• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过改变认知目标和反应率来增强提问-行为效应:一项关于流感疫苗接种率的8臂随机对照试验

Varying cognitive targets and response rates to enhance the question-behaviour effect: An 8-arm Randomized Controlled Trial on influenza vaccination uptake.

作者信息

Conner Mark, Sandberg Tracy, Nekitsing Chandani, Hutter Russell, Wood Chantelle, Jackson Cath, Godin Gaston, Sheeran Paschal

机构信息

University of Leeds, UK.

University of Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;180:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.037
PMID:28347938
Abstract

RATIONALE

The question-behaviour effect (QBE) refers to the finding that survey questions about a behaviour can change that behaviour. However, little research has tested how the QBE can be maximized in behavioural medicine settings. The present research tested manipulations of cognitive targets (questions about anticipated regret or beneficence) and survey return rates (presence vs. absence of a sticky note requesting completion of the questionnaire) on the magnitude of the QBE for influenza vaccination in older adults.

METHOD

Participants (N = 13,803) were recruited from general practice and randomly allocated to one of eight conditions: control 1 (no questionnaire); control 2 (demographics questionnaire); intention and attitude questionnaire (with or without a sticky note); intention and attitude plus anticipated regret questionnaire (with or without a sticky note); intention and attitude plus beneficence questionnaire (with or without a sticky note). Objective records of subsequent influenza vaccination from general practice records formed the dependent variable.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analyses indicated that receiving an influenza vaccination questionnaire significantly increased vaccination rates compared to the no questionnaire, OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.36 and combined control conditions, OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.25. Including the sticky note significantly increased questionnaire return rates, OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.50. However, there were no differences in vaccination rates between questionnaires containing different cognitive targets, a sticky note or not, and no interactions. There were no significant differences in the per-protocol analyses, i.e. among respondents who completed and returned the questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

The QBE is a simple, low-cost intervention to increase influenza vaccination rates. Increasing questionnaire return rates or asking anticipated regret or beneficence questions in addition to intention and attitude questions did not enhance the QBE.

摘要

理论依据

问题-行为效应(QBE)指的是关于某种行为的调查问题能够改变该行为这一发现。然而,几乎没有研究测试过在行为医学环境中如何使问题-行为效应最大化。本研究测试了认知目标(关于预期遗憾或善举的问题)和调查问卷回收率(有无便签要求完成问卷)对老年人流感疫苗接种问题-行为效应大小的影响。

方法

从普通诊所招募参与者(N = 13803),并随机分配到八个条件之一:对照组1(无问卷);对照组2(人口统计学问卷);意向和态度问卷(有无便签);意向和态度加预期遗憾问卷(有无便签);意向和态度加善举问卷(有无便签)。从普通诊所记录中获取的后续流感疫苗接种客观记录构成因变量。

结果

意向性分析表明,与无问卷组相比,收到流感疫苗接种问卷显著提高了接种率,比值比(OR)= 1.17,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.01,1.36;与联合对照组相比,OR = 1.13,95% CI = 1.01,1.25。包含便签显著提高了问卷回收率,OR = 1.25,95% CI = 1.04,1.50。然而, 包含不同认知目标、有无便签的问卷之间的接种率没有差异,也没有交互作用。在符合方案分析中,即在完成并返还问卷的受访者中,没有显著差异。

结论

问题-行为效应是一种提高流感疫苗接种率的简单、低成本干预措施。提高问卷回收率或除了询问意向和态度问题之外还询问预期遗憾或善举问题,并没有增强问题-行为效应。

相似文献

1
Varying cognitive targets and response rates to enhance the question-behaviour effect: An 8-arm Randomized Controlled Trial on influenza vaccination uptake.通过改变认知目标和反应率来增强提问-行为效应:一项关于流感疫苗接种率的8臂随机对照试验
Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;180:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
2
Exploring the question-behaviour effect: randomized controlled trial of motivational and question-behaviour interventions.探索问题行为效应:动机和问题行为干预的随机对照试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2013 Feb;18(1):31-44. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02075.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
3
How do anticipated worry and regret predict seasonal influenza vaccination uptake among Chinese adults?预期的担忧和遗憾如何预测中国成年人接种季节性流感疫苗?
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 28;31(38):4084-90. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
4
Enhanced invitation methods and uptake of health checks in primary care: randomised controlled trial and cohort study using electronic health records.初级保健中强化健康检查邀请方法及参与率:使用电子健康记录的随机对照试验和队列研究
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Nov;20(84):1-92. doi: 10.3310/hta20840.
5
Testing an integrative theory of health behavioural change for predicting seasonal influenza vaccination uptake among healthcare workers.测试健康行为改变的综合理论,以预测医护人员接种季节性流感疫苗的情况。
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 16;38(3):690-698. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.041. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
6
Sociocognitive predictors of the intention of healthcare workers to receive the influenza vaccine in Belgian, Dutch and German hospital settings.比利时、荷兰和德国医院环境中卫生保健工作者接种流感疫苗意愿的社会认知预测因素。
J Hosp Infect. 2015 Mar;89(3):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
7
Anticipated regret and organ donor registration: A randomized controlled trial.预期遗憾与器官捐献登记:一项随机对照试验。
Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1169-1177. doi: 10.1037/hea0000363. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
8
Enhanced Invitations Using the Question-Behavior Effect and Financial Incentives to Promote Health Check Uptake in Primary Care.利用问题行为效应和经济激励措施增强邀请,以促进初级保健中的健康检查参与度。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 31;52(7):594-605. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax048.
9
Do both anticipated relief and anticipated regret predict decisions about influenza vaccination?预期缓解和预期遗憾都能预测流感疫苗接种决策吗?
Br J Health Psychol. 2024 Feb;29(1):134-148. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12691. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
10
Determinants of influenza vaccination among healthcare workers.医务人员流感疫苗接种的决定因素。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;31(7):689-93. doi: 10.1086/653614.

引用本文的文献

1
The mere-measurement effect of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.患者报告结局的单纯测量效应:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Qual Life Res. 2025 May;34(5):1211-1220. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03909-y. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
3
Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
接种疫苗行为干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Policy. 2023 Nov;137:104894. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104894. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
College students' influenza vaccine hesitation: a reasoned action investigation with quantitative and qualitative data.大学生流感疫苗犹豫:基于定量和定性数据的理性行为调查。
J Behav Med. 2023 Apr;46(1-2):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00310-9. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
Asking questions changes health-related behavior: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.提问可改变与健康相关的行为:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
6
Enhanced Invitations Using the Question-Behavior Effect and Financial Incentives to Promote Health Check Uptake in Primary Care.利用问题行为效应和经济激励措施增强邀请,以促进初级保健中的健康检查参与度。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 31;52(7):594-605. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax048.
7
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.提高社区60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub4.