Chaichian Shahla, Kabir Ali, Mehdizadehkashi Adolfazl, Rahmani Khaled, Moghimi Mehrdad, Moazzami Bahram
Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Center in women, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):185-195.
Pain is considered as one of the main symptoms of endometriosis. The treatment for endometriosis remains controversial.
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of medical or surgical treatments for pain-relief in patients with endometriosis.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Published papers about evaluating pain treatment in endometriosis in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
After searching all studies evaluating pain treatment in endometriosis in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, there were 23 related studies, containing 1,847 patients enrolled in our study. We used a variety of tests: fixed and random effects models, Q Cochrane test and I2 index, Egger and Begg tests, forest and funnel plots, Trim and fill method, and meta-regression in our analysis.
There was no statistically significant difference in pain improvement between surgical and medical treatment. Interestingly, pain relief was more prominent longer after treatment. Both clinical trials and cross sectional studies showed higher improvement in pain than cohort studies. High quality studies and lower body mass index (BMI) had a greater effect on pain relief. All studies were heterogeneous, but there was no publication bias.
There was a higher probability of risk of bias in blinding, random sequence generation, and selective outcome reporting in clinical trial studies entered in our meta-analysis.
Our results could not demonstrate the preference of each medical or surgical treatment effect for dysmenorrhea in endometriosis. Additional data is required before a standardized medical protocol can be offered, but we believe this study may encourage clinicians to consider a less invasive alternative for treating their patients' chronic pelvic pain in the near future.Key words: Endometriosis, pain, meta-analysis, therapy, disease management.
疼痛被认为是子宫内膜异位症的主要症状之一。子宫内膜异位症的治疗仍存在争议。
本研究旨在比较药物治疗或手术治疗对子宫内膜异位症患者缓解疼痛的效果。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
在PubMed、Scopus和谷歌学术上发表的关于评估子宫内膜异位症疼痛治疗的论文。
在PubMed、Scopus和谷歌学术上检索所有评估子宫内膜异位症疼痛治疗的研究后,有23项相关研究,共1847例患者纳入本研究。我们在分析中使用了多种检验方法:固定效应模型和随机效应模型、Q Cochrane检验和I²指数、Egger检验和Begg检验、森林图和漏斗图、Trim and fill方法以及meta回归。
手术治疗和药物治疗在疼痛改善方面无统计学显著差异。有趣的是,治疗后更长时间疼痛缓解更明显。临床试验和横断面研究显示疼痛改善程度高于队列研究。高质量研究和较低体重指数(BMI)对疼痛缓解的影响更大。所有研究均存在异质性,但无发表偏倚。
纳入我们荟萃分析的临床试验研究在盲法、随机序列生成和选择性结果报告方面存在较高的偏倚风险。
我们的结果未能证明药物治疗或手术治疗对子宫内膜异位症痛经的疗效偏好。在提供标准化医疗方案之前还需要更多数据,但我们相信本研究可能会鼓励临床医生在不久的将来考虑采用侵入性较小的替代方法来治疗患者的慢性盆腔疼痛。关键词:子宫内膜异位症、疼痛、荟萃分析、治疗、疾病管理。