Chalmers Samuel, Esterman Adrian, Eston Roger, Norton Kevin
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Nov;11(8):1029-1037. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0601. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Athletes often seek the minimum required time that might elicit a physiological or performance change. It is reasonable to suggest that heat training may improve aerobic-based performance in mild conditions. Therefore, rather than providing a traditional heat-exposure stimulus (ie, 7-10 × 60-100 min sessions), the current article details 2 studies that aimed to determine the effect of brief (≤240 min exposure) heat training on the second lactate threshold (LT) in mild conditions.
Forty-one participants completed 5 (study 1, n = 18) or 4 (study 2, n = 23) perceptually regulated treadmill exercise training sessions in 35°C and 30% relative humidity (RH) (experimental group) or 19°C and 30% RH (control group). Preincremental and postincremental exercise testing occurred in mild conditions (19°C and 30% RH). Linear mixed-effects models analyzed the change in LT. Results Heat training did not substantially change LT in either study 1 (+1.2%, d = 0.38, P = .248) or study 2 (+1.9%, d = 0.42, P = .163). LT was not substantially changed in the control group in study 1 (+1.3%, d = 0.43, P = .193), but a within-group change was evident in study 2 (+2.3%, d = 1.04, P = .001).
Brief heat training was inadequate to improve the speed at LT in mild conditions more than comparable training in mild conditions. The brief nature of the heattraining protocol did not allow adaptations to develop to the extent required to potentially confer a performance advantage in an environment that is less thermally stressful than the training conditions.
运动员常常寻求可能引发生理或运动表现变化的最短所需时间。有理由认为,热训练可能会在温和条件下改善以有氧代谢为主的运动表现。因此,本文并非提供传统的热暴露刺激(即7 - 10次,每次60 - 100分钟的训练),而是详细介绍了2项研究,旨在确定在温和条件下进行短暂(≤240分钟暴露)热训练对第二乳酸阈(LT)的影响。
41名参与者在35°C、相对湿度(RH)30%(实验组)或19°C、RH 30%(对照组)的环境中完成了5次(研究1,n = 18)或4次(研究2,n = 23)根据感知调节的跑步机运动训练课程。在温和条件(19°C、RH 30%)下进行递增运动前和递增运动后测试。线性混合效应模型分析了乳酸阈的变化。结果:在研究1(升高1.2%,d = 0.38,P = 0.248)和研究2(升高1.9%,d = 0.42,P = 0.163)中,热训练均未使乳酸阈发生显著变化。在研究1中,对照组的乳酸阈也没有显著变化(升高1.3%,d = 0.43,P = 0.193),但在研究2中,组内变化明显(升高2.3%,d = 1.04,P = 0.001)。
与在温和条件下进行的类似训练相比,短暂热训练不足以在温和条件下提高乳酸阈时的速度。热训练方案的短暂性使得机体无法产生足够的适应性变化,从而在比训练条件热应激更小的环境中获得潜在的运动表现优势。