Department of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.
Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):1944-1950. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw315.
Measurement of circulating biomarkers of fibrosis may have a role in selecting patients and treatment strategy for catheter ablation. Pro-collagen type III N-terminal pro-peptide (PIIINP), C-telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), and galectin 3 (gal-3) have all been suggested as possible biomarkers for this indication, but studies assessing whether peripheral levels reflect intra-cardiac levels are scarce.
We studied 93 patients undergoing ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) (n = 63) or non-paroxysmal AF (n = 30). Femoral venous, left and right atrial, and coronary sinus blood were analysed using ELISA to determine biomarker levels. Levels were compared with control patients (n = 36) and baseline characteristics, including left atrial voltage mapping data. C-telopeptide of type I collagen levels were higher in AF than in non-AF patients (P = 0.007). Peripheral ICTP levels were higher than all intra-cardiac levels (P < 0.001). Peripheral gal-3 levels were higher than left atrial levels (P = 0.001). Peripheral levels of FGF-23 and PIIINP were not significantly different from intra-cardiac levels. CS levels of ICTP were higher than right and left atrial levels (P < 0.001). gal-3 was higher in women vs. men (P ≤ 0.001) and with higher body mass index (P ≤ 0.001). ICTP levels increased with reducing ejection fraction (P ≤ 0.012).
Atrial fibrillation patients have higher levels of circulating ICTP than matched non-AF controls. In AF ablation patients, intra-cardiac sampling of FGF-23 or PIIINP gives no further information over peripheral sampling. For gal-3 and ICTP, intra-cardiac sampling may be necessary to assess their association with intra-cardiac processes. None of the biomarkers is related to fibrosis assessed by left atrial voltage.
纤维化的循环生物标志物的测量可能在选择导管消融的患者和治疗策略方面具有作用。前胶原 III 型 N 端前肽(PIIINP)、I 型胶原 C 端肽(ICTP)、成纤维细胞生长因子 23(FGF-23)和半乳糖凝集素 3(gal-3)都被认为是这种适应症的可能的生物标志物,但评估外周水平是否反映心内水平的研究很少。
我们研究了 93 名接受阵发性心房颤动(AF)(n=63)或非阵发性 AF(n=30)消融的患者。使用 ELISA 分析股静脉、左心房和右心房以及冠状窦血样以确定生物标志物水平。将这些水平与对照组患者(n=36)和包括左心房电压测绘数据在内的基线特征进行比较。与非 AF 患者相比,AF 患者的 ICTP 水平更高(P=0.007)。外周 ICTP 水平高于所有心内水平(P<0.001)。外周 gal-3 水平高于左心房水平(P=0.001)。外周 FGF-23 和 PIIINP 水平与心内水平无显著差异。CS ICTP 水平高于右心房和左心房水平(P<0.001)。gal-3 在女性中高于男性(P≤0.001),且与较高的体重指数相关(P≤0.001)。ITCP 水平随着射血分数降低而增加(P≤0.012)。
与匹配的非 AF 对照组相比,AF 患者的循环 ICTP 水平更高。在 AF 消融患者中,FGF-23 或 PIIINP 的心内采样并不能提供比外周采样更多的信息。对于 gal-3 和 ICTP,可能需要心内采样来评估它们与心内过程的关联。没有一种生物标志物与左心房电压评估的纤维化相关。