Sundin Per-Ola, Sjöström Per, Jones Ian, Olsson Lovisa A, Udumyan Ruzan, Grubb Anders, Lindström Veronica, Montgomery Scott
School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, SE 701 82 Örebro, Sweden.
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):663-670. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx004.
Cystatin C may add explanatory power for associations with mortality in combination with other filtration markers, possibly indicating pathways other than glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, this has not been firmly established since interpretation of associations independent of measured GFR (mGFR) is limited by potential multicollinearity between markers of GFR. The primary aim of this study was to assess associations between cystatin C and mortality, independent of mGFR. A secondary aim was to evaluate the utility of combining cystatin C and creatinine to predict mortality risk.
Cox regression was used to assess the associations of cystatin C and creatinine with mortality in 1157 individuals referred for assessment of plasma clearance of iohexol.
Since cystatin C and creatinine are inversely related to mGFR, cystatin C - 1 and creatinine - 1 were used. After adjustment for mGFR, lower cystatin C - 1 (higher cystatin C concentration) and higher creatinine - 1 (lower creatinine concentration) were independently associated with increased mortality. When nested models were compared, avoiding the potential influence of multicollinearity, the independence of the associations was supported. Among models combining the markers of GFR, adjusted for demographic factors and comorbidity, cystatin C - 1 and creatinine - 1 combined explained the largest proportion of variance in associations with mortality risk ( R 2 = 0.61). Addition of mGFR did not improve the model.
Our results suggest that both creatinine and cystatin C have independent associations with mortality not explained entirely by mGFR and that mGFR does not offer a more precise mortality risk assessment than these endogenous filtration markers combined.
胱抑素C与其他滤过标志物联合使用时,可能为其与死亡率的关联提供额外的解释力,这可能提示了除肾小球滤过率(GFR)之外的其他途径。然而,由于独立于实测GFR(mGFR)的关联解释受到GFR标志物之间潜在多重共线性的限制,这一点尚未得到确凿证实。本研究的主要目的是评估胱抑素C与死亡率之间独立于mGFR的关联。次要目的是评估联合使用胱抑素C和肌酐预测死亡风险的效用。
采用Cox回归分析1157例接受碘海醇血浆清除率评估的个体中胱抑素C和肌酐与死亡率的关联。
由于胱抑素C和肌酐与mGFR呈负相关,因此使用了胱抑素C - 1和肌酐 - 1。在调整mGFR后,较低的胱抑素C - 1(较高的胱抑素C浓度)和较高的肌酐 - 1(较低的肌酐浓度)与死亡率增加独立相关。当比较嵌套模型以避免多重共线性的潜在影响时,这些关联的独立性得到了支持。在结合GFR标志物并根据人口统计学因素和合并症进行调整的模型中,胱抑素C - 1和肌酐 - 1联合解释了与死亡风险关联中最大比例的方差(R² = 0.61)。加入mGFR并没有改善模型。
我们的结果表明,肌酐和胱抑素C与死亡率均存在独立关联,mGFR并不能完全解释这些关联,而且与这些内源性滤过标志物联合使用相比,mGFR并不能提供更精确的死亡风险评估。