Queen Mary University of London, Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London, Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London, UK.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 May;21(5):333-343. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
Are animals capable of empathy, problem-solving, or even self-recognition? Much research is dedicated to answering these questions and yet few studies have considered how humans form beliefs about animal minds. Evidence suggests that our mentalising of animals is a natural consequence of Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities. However, where beliefs regarding animal mind have been investigated, there has been slow progress in establishing the mechanism underpinning how this is achieved. Here, we consider what conclusions can be drawn regarding how people theorise about animal minds and the different conceptual and methodological issues that might limit the accuracy of conclusions currently drawn from this work. We suggest a new empirical framework for better capturing the human theory of animal mind, which in turn has significant political and social implications.
动物是否有同理心、解决问题的能力,甚至有自我认知?许多研究都致力于回答这些问题,但很少有研究考虑人类是如何形成对动物思维的看法的。有证据表明,我们对动物思维的心理化是心智理论(ToM)能力的自然结果。然而,在研究动物思维的信念时,人们在确定支撑这种信念形成的机制方面进展缓慢。在这里,我们考虑可以从人们对动物思维的理论化中得出什么结论,以及可能限制从这项工作中得出的结论准确性的不同概念和方法问题。我们建议了一个新的实证框架,以更好地捕捉人类的动物思维理论,这反过来又具有重大的政治和社会影响。