• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估关于良性阵发性位置性眩晕的在线信息的可读性和质量。

Assessing the readability and quality of online information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

作者信息

Raja H, Almansoor Z R

机构信息

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Jan;106(1):45-50. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0150. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2022.0150
PMID:36748797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10757881/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of peripheral vertigo. It can have a significant impact on quality of life, with individuals often seeking information online for reassurance and education. The aim of this study is to assess the readability and quality of online information on BPPV.

METHODS

The terms 'benign paroxysmal positional vertigo' and 'BPPV' were entered into Google. The first 50 websites generated for each search term were screened. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index and Gunning Fog Index (GFOG). Quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument. Spearman's correlation between quality and readability was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 39 websites met the inclusion criteria. The mean and 95% confidence intervals for the FRES, FKGL, SMOG, GFOG and DISCERN scores were 50.2 (46.1-54.3), 10.6 (9.87-11.4), 10.1 (9.5-10.7), 13.6 (12.7-14.4) and 36.7 (34.6-38.7), respectively. Weak correlation was noted between DISCERN and FRES ( = -0.23, = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Online information on BPPV is generally of poor quality and low readability. It is essential that healthcare professionals inform their patients of this limitation and advocate for improved online patient education resources that are both high quality and easy to comprehend.

摘要

引言

良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)是周围性眩晕最常见的病因。它会对生活质量产生重大影响,患者常常在网上寻求信息以获得安心和教育。本研究的目的是评估关于BPPV的在线信息的可读性和质量。

方法

在谷歌中输入“良性阵发性位置性眩晕”和“BPPV”这两个术语。对每个搜索词生成的前50个网站进行筛选。使用弗莱什-金凯德易读性评分(FRES)、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)、简化的难解词度量(SMOG)指数和冈宁雾指数(GFOG)评估可读性。使用DISCERN工具评估质量。计算质量与可读性之间的斯皮尔曼相关性。

结果

共有39个网站符合纳入标准。FRES、FKGL、SMOG、GFOG和DISCERN评分的均值及95%置信区间分别为50.2(46.1 - 54.3)、10.6(9.87 - 11.4)、10.1(9.5 - 10.7)、13.6(12.7 - 14.4)和36.7(34.6 - 38.7)。注意到DISCERN与FRES之间存在弱相关性( = -0.23, = 0.17)。

结论

关于BPPV的在线信息质量普遍较差且可读性较低。医疗保健专业人员必须告知患者这一局限性,并倡导改善在线患者教育资源,使其既高质量又易于理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/10757881/661f894380ba/rcsann.2022.0150.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/10757881/b3c4a7b7368b/rcsann.2022.0150.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/10757881/661f894380ba/rcsann.2022.0150.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/10757881/b3c4a7b7368b/rcsann.2022.0150.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/10757881/661f894380ba/rcsann.2022.0150.02.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the readability and quality of online information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.评估关于良性阵发性位置性眩晕的在线信息的可读性和质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Jan;106(1):45-50. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0150. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
Assessing the readability and quality of online information on anosmia.评估关于嗅觉障碍的在线信息的可读性和质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Feb;106(2):178-184. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0147. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.功能性内镜鼻窦手术:评估在线信息的可读性和质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Sep;105(7):639-644. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0123. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.在线气管造口护理资源的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):272-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599814560338. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
5
Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.评估父母对儿童疼痛在线资源的理解程度。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38569. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038569.
6
BPPV Information on Google Versus AI (ChatGPT).谷歌与人工智能(ChatGPT)上的良性阵发性位置性眩晕信息
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jun;170(6):1504-1511. doi: 10.1002/ohn.506. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.关于髋骨关节炎在线信息可读性的横断面分析。
Cureus. 2024 May 18;16(5):e60536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60536. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain.评估在线新冠后疼痛患者教育材料的易读性、质量和可靠性。
PeerJ. 2022 Jul 20;10:e13686. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13686. eCollection 2022.
9
Assessing the readability and quality of online information on Bell's palsy.评估贝尔氏麻痹症相关在线信息的可读性和质量。
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Oct;137(10):1130-1134. doi: 10.1017/S0022215122002626. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
10
Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.在线子宫切除术患者信息:系统环境扫描质量和可读性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Aug;44(8):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the readability and quality of online written information on epistaxis.评估在线鼻出血书面信息的可读性和质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Jul;107(6):429-433. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0053. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 on the digital divide: a rapid review.新冠疫情对数字鸿沟的影响:快速综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 12;11(10):e053440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053440.
2
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Maneuvers for Anterior Canal BPPV Canalithiasis: Three-Dimensional Simulations.前半规管耳石症的诊断与治疗手法:三维模拟
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 24;12:740599. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.740599. eCollection 2021.
3
How readable and reliable is online patient information on chronic rhinosinusitis?网上关于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的患者信息的可读性和可靠性如何?
J Laryngol Otol. 2021 Jul;135(7):644-647. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121001559. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice.新冠疫情期间数字浪潮的影响:关于研究与实践的观点
Int J Inf Manage. 2020 Dec;55:102171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
5
Going digital: how technology use may influence human brains and behavior
.走向数字化:技术使用如何影响人类大脑和行为
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jun;22(2):93-97. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mhoehe.
6
Readability of internet-sourced patient education material related to "labour analgesia".互联网上与“分娩镇痛”相关的患者教育材料的可读性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(45):e8526. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008526.
7
Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.评估关于前庭神经鞘瘤的在线患者信息的可读性和可靠性。
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Dec;38(10):e470-e475. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001565.
8
Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.评估有关吞咽障碍治疗的互联网信息来源的质量和可读性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):128-138. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600312.
9
Clinical Practice Guideline: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (Update).临床实践指南:良性阵发性位置性眩晕(更新版)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar;156(3_suppl):S1-S47. doi: 10.1177/0194599816689667.
10
Clinical practice. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.临床实践。良性阵发性位置性眩晕
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 20;370(12):1138-47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1309481.