Sharma Praveen, Rauf Abdul, Matin Abdul, Agarwal Rachit, Tyagi Pankaj, Arora Anil
Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2017 Mar;7(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
Malnutrition is frequently present in patients with cirrhosis. Anthropometric measures such as body mass index (BMI), mid arm muscle circumference (MAMC), triceps skin fold thickness (TST) and subjective global assessment (SGA) have some limitations in assessment of malnutrition. This study aims to determine the prevalence of malnutrition in non-hospitalized cirrhotic and chronic hepatitis patients and to assess handgrip (HG) strength as a tool for identifying malnutrition.
Consecutive patients of cirrhosis ( = 352), chronic hepatitis ( = 189) and healthy controls ( = 159) were enrolled. All patients underwent MAMC, TST, HG and SGA assessment. Malnutrition was diagnosed on basis of SGA score. Values of MAMC, TST and HG below the 5th percentile or less than 60% of healthy controls were considered as abnormal.
According to SGA (taken as standard) 24% patients with chronic hepatitis and 56% of patients with cirrhosis had malnutrition ( = 0.001). In patients with chronic hepatitis prevalence of malnutrition according to MAMC (12%), TST (31%) and HG (18%). In patients with cirrhosis prevalence of malnutrition according to MAMC (27%), TST (60%) and HG (42%). HG exercise strength had the highest area under curve 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.86, = 0.001) compared to MAMC 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.64, = 0.001) and TST 0.65 (95% CI 0.61-0.69, = 0.001) for assessing malnutrition. On comparison of HG, TST and MAMC, the sensitivity was 67%, 60% and 31%, respectively, Specificity was 95%, 71% and 89%, respectively, and diagnostic accuracy was 87%, 67% and 71%, respectively.
HG strength is an excellent tool to assess at bed side the nutrition status in patients with cirrhosis and has the highest diagnostic accuracy compared to other anthropometric tests such as MAMC and TST.
肝硬化患者常伴有营养不良。人体测量指标如体重指数(BMI)、上臂中部肌肉周长(MAMC)、肱三头肌皮褶厚度(TST)和主观全面评定法(SGA)在评估营养不良方面存在一定局限性。本研究旨在确定非住院肝硬化和慢性肝炎患者中营养不良的患病率,并评估握力(HG)作为识别营养不良的一种工具。
纳入连续的肝硬化患者(n = 352)、慢性肝炎患者(n = 189)和健康对照者(n = 159)。所有患者均接受MAMC、TST、HG和SGA评估。根据SGA评分诊断营养不良。MAMC、TST和HG值低于第5百分位数或低于健康对照者的60%被视为异常。
根据SGA(作为标准),24%的慢性肝炎患者和56%的肝硬化患者存在营养不良(P = 0.001)。在慢性肝炎患者中,根据MAMC(12%)、TST(31%)和HG(18%)评估的营养不良患病率。在肝硬化患者中,根据MAMC(27%)、TST(60%)和HG(42%)评估的营养不良患病率。与用于评估营养不良的MAMC(曲线下面积0.60,95%置信区间(CI)0.55 - 0.64,P = 0.001)和TST(曲线下面积0.65,95%CI 0.61 - 当评估营养不良时,HG运动强度的曲线下面积最高,为0.82(95%CI 0.78 - 0.86,P = 0.001)。比较HG、TST和MAMC,敏感性分别为67%、60%和31%,特异性分别为95%、71%和89%,诊断准确性分别为87%、67%和71%。
HG强度是一种在床边评估肝硬化患者营养状况的优秀工具,与其他人体测量测试如MAMC和TST相比,具有最高的诊断准确性。