Hoffmann D, Schott J W, Geis F K, Lange L, Müller F-J, Lenz D, Zychlinski D, Steinemann D, Morgan M, Moritz T, Schambach A
Institute of Experimental Hematology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence REBIRTH, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Gene Ther. 2017 May;24(5):298-307. doi: 10.1038/gt.2017.20. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
Correction of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) upon gene delivery through retroviral vectors offers new treatment perspectives for monogenetic diseases. Gene-modified iPSC clones can be screened for safe integration sites and differentiated into transplantable cells of interest. However, the current bottleneck is epigenetic vector silencing. In order to identify the most suitable retroviral expression system in iPSC, we systematically compared vectors from different retroviral genera, different promoters and their combination with ubiquitous chromatin opening elements (UCOE), and several envelope pseudotypes. Lentiviral vectors (LV) pseudotyped with vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein were superior to gammaretroviral and alpharetroviral vectors and other envelopes tested. The elongation factor 1α short (EFS) promoter mediated the most robust expression, whereas expression levels were lower from the potent but more silencing-prone spleen focus forming virus (SFFV) promoter. Both full-length (A2UCOE) and minimal (CBX3) UCOE juxtaposed to two physiological and one viral promoter reduced transgene silencing with equal efficiency. However, a promoter-specific decline in expression levels was not entirely prevented. Upon differentiation of transgene-positive iPSC into endothelial cells, A2UCOE.EFS and CBX3.EFS vectors maintained highest transgene expression in a larger fraction of cells as compared with all other constructs tested here. The function of UCOE diminished, but did not fully counteract, vector silencing and possibilities for improvements remain. Nevertheless, the CBX3.EFS in a LV background exhibited the most promising promoter and vector configuration for both high titer production and long-term genetic modification of human iPSC and their progeny.
通过逆转录病毒载体进行基因传递时对患者特异性诱导多能干细胞(iPSC)进行校正,为单基因疾病提供了新的治疗前景。可以筛选基因修饰的iPSC克隆以寻找安全的整合位点,并将其分化为感兴趣的可移植细胞。然而,当前的瓶颈是表观遗传载体沉默。为了确定iPSC中最合适的逆转录病毒表达系统,我们系统地比较了来自不同逆转录病毒属、不同启动子及其与泛在染色质开放元件(UCOE)组合的载体,以及几种包膜假型。用水泡性口炎病毒糖蛋白假型化的慢病毒载体(LV)优于γ逆转录病毒和α逆转录病毒载体以及所测试的其他包膜。伸长因子1α短链(EFS)启动子介导最强劲的表达,而强效但更易沉默的脾集落形成病毒(SFFV)启动子的表达水平较低。与两个生理性启动子和一个病毒启动子并列的全长(A2UCOE)和最小(CBX3)UCOE以相同效率降低了转基因沉默。然而,并未完全防止表达水平的启动子特异性下降。在转基因阳性的iPSC分化为内皮细胞后,与本文测试的所有其他构建体相比,A2UCOE.EFS和CBX3.EFS载体在更大比例的细胞中维持了最高的转基因表达。UCOE的功能减弱,但并未完全抵消载体沉默,仍有改进的可能性。尽管如此,LV背景下的CBX3.EFS在人iPSC及其后代的高滴度生产和长期基因修饰方面表现出最有前景的启动子和载体配置。