Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Trust (Part of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust), Sydney Street, London, UK.
Imperial College London, London, UK.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jun;111(6):680-691. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01978-w. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
A high proportion of patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) experience recurrence of arrhythmia. This meta-analysis aims to identify pre-ablation serum biomarker(s) associated with arrhythmia recurrence to improve patient selection before CA.
A systematic approach following PRISMA reporting guidelines was utilised in libraries (Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus) and supplemented by scanning through bibliographies of articles. Biomarker levels were compared using a random-effects model and presented as odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity was examined by meta-regression and subgroup analysis.
In total, 73 studies were identified after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Nine out of 22 biomarkers showed association with recurrence of AF after CA. High levels of N-Terminal-pro-B-type-Natriuretic Peptide [OR (95% CI), 3.11 (1.80-5.36)], B-type Natriuretic Peptide [BNP, 2.91 (1.74-4.88)], high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein [2.04 (1.28-3.23)], Carboxy-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I [1.89 (1.16-3.08)] and Interleukin-6 [1.83 (1.18-2.84)] were strongly associated with identifying patients with AF recurrence. Meta-regression highlighted that AF type had a significant impact on BNP levels (heterogeneity R = 55%). Subgroup analysis showed that high BNP levels were more strongly associated with AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF (PAF) cohorts compared to the addition of non-PAF patients. Egger's test ruled out the presence of publication bias from small-study effects.
Ranking biomarkers based on the strength of association with outcome provides each biomarker relative capacity to predict AF recurrence. This will provide randomised controlled trials, a guide to choosing a priori tool for identifying patients likely to revert to AF, which are required to substantiate these findings.
相当比例的接受导管消融 (CA) 治疗心房颤动 (AF) 的患者会出现心律失常复发。本荟萃分析旨在确定与心律失常复发相关的消融前血清生物标志物,以改善 CA 前患者选择。
采用 PRISMA 报告指南的系统方法检索图书馆(Pubmed/Medline、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus),并通过扫描文章的参考文献进行补充。使用随机效应模型比较生物标志物水平,并以比值比 (OR) 表示。通过 meta 回归和亚组分析检查异质性。
应用纳入和排除标准后,共确定了 73 项研究。9 项 22 项生物标志物中的标志物与 CA 后 AF 复发相关。N 端前 B 型利钠肽 [OR (95%CI),3.11 (1.80-5.36)]、B 型利钠肽 [BNP,2.91 (1.74-4.88)]、高敏 C 反应蛋白 [2.04 (1.28-3.23)]、I 型胶原羧基末端肽 [1.89 (1.16-3.08)] 和白细胞介素-6 [1.83 (1.18-2.84)] 水平较高与识别 AF 复发患者密切相关。Meta 回归突出显示 AF 类型对 BNP 水平有显著影响(异质性 R = 55%)。亚组分析表明,与加入非 PAF 患者相比,高 BNP 水平与阵发性 AF (PAF) 队列中 AF 复发的相关性更强。Egger 检验排除了小样本研究效应引起的发表偏倚。
根据与结局的关联强度对生物标志物进行排序,为每个生物标志物预测 AF 复发的相对能力提供了依据。这将为随机对照试验提供指导,为识别可能恢复 AF 的患者选择预先确定的工具提供依据,这些发现需要得到证实。