Gollan Stuart, Chalmers Samuel, Alderton Stephen, Norton Kevin
Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity (ARENA), Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity (ARENA), Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Sport and Exercise Science, School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Australia.
J Therm Biol. 2017 Apr;65:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
Heat acclimation over consecutive days has been shown to improve aerobic-based performance. Recently, it has been suggested that heat training can improve performance in a temperate environment. However, due to the multifactorial training demands of athletes, consecutive-day heat training may not be suitable. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of brief (8×30min) intermittent (every 3-4 days) supplemental heat training on the second lactate threshold point (LT) in temperate and hot conditions. 21 participants undertook eight intermittent-day mixed-intensity treadmill exercise training sessions in hot (30°C; 50% relative humidity [RH]) or temperate (18°C; 30% RH) conditions. A pre- and post-incremental exercise test occurred in temperate (18°C; 30% RH) and hot conditions (30°C; 50% RH) to determine the change in LT. The heat training protocol did not improve LT in temperate (Effect Size [ES]±90 confidence interval=0.10±0.16) or hot (ES=0.26±0.26) conditions. The primary finding was that although the intervention group had a change greater than the SWC, no statistically significant improvements were observed following an intermittent eight day supplemental heat training protocol comparable to a control group training only in temperate conditions. This is likely due to the brief length of each heat training session and/or the long duration between each heat exposure.
连续多日进行热适应已被证明可提高基于有氧运动的表现。最近,有人提出热训练可以改善在温带环境中的表现。然而,由于运动员的训练需求具有多因素性,连续多日的热训练可能并不合适。当前的研究旨在调查在温带和炎热条件下,短暂(8×30分钟)间歇性(每3 - 4天一次)补充热训练对第二乳酸阈值点(LT)的影响。21名参与者在炎热(30°C;相对湿度50%[RH])或温带(18°C;相对湿度30%)条件下进行了八次间歇性混合强度跑步机运动训练课程。在温带(18°C;相对湿度30%)和炎热(30°C;相对湿度50%)条件下进行了递增运动测试前后评估,以确定LT的变化。热训练方案在温带(效应量[ES]±90%置信区间 = 0.10±0.16)或炎热(ES = 0.26±0.26)条件下均未改善LT。主要发现是,尽管干预组的变化大于最小有临床意义变化值(SWC),但在与仅在温带条件下训练的对照组相当的间歇性八天补充热训练方案后,未观察到统计学上的显著改善。这可能是由于每次热训练课程的时间较短和/或每次热暴露之间的间隔时间较长。