当的对照组和所纳入人群中关于饥荒严重程度和时间的更好信息进行其他分析。