Mostile Giovanni, Cicero Calogero Edoardo, Giuliano Loretta, Zappia Mario, Nicoletti Alessandra
Department of Medical Sciences, Surgical and Advanced Technologies 'G.F. Ingrassia', University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Mol Med Rep. 2017 May;15(5):3383-3389. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6386. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
A possible association between iron serum levels and Parkinson's disease (PD) using a meta‑analytic approach was evaluated. A systematic MEDLINE search was conducted to identify published observational, case‑control studies dealing with the association between iron blood levels and PD. In both groups, iron blood levels were extracted as means and standard deviations to calculate the standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity of selected studies was investigated. Then, a meta-analysis was performed applying a random effects model. Possible causes of bias were also examined. A meta-regression analysis was finally conducted to investigate whether associations varied according to specified confounding factors. Of 155 studies detected by the research strategy, a total of 23 case‑control studies with full available data were selected based on the adopted criteria. A small, around zero, overall SMD of -0.052 (95% CI, -0.303-0.2) was estimated, indicating no substantial differences between groups among selected studies. High heterogeneity among studies was detected (I2=91.42%; p<0.001). By performing a meta-regression analysis considering single available demographic, geographical and clinical covariates, no significant association was detected. Based on our systematic revision and meta-analysis of available case‑control studies, there was not sufficient evidence supporting a possible significant association between iron serum levels and PD as compared to controls. Principal reasons should be sought in the elevated methodological heterogeneity we found among available studies. A particular attention should be paid on bias and confounding effects to limit heterogeneity among studies and to facilitate the summary of results.
采用荟萃分析方法评估血清铁水平与帕金森病(PD)之间可能存在的关联。通过对MEDLINE进行系统检索,以确定已发表的关于血铁水平与PD关联的观察性病例对照研究。在两组中,提取血铁水平的均值和标准差,以计算95%置信区间(CI)的标准化均值差(SMD)。对所选研究的异质性进行了调查。然后,应用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。还检查了可能的偏倚原因。最后进行荟萃回归分析,以研究关联是否因特定的混杂因素而有所不同。在研究策略检测到的155项研究中,根据采用的标准共选择了23项具有完整可用数据的病例对照研究。估计总体SMD较小,约为零,为-0.052(95%CI,-0.303至0.2),表明所选研究组之间无实质性差异。检测到研究间存在高度异质性(I2=91.42%;p<0.001)。通过对单一可用的人口统计学、地理和临床协变量进行荟萃回归分析,未检测到显著关联。基于我们对现有病例对照研究的系统修订和荟萃分析,与对照组相比,没有足够的证据支持血清铁水平与PD之间可能存在显著关联。主要原因应从我们在现有研究中发现的方法学异质性增加中寻找。应特别关注偏倚和混杂效应,以限制研究间的异质性并便于结果总结。