Durazo-Arvizu Ramón A, Dawson-Hughes Bess, Kramer Holly, Cao Guichan, Merkel Joyce, Coates Paul M, Sempos Christopher T
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 15;185(8):720-726. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww244.
We evaluated the impact of standardizing the originally measured serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) values from Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988-1994) on the association between 25(OH)D and rate of all-cause mortality. Values were standardized to the gold-standard laboratory method. Follow-up from 1990-2006 consisted of 15,099 participants aged at least 20 years at baseline, among whom there were 3,784 deaths. Relative risk of death was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and season using Poisson regression. Results were obtained for eight 25(OH)D (nmol/L) categories: <20 nmol/L, 20-29 nmol/L, 30-39 nmol/L, 40-49 nmol/L, 50-59 nmol/L, 60-74 nmol/L, 75-99 nmol/L (reference), and ≥100 nmol/L. Assay standardization dramatically shifted original 25(OH)D values toward zero. Accordingly, risk ≥120 nmol/L could not be evaluated (i.e., n = 7 and ndeaths = 2). Relative risk (95% confidence interval (CI)) <40 nmol/L remained significant (30-39 nmol/L: relative risk (RR) = 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.6); 20-29 nmol/L: RR = 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3, 1.9), and <20 nmol/L: RR = 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6, 2.7). However, adjusted relative risk estimates for 25(OH)D levels ≥40 nmol/L were no longer significant (40-49 nmol/L: RR = 1.2 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.4); 50-59 nmol/L: RR = 1.2 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.4); 60-74 nmol/L: RR = 1.1 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.2); 75-99 nmol/L: RR = 1.0 (referent), and ≥100 nmol/L: RR = 1.1 (95% CI: 0.6, 2.1). In summary, after standardization, risk of death from all causes increased with decreasing 25(OH)D <40 nmol/L, while there was no association with values in categories between 40 nmol/L and 120 nmol/L.
我们评估了对第三次全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES III,1988 - 1994年)中最初测量的血清总25 - 羟基维生素D(25(OH)D)值进行标准化,对25(OH)D与全因死亡率之间关联的影响。将这些值按照金标准实验室方法进行标准化。1990年至2006年的随访包括15099名基线年龄至少20岁的参与者,其中有3784人死亡。使用泊松回归对死亡相对风险进行年龄、性别、种族/族裔和季节的校正。针对八个25(OH)D(nmol/L)类别得出结果:<20 nmol/L、20 - 29 nmol/L、30 - 39 nmol/L、40 - 49 nmol/L、50 - 59 nmol/L、60 - 74 nmol/L、75 - 99 nmol/L(参考值)和≥100 nmol/L。检测标准化使原始25(OH)D值大幅向零偏移。因此,无法评估≥120 nmol/L的风险(即,n = 7且ndeaths = 2)。<40 nmol/L的相对风险(95%置信区间(CI))仍然显著(30 - 39 nmol/L:相对风险(RR)= 1.4(95% CI:1.1,1.6);20 - 29 nmol/L:RR = 1.6(95% CI:1.3,1.9),以及<20 nmol/L:RR = 2.1(95% CI:1.6,2.7)。然而,25(OH)D水平≥40 nmol/L的校正相对风险估计不再显著(40 - 49 nmol/L:RR = 1.2(95% CI:0.99,1.4);50 - 59 nmol/L:RR = 1.2(95% CI:1.04,1.4);60 - 74 nmol/L:RR = 1.1(95% CI:0.94,1.2);75 - 99 nmol/L:RR = 1.0(参考值),以及≥100 nmol/L:RR = 1.1(95% CI:0.6,2.1)。总之,标准化后,25(OH)D<40 nmol/L时全因死亡风险随其降低而增加,而40 nmol/L至120 nmol/L各类别值之间无关联。